A thin glycoprotein coating of a synthetic lenticule does not cause nutritional deficiency of the anterior cornea.

PURPOSE This study investigated whether a glycoprotein coating that will be used to enhance corneal epithelialization affects in situ nutritional passage through a permeable membrane. METHODS Sixteen adult cats were equally divided into two groups. Polycarbonate membranes with pore size of 0.1 microm and total pore area (porosity) of 3.1% were used as implant materials. The membranes for Group 1 were coated with a thin layer of Collagen I, while the membranes for Group 2 were uncoated. Each membrane with 8-mm diameter was implanted into an interlamellar pocket of the cornea. The eyes were observed for approximately 35 days to monitor clinical signs of nutritional deficiency of the cornea, and then 7 membranes were removed from the eyes. The permeability of the explanted membranes to glucose, inulin and albumin was used to predict the in situ difference between the coated and uncoated groups in regard to nutritional passage through the membranes. To investigate the long-term effect of the surface coating on corneal health, two animals from Group 1 were followed for up to two years and then both eyes of each animal underwent histological examination. RESULTS Clinically, no post-surgical complications associated with nutritional deficiency were observed in any of the eyes. Nutritional permeability tests showed no significant differences between the coated and uncoated membranes. Histologically, the long-term animals showed no abnormal morphology associated with nutritional deficiency in the cornea anterior or posterior to the membranes. CONCLUSIONS A thin glycoprotein coating on a permeable membrane does not appear to affect the nutritional supply of the anterior cornea and therefore can be used to enhance epithelialization of synthetic corneal onlays in vivo.

[1]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  Surface topography can interfere with epithelial tissue migration. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  B. Holden,et al.  Nutritional requirements of the corneal epithelium and anterior stroma: clinical findings. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  Effects of biologically modified surfaces of synthetic lenticules on corneal epithelialization in vivo. , 1997, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  C. Foster,et al.  Expression of collagens I, III, IV and V mRNA in excimer wounded rat cornea: analysis by semi-quantitative PCR. , 1995, Current eye research.

[5]  R. Beuerman,et al.  Assessment of the long‐term corneal response to hydrogel intrastromal lenses implanted in monkey eyes for up to five years , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  B. McCarey,et al.  Eight years experience with Permalens intracorneal lenses in nonhuman primates. , 1992, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[7]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Corneal cell adhesion and proliferation on hydrogel sheets bound with cell-adhesive proteins. , 1991, Current eye research.

[8]  B. McCarey Refractive Keratoplasty with Synthetic Lens Implants , 1991, International ophthalmology clinics.

[9]  B. McCarey,et al.  Modeling glucose distribution in the cornea. , 1990, Current eye research.

[10]  M. Refojo,et al.  Experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis from extended wear of soft contact lenses. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  I. Gipson,et al.  Reassembly of the anchoring structures of the corneal epithelium during wound repair in the rabbit. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  G. Waring,et al.  Effect of diameter and depth on the response to solid polysulfone intracorneal lenses in cats. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  S. Lane,et al.  ALLOPLASTIC CORNEAL LENSES , 1988, International ophthalmology clinics.

[14]  J. P. Gilbard,et al.  A new rabbit model for keratoconjunctivitis sicca. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  G. Waring,et al.  Complications of hydrogel intracorneal lenses in monkeys. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  B. Dastugue,et al.  Protein migration through hydrogels: a tool for measuring porosity--application to hydrogels used as contact lenses. , 1986, Analytical biochemistry.

[17]  G. Waring,et al.  Hydrogel keratophakia: a freehand pocket dissection in the monkey model. , 1986, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  G. Waring,et al.  Polysulfone corneal lenses , 1986, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  T. Hamano,et al.  Electron microscopic study of intrastromal hydrogel implants in primates. , 1984, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[20]  D. Apple,et al.  Opacification, vascularization, and chronic inflammation produced by hydrogel corneal lamellar implants. , 1984, American journal of ophthalmology-glaucoma.

[21]  R. Colvin,et al.  Basement membrane components in healing rabbit corneal epithelial wounds: immunofluorescence and ultrastructural studies , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  I. Gipson,et al.  Epithelial sheet movement: protein and glycoprotein synthesis. , 1982, Developmental biology.

[23]  R. Peiffer,et al.  Alloplastic Implants in Non-Human Primates: I. Surgical Technique , 1982 .

[24]  D. M. Andrews,et al.  Refractive keratoplasty with intrastromal hydrogel lenticular implants. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  J. Friend,et al.  Effect of a corneal fluid barrier on the nutrition of the epithelium. , 1970, Experimental eye research.

[26]  S. I. Brown,et al.  The effect of intralamellar water-impermeable membranes on corneal hydration. , 1966, Archives of ophthalmology.

[27]  J. Barraquer,et al.  Modification of refraction by means of intracorneal inclusions. , 1966, International ophthalmology clinics.