Minireview Predicting biodegradation

Summary Biodegradation is important for natural and industrial cycling of environmental chemicals. Industries and government regulators increasingly seek to know the fate of chemicals in the environment and thus prevent potential negative impacts on human or ecosystem health. However, millions of organic compounds are known, and most will remain unstudied with respect to biodegradation. This necessitates the development of organized biodegradation information coupled with predictive methods. Biodegradation prediction methods are being developed using the information contained in the University of Minnesota Biocatalysis/ Biodegradation database. Heuristic rules are derived from compiled biodegradation information. Additional rules are generated by deconstructing compounds into a set of the 40 most common organic functional groups. The rules consist of deriving biochemically plausible catabolic reactions for each of the functional groups. More complex compounds, containing multiple functional groups, are analysed using higher order rules requiring prioritizing enzymatic attack and reactions cleaving functional groups. While biodegradation prediction, like weather prediction, will never be perfect, it can be an important tool for guiding industry, regulators and experimentalists.

[1]  R. Fleischmann,et al.  Strategies for whole microbial genome sequencing and analysis , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[2]  Michael Travisano,et al.  Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment , 1998, Nature.

[3]  Lynda B. M. Ellis,et al.  The University of Minnesota Biocatalysis/Biodegradation Database: specialized metabolism for functional genomics , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  N. W. Davis,et al.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. , 1997, Science.

[5]  H. Govers,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships for biodegradation. , 1990, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[6]  Stuart M. Speedie,et al.  Representing metabolic pathway information: an object-oriented approach , 1998, Bioinform..

[7]  R. Boethling,et al.  Expert systems survey on biodegradation of xenobiotic chemicals. , 1989, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[8]  Donald J. Berndt,et al.  Predicting microbial biodegradation pathways , 1999 .

[9]  S. Dagley,et al.  Lessons from biodegradation. , 1987, Annual review of microbiology.

[10]  L. Wackett,et al.  Molecular Basis of a Bacterial Consortium: Interspecies Catabolism of Atrazine , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  M. Gealt,et al.  Biodegradation and Bioremediation. , 1996 .

[12]  T. Vogel,et al.  Biotransformation of tetrachloroethylene to trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, vinyl chloride, and carbon dioxide under methanogenic conditions , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[13]  W. Meylan,et al.  Development of a predictive model for biodegradability based on BIODEG, the evaluated biodegradation data base. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  J. Damborský A mechanistic approach to deriving quantitative structure-activity relationship models for microbial degradation of organic compounds. , 1996, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[15]  J. Thornton,et al.  Tess: A geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases. Application to enzyme active sites , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  Lawrence P. Wackett,et al.  Expression of naphthalene oxidation genes in Escherichia coli results in the biosynthesis of indigo. , 1983, Science.