Understanding adoption of intelligent personal assistants: A parasocial relationship perspective

The purpose of this paper is to develop a comprehensive research model that can explain customers’ continuance intentions to adopt and use intelligent personal assistants (IPAs).,This study proposes and validates a new theoretical model that extends the parasocial relationship (PSR) theory. Partial least squares analysis is employed to test the research model and corresponding hypotheses on data collected from 304 survey samples.,Interpersonal attraction (task attraction, social attraction, and physical attraction) and security/privacy risk are important factors affecting the adoption of IPAs.,First, this is the first empirical study to examine user acceptance of IPAs. Second, to the authors’ knowledge, no research has been conducted to test the role of PSR in the context of IPAs. Third, this study verified the robustness of the proposed model by introducing new antecedents reflecting risk-related attributes, which has not been investigated in prior PSR research. But this study has limitations that future research may address. First, key findings of this research are based only on data from users in the USA. Second, individual differences among the survey respondents were not examined.,To increase the adoption of IPAs, manufacturers should focus on developing “human-like” and “professional” assistants, in consideration of the important role of PSR and task attraction. R&D should continuously strive to realize artificial intelligence technology advances so that IPAs can better recognize the user’s voice and speak naturally like a person. Collaboration with third-party companies or individual developers is essential in this field, as manufacturers are unable to independently develop applications that support the specific tasks of various industries. It is also necessary to enhance IPA device design and its user interface to enhance physical attraction.,This study is the first empirical attempt to examine user acceptance of IPAs, as most of the prior literature has concerned analysis of usage patterns or technical features.

[1]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[2]  Ryan T. Wright,et al.  Assessing Common Method Bias: Problems with the ULMC Technique , 2012, MIS Q..

[3]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Dan J. Kim,et al.  Self-Perception-Based Versus Transference-Based Trust Determinants in Computer-Mediated Transactions: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Study , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Christian Nitzl,et al.  Mediation Analysis in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Helping Researchers Discuss More Sophisticated Models , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[6]  K. M. Lee,et al.  Can robots manifest personality? : An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction , 2006 .

[7]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[8]  F. Koenig,et al.  Viewers' Relationship to Television Personalities , 1985 .

[9]  G. Nejat,et al.  Acceptance and Attitudes Toward a Human-like Socially Assistive Robot by Older Adults , 2014, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[10]  Nobuhiro Kaji,et al.  Prediction of Prospective User Engagement with Intelligent Assistants , 2016, ACL.

[11]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[12]  Satoshi Kanazawa,et al.  Bowling with our imaginary friends , 2002 .

[13]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Analysis and Improvement of the Measurement of Interpersonal Attraction and Homophily , 2006 .

[14]  Jung-San Lee,et al.  Selective scalable secret image sharing with verification , 2015, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[15]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[16]  Franck Dernoncourt,et al.  Robust Dialog State Tracking for Large Ontologies , 2016, IWSDS.

[17]  Holger Schramm,et al.  Parasocial Interactions and Relationships , 2015 .

[18]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[19]  Munkee Choi,et al.  User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value , 2016, Telematics Informatics.

[20]  L. Whitmarsh,et al.  Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes , 2013 .

[21]  Kim-Phuong L. Vu,et al.  Privacy Concerns for Use of Voice Activated Personal Assistant in the Public Space , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Mark Grimshaw,et al.  Facial expression of emotion and perception of the Uncanny Valley in virtual characters , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  M. R. Levy,et al.  Watching TV news as para‐social interaction , 1979 .

[25]  C. Berger,et al.  SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[26]  Imed Zitouni,et al.  Automatic Online Evaluation of Intelligent Assistants , 2015, WWW.

[27]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  Imed Zitouni,et al.  Understanding User Satisfaction with Intelligent Assistants , 2016, CHIIR.

[29]  Ohbyung Kwon,et al.  Para-social relationships and continuous use of mobile devices , 2013, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[30]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[31]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Bruno M. C. Silva,et al.  An IoT-based mobile gateway for intelligent personal assistants on mobile health environments , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[33]  Hangjung Zo,et al.  User acceptance of location-based social networking services: An extended perspective of perceived value , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..

[34]  John R. Turner,et al.  Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers , 1993 .

[35]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of Delone and Mclean's Model of IS Success , 1996, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  A. Rubin,et al.  LONELINESS, PARASOCIAL INTERACTION, AND LOCAL TELEVISION NEWS VIEWING , 1985 .

[37]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[38]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[39]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[40]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[41]  Hangjung Zo,et al.  Industrial Management & Data Systems , 2017 .

[42]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[43]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  Hwansoo Lee,et al.  Exploring user acceptance of streaming media devices: an extended perspective of flow theory , 2018, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[45]  Chung-Tzer Liu,et al.  he effects of relationship quality and switching barriers on customer loyalty , 2010 .

[46]  Alan M. Rubin,et al.  Impact of Motivation, Attraction, and Parasocial Interaction on Talk Radio listening , 2000 .

[47]  Dilek Z. Hakkani-Tür,et al.  Zero-shot learning of intent embeddings for expansion by convolutional deep structured semantic models , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[48]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Building Trust in Online Auction Markets Through an Economic Incentive Mechanism , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[49]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web‐based learning continuance intention , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[50]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Clay M. Voorhees,et al.  Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies , 2016 .

[52]  Kem-Laurin Kramer,et al.  Effect of smartphone aesthetic design on users' emotional reaction: An empirical study , 2008 .

[53]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[54]  Lee Sproull,et al.  When the Interface Is a Face , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[55]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[56]  Ohbyung Kwon,et al.  Human likeness: cognitive and affective factors affecting adoption of robot-assisted learning systems , 2016, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[57]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[58]  R. Rubin,et al.  Development of parasocial interaction relationships , 1987 .

[59]  Richard A. Spreng,et al.  A Reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction , 1996 .

[60]  Mary Ann Eastlick,et al.  Understanding online B-to-C relationships: An integrated model of privacy concerns, trust, and commitment , 2006 .

[61]  Ali F. Farhoomand,et al.  A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[62]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  The Effects of Post-Adoption Beliefs on the Expectation-Confirmation Model for Information Technology Continuance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..