Steel braced frames with dual-core SCBs and sandwiched BRBs: Mechanics, modeling and seismic demands

Abstract A new steel dual-core self-centering brace (DC-SCB) is developed to have a flag-shaped re-centering hysteretic response under cyclic loads. Axial deformation capacity of the brace is doubled by serial deformations of two sets of tensioning elements arranged in parallel. In this paper, the mechanics of the new brace is first explained by considering a fabrication error of the member length, followed by testing one DC-SCB to evaluate its cyclic performance. The member length fabrication error, which is even 1/3000 times the brace length, significantly decreases the initial axial stiffness of the brace but does not affect the overall hysteretic behavior. Finite element analysis is conducted on the specimen to verify the mechanics and hysteretic responses observed in the test. Finite element analyses are also performed on other 16 DC-SCBs to evaluate how tensioning element types, initial post-tensioned force, and friction force affect the cyclic performance of the brace. Additionally, three braced frames of varying heights are designed using two bracing members, DC-SCBs and sandwiched buckling-restrained braces (BRBs). Nonlinear time history analyses are conducted on these braced frames to obtain seismic demands under both design and maximum considerable levels of earthquake motions and near-field motions. Self-centering braced frames generally exhibit smaller peak interstory drifts and residual drifts than buckling-restrained braced frames.

[1]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Frame and Brace Action Forces on Steel Corner Gusset Plate Connections in Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames , 2012 .

[2]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Pseudo‐dynamic tests of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame—Part I: Specimen design, experiment and analysis , 2008 .

[3]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Seismic design and shake table tests of a steel post‐tensioned self‐centering moment frame with a slab accommodating frame expansion , 2011 .

[4]  S. Pessiki,et al.  Analytical and Experimental Lateral Load Behavior of Unbonded Posttensioned Precast Concrete Walls , 2007 .

[5]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Self-Centering Energy Dissipative Bracing System for the Seismic Resistance of Structures: Development and Validation , 2008 .

[6]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Development of Steel Dual-Core Self-Centering Braces: Quasi-Static Cyclic Tests and Finite Element Analyses , 2015 .

[7]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Two-plastic-hinge and two dimensional finite element models for post-tensioned precast concrete segmental bridge columns , 2013 .

[8]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Development of cross-anchored dual-core self-centering braces for seismic resistance , 2014 .

[9]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Analytical model validation and influence of column bases for seismic responses of steel post-tensioned self-centering MRF systems , 2011 .

[10]  Jie Li,et al.  Steel self-centering moment frames with collector beam floor diaphragms , 2008 .

[11]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of a Large-Scale Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame , 2007 .

[12]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Seismic self‐centering steel beam‐to‐column moment connections using bolted friction devices , 2008 .

[13]  Richard Sause,et al.  Influence of design parameters on seismic response of post-tensioned steel MRF systems , 2008 .

[14]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Development of floor slab for steel post-tensioned self-centering moment frames , 2011 .

[15]  Richard Sause,et al.  Posttensioned Seismic-Resistant Connections for Steel Frames , 2001 .

[16]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces , 2003 .

[17]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Compressive behavior of dual-gusset-plate connections for buckling-restrained braced frames , 2012 .

[18]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Evaluating performance of post‐tensioned steel connections with strands and reduced flange plates , 2006 .

[19]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Component Testing, Seismic Evaluation and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Braces , 2004 .

[20]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system , 2006 .

[21]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces , 2010 .

[22]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Steel Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames , 2004 .

[23]  Richard Sause,et al.  Earthquake Simulations on a Self-Centering Steel Moment Resisting Frame with Web Friction Devices , 2009 .

[24]  Toru Takeuchi,et al.  LOCAL BUCKLING RESTRAINT CONDITION FOR CORE PLATES IN BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES , 2010 .

[25]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Posttensioned Energy Dissipating Connections for Moment-Resisting Steel Frames , 2002 .

[26]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Steel buckling‐restrained braced frames with single and dual corner gusset connections: seismic tests and analyses , 2012 .

[27]  Yu-Chi Wang,et al.  Seismic design and behavior of post-tensioned steel connections including effects of a composite slab , 2008 .

[28]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Component tests of buckling-restrained braces with unconstrained length , 2009 .

[29]  Chung-Che Chou,et al.  Tests and analyses of a full-scale post-tensioned RCS frame subassembly , 2010 .

[30]  F. López-Almansa,et al.  A low-tech dissipative buckling restrained brace. Design, analysis, production and testing , 2009 .