Stochastic differential equation models for ion channel noise in Hodgkin-Huxley neurons.

The random transitions of ion channels between conducting and nonconducting states generate a source of internal fluctuations in a neuron, known as channel noise. The standard method for modeling the states of ion channels nonlinearly couples continuous-time Markov chains to a differential equation for voltage. Beginning with the work of R. F. Fox and Y.-N. Lu [Phys. Rev. E 49, 3421 (1994)], there have been attempts to generate simpler models that use stochastic differential equation (SDEs) to approximate the stochastic spiking activity produced by Markov chain models. Recent numerical investigations, however, have raised doubts that SDE models can capture the stochastic dynamics of Markov chain models.We analyze three SDE models that have been proposed as approximations to the Markov chain model: one that describes the states of the ion channels and two that describe the states of the ion channel subunits. We show that the former channel-based approach can capture the distribution of channel noise and its effects on spiking in a Hodgkin-Huxley neuron model to a degree not previously demonstrated, but the latter two subunit-based approaches cannot. Our analysis provides intuitive and mathematical explanations for why this is the case. The temporal correlation in the channel noise is determined by the combinatorics of bundling subunits into channels, but the subunit-based approaches do not correctly account for this structure. Our study confirms and elucidates the findings of previous numerical investigations of subunit-based SDE models. Moreover, it presents evidence that Markov chain models of the nonlinear, stochastic dynamics of neural membranes can be accurately approximated by SDEs. This finding opens a door to future modeling work using SDE techniques to further illuminate the effects of ion channel fluctuations on electrically active cells.

[1]  Ian C. Bruce,et al.  Implementation Issues in Approximate Methods for Stochastic Hodgkin–Huxley Models , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Charles Pecher,et al.  La Fluctuation D'excitabilité de la Fibre Nerveuse , 1939 .

[3]  J. White,et al.  Channel noise in neurons , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  I. Goychuk,et al.  Stochastic resonance as a collective property of ion channel assemblies , 2001, physics/0106036.

[5]  Michele Giugliano,et al.  Accurate and Fast Simulation of Channel Noise in Conductance-Based Model Neurons by Diffusion Approximation , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[7]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Single-Channel Recording , 1995, Springer US.

[8]  P Hänggi,et al.  Effect of channel block on the spiking activity of excitable membranes in a stochastic Hodgkin–Huxley model , 2004, Physical biology.

[9]  M. Freidlin,et al.  Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems , 1984 .

[10]  Cian O'Donnell,et al.  Stochastic Ion Channel Gating in Dendritic Neurons: Morphology Dependence and Probabilistic Synaptic Activation of Dendritic Spikes , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[12]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  The Dependence of Auditory Nerve Rate Adaptation on Electric Stimulus Parameters, Electrode Position, and Fiber Diameter: A Computer Model Study , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[13]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Metabolically Efficient Information Processing , 2001, Neural Computation.

[14]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Effects of synaptic noise and filtering on the frequency response of spiking neurons. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[15]  Jay T. Rubinstein,et al.  Stochastic Population Model for Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  J. R. Clay,et al.  Relationship between membrane excitability and single channel open-close kinetics. , 1983, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Ron Meir,et al.  History-Dependent Dynamics in a Generic Model of Ion Channels – An Analytic Study , 2009, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[18]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  An Algorithmic Introduction to Numerical Simulation of Stochastic Differential Equations , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[19]  J. E. Glynn,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[20]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Remo Guidieri Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[22]  Jay T. Rubinstein,et al.  Comparison of Algorithms for the Simulation of Action Potentials with Stochastic Sodium Channels , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Ion-Channel Noise Places Limits on the Miniaturization of the Brain’s Wiring , 2005, Current Biology.

[24]  Peter F. Rowat,et al.  Interspike Interval Statistics in the Stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley Model: Coexistence of Gamma Frequency Bursts and Highly Irregular Firing , 2007, Neural Computation.

[25]  Fox,et al.  Emergent collective behavior in large numbers of globally coupled independently stochastic ion channels. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[26]  R. Fox Stochastic versions of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[27]  A. Destexhe,et al.  Stochastic Methods in Neuroscience , 2012 .

[28]  B. Hille Ionic channels of excitable membranes , 2001 .

[29]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  Shangyou Zeng,et al.  Mechanism for neuronal spike generation by small and large ion channel clusters. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  G. Garcia de Polavieja Errors Drive the Evolution of Biological Signalling to Costly Codes , 2001 .

[32]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Effects of noise on the spike timing precision of retinal ganglion cells. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  B. Hassard Bifurcation of periodic solutions of Hodgkin-Huxley model for the squid giant axon. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  J. Ruppersberg Ion Channels in Excitable Membranes , 1996 .

[35]  E. V. Nuttall ACT , 1986 .

[36]  Herbert K. H. Lee,et al.  Gaussian Processes , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[37]  E. Allen Modeling with Itô Stochastic Differential Equations , 2007 .

[38]  Idan Segev,et al.  Ion Channel Stochasticity May Be Critical in Determining the Reliability and Precision of Spike Timing , 1998, Neural Computation.

[39]  A. Alonso,et al.  Noise from voltage-gated ion channels may influence neuronal dynamics in the entorhinal cortex. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  K. Vahala Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences , 1986, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[41]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Spontaneous action potentials due to channel fluctuations. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[42]  P. Jung,et al.  Optimal intracellular calcium signaling. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[43]  L. Walløe,et al.  Firing behaviour in a stochastic nerve membrane model based upon the Hodgkin-Huxley equations. , 1979, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[44]  Gabriel J. Lord,et al.  Stochastic Methods in Neuroscience , 2009 .

[45]  S. Swain Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences , 1984 .

[46]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[47]  J E Niven,et al.  Comparison of Langevin and Markov channel noise models for neuronal signal generation. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  L S Liebovitch,et al.  Fractal methods to analyze ion channel kinetics. , 2001, Methods.

[49]  Ian C. Bruce,et al.  Evaluation of Stochastic Differential Equation Approximation of Ion Channel Gating Models , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.