The Role of Communication and Engagement in Airport Noise Management

Research suggests that non-acoustic factors can have a considerable effect on community attitudes and opinions towards aviation noise and that these can be influenced through processes of communication and engagement. This paper reviews literature from various fields to identify the key elements of effective practice, using them as a lens through which to assess case study noise management actions conducted at European airports. This analysis found that communication and engagement holds significant potential for noise management, but that this remains largely unfulfilled due to such methods being used as an ancillary management activity, rather than as a powerful tool to aid in the design and delivery of noise management actions. A series of recommendations and research priorities are proposed that could shape the future of noise management, including potential changes to European policy that more explicitly advocate for communication and engagement as a noise management tool in its own right.

[1]  Luigi Maffei,et al.  Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment , 2016 .

[2]  T. Webler,et al.  Public Participation in Impact Assess-ment: A Social Learning Perspective , 1995 .

[3]  T. Wyller,et al.  [Environmental noise and health]. , 1986, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[4]  C. Asensio,et al.  A Review of Non-Acoustic Measures to Handle Community Response to Noise around Airports , 2017, Current Pollution Reports.

[5]  Adam Gibson,et al.  The role of messaging on acceptability of military aircraft sounds in Sequoia National Park , 2014 .

[6]  Zhang Li-hua.  The Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment , 2003 .

[7]  Jack Sheppard,et al.  The case for a design-led, end-user focused airport noise management process , 2021, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[8]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[9]  Ling Lin,et al.  Research Design and Methods , 2019, Corpora and Intercultural Studies.

[10]  Jon M Woodward,et al.  Aircraft Noise: A Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations , 2009 .

[11]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[12]  David Robert Woods.  Stakeholder involvement and public participation: a critique of Water Framework Directive arrangements in the United Kingdom , 2008 .

[13]  Luis Gasco,et al.  Communicating airport noise emission data to the general public. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  Francesco Babich,et al.  Indoor soundscape assessment: A principal components model of acoustic perception in residential buildings , 2020, Building and Environment.

[15]  Manuel Recuero,et al.  Citizens’ perception of the efficacy of airport noise insulation programmes in Spain , 2014 .

[16]  Delwyn N. Clark,et al.  Strategic management tool usage: a comparative study , 1997 .

[17]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[18]  R. Guski,et al.  WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Annoyance , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[19]  M. Parlange,et al.  A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  Djamel Ouis,et al.  ANNOYANCE FROM ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE: A REVIEW , 2001 .

[22]  B. Hall,et al.  Knowledge Democracy and Excellence in Engagement , 2016 .

[23]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[24]  Callum Thomas,et al.  Towards Sustainable Aviation , 2003 .

[25]  Thomas Webler,et al.  “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick , 1995 .