High Local Genetic Diversity and Low Outcrossing Rate in Caenorhabditis elegans Natural Populations

BACKGROUND Caenorhabditis elegans is a major model system in biology, yet very little is known about its biology outside the laboratory. In particular, its unusual mode of reproduction with self-fertile hermaphrodites and facultative males raises the question of its frequency of outcrossing in natural populations. RESULTS We describe the first analysis of C. elegans individuals sampled directly from natural populations. C. elegans is found predominantly in the dauer stage and with a very low frequency of males versus hermaphrodites. Whereas C. elegans was previously shown to display a low worldwide genetic diversity, we find by comparison a surprisingly high local genetic diversity of C. elegans populations; this local diversity is contributed in great part by immigration of new alleles rather than by mutation. Our results on heterozygote frequency, male frequency, and linkage disequilibrium furthermore show that selfing is the predominant mode of reproduction in C. elegans natural populations but that infrequent outcrossing events occur, at a rate of approximately 1%. CONCLUSIONS Our results give a first insight in the biology of C. elegans in the natural populations. They demonstrate that local populations of C. elegans are genetically diverse and that a low frequency of outcrossing allows for the recombination of these locally diverse genotypes.

[1]  Nicholas H. Barton,et al.  The Effects of Genetic and Geographic Structure on Neutral Variation , 2003 .

[2]  B. Weir,et al.  ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  P. Ingvarsson A METAPOPULATION PERSPECTIVE ON GENETIC DIVERSITY AND DIFFERENTIATION IN PARTIALLY SELF‐FERTILIZING PLANTS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  M. Daly,et al.  A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms , 2001, Nature.

[5]  Hanh Witte,et al.  A bacterial artificial chromosome-based genetic linkage map of the nematode Pristionchus pacificus. , 2002, Genetics.

[6]  P. Phillips,et al.  Molecular evolution and quantitative variation for chemosensory behaviour in the nematode genus Caenorhabditis , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[7]  W. Wood The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans , 1988 .

[8]  Jody Hey,et al.  Population genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans: the paradox of low polymorphism in a widespread species. , 2003, Genetics.

[9]  J. Hodgkin,et al.  Natural variation and copulatory plug formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1997, Genetics.

[10]  K. Kiontke,et al.  Description of Caenorhabditis japonica n. sp. (Nematoda: Rhabditida) associated with the burrower bug Parastrachia japonensis (Heteroptera: Cydnidae) in Japan , 2002 .

[11]  M. Nei,et al.  MOLECULAR POPULATION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION , 1976 .

[12]  D. Charlesworth,et al.  Breeding systems and genome evolution. , 2001, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[13]  I. Roldán‐Ruiz,et al.  Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[14]  R. Sommer,et al.  Microevolutionary analysis of the nematode genus Pristionchus suggests a recent evolution of redundant developmental mechanisms during vulva formation , 2001, Evolution & development.

[15]  S. W. Emmons,et al.  Caenorhabditis Vulgaris Sp.N. (Nematoda: Rhabditidae): a Necromenic Associate of Pill Bugs and Snails , 1994 .

[16]  H. Innan,et al.  DNA variation in the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. , 1999, Genetics.

[17]  K. B. McKusick,et al.  High-throughput gene mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2002, Genome research.

[18]  Bernhard Haubold,et al.  LIAN 3.0: detecting linkage disequilibrium in multilocus data , 2000, Bioinform..

[19]  G. Gort,et al.  Significance Tests and Weighted Values for AFLP Similarities, Based on Arabidopsis in Silico AFLP Fragment Length Distributions , 2004, Genetics.

[20]  I. Andrássy Klasse Nematoda , 1984 .

[21]  R. Terauchi,et al.  A method for estimating nucleotide diversity from AFLP data. , 1999, Genetics.

[22]  M. Lynch,et al.  Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers , 1994, Molecular ecology.

[23]  H. Schulenburg,et al.  Evolutionary history of Caenorhabditis elegans inferred from microsatellites: evidence for spatial and temporal genetic differentiation and the occurrence of outbreeding. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  G. McVean,et al.  A genealogical interpretation of linkage disequilibrium. , 2002, Genetics.

[25]  B. Berger,et al.  ARACHNE: a whole-genome shotgun assembler. , 2002, Genome research.

[26]  J. Goudet FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Updated from Goudet (1995) , 2001 .

[27]  P. Andolfatto Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  W Kelley Thomas,et al.  Phylogenetics in Caenorhabditis elegans: an analysis of divergence and outcrossing. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  Gennifer E. Merrihew,et al.  High Genetic Diversity in the Chemoreceptor Superfamily of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2005, Genetics.

[30]  P. Phillips,et al.  Selection and maintenance of androdioecy in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2002, Genetics.

[31]  D. Hartl,et al.  Principles of population genetics , 1981 .

[32]  R. Hudson,et al.  Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. , 1985, Genetics.

[33]  J. Walters,et al.  Levels of DNA polymorphism vary with mating system in the nematode genus caenorhabditis. , 2002, Genetics.

[34]  M. A. van der Horst,et al.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in wild isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2000, Genome research.

[35]  Chao Qian,et al.  Population , 1940, State Rankings 2020: A Statistical View of America.

[36]  Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations , 1998 .

[37]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations , 2004, Genetica.

[38]  J. Chasnov,et al.  Why are there males in the hermaphroditic species Caenorhabditis elegans? , 2002, Genetics.

[39]  W. Gish,et al.  Rapid gene mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans using a high density polymorphism map , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[40]  Aird,et al.  Natural and experimental associations of Caenorhabditis remanei with Trachelipus rathkii and other terrestrial isopods , 2000 .

[41]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  DNA Fingerprinting: State of the Science , 1993, Progress in Systems and Control Theory.

[42]  P. Vos,et al.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  L. Jin,et al.  A unified approach to study hypervariable polymorphisms: statistical considerations of determining relatedness and population distances. , 1993, EXS.

[44]  Dee R. Denver,et al.  High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome , 2004, Nature.

[45]  S. Ward,et al.  The proximate determinants of sex ratio in C. elegans populations. , 2003, Genetical research.

[46]  M. Nordborg Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. , 1997, Genetics.