Visual Search Is Modulated by Action Intentions

The influence of action intentions on visual selection processes was investigated in a visual search paradigm. A predefined target object with a certain orientation and color was presented among distractors, and subjects had to either look and point at the target or look at and grasp the target. Target selection processes prior to the first saccadic eye movement were modulated by the different action intentions. Specifically, fewer saccades to objects with the wrong orientation were made in the grasping condition than in the pointing condition, whereas the number of saccades to an object with the wrong color was the same in the two conditions. Saccadic latencies were similar under the different task conditions, so the results cannot be explained by a speed-accuracy trade-off. The results suggest that a specific action intention, such as grasping, can enhance visual processing of action-relevant features, such as orientation. Together, the findings support the view that visual attention can be best understood as a selection-for-action mechanism.

[1]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[2]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[3]  A. Allport,et al.  Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action , 1987 .

[4]  O. Neumann Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention , 1987 .

[5]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[6]  H. Heuer,et al.  Perspectives on Perception and Action , 1989 .

[7]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[8]  D. Meyer,et al.  Eye-hand coordination: oculomotor control in rapid aimed limb movements. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  E T Rolls,et al.  Sparseness of the neuronal representation of stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  W. Schneider VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action , 1995 .

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  B. Gibson,et al.  Visual quality and attentional capture: a challenge to the special role of abrupt onsets. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[17]  J. Findlay Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[18]  P. Mamassian Prehension of objects oriented in three-dimensional space , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  J Tanji,et al.  Neuronal activity in the ventral part of premotor cortex during target-reach movement is modulated by direction of gaze. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  R. Desimone,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex during Memory- Guided Visual Search , 1998 .

[22]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[23]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Integration of visual and somatosensory target information in goal-directed eye and arm movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  T Moore,et al.  Shape representations and visual guidance of saccadic eye movements. , 1999, Science.

[25]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Visual search and target-directed action , 1999 .

[26]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Ocular gaze is anchored to the target of an ongoing pointing movement. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Jos J. Adam,et al.  Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Jos J. Adam,et al.  Interference between saccadic eye and goal-directed hand movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.