Lethal now or lethal later: The natural history of Grade 4 blunt cerebrovascular injury

BACKGROUND Grade 4 blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI4) has a known, significant rate of stroke. However, little is known about the natural history of BCVI4 and the pathophysiology of subsequent stroke formation. METHODS A 4-year review of patients with BCVI4 at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center was performed. Rates of BCVI4-related stroke, stroke-related mortality, and overall mortality were calculated. The relationship of change in vessel characteristics and BCVI4-related stroke was examined, as was the mechanism of stroke formation. RESULTS There were 82 BCVI4s identified, with 13 carotid artery (ICA) and 69 vertebral artery BCVI4s. BCVI4-related stroke rate was 2.9% in vertebral artery BCVI4 and 70% in ICA BCVI4 patients surviving to reimaging. Stroke mechanisms included embolic strokes, thrombotic strokes, and combined embolic and thrombotic strokes. Peristroke vessel recanalization and an embolic stroke mechanism were seen in 100% of ICA BCVI4-related strokes developing after admission. BCVI4-related stroke occurred within 10 hours of hospital admission in 67% of the patients with strokes. Contraindications to anticoagulation were present in most patients with BCVI4-related stroke developing after admission. CONCLUSION Multiple etiologies of stroke formation exist in BCVI4. Early risk-benefit analysis for initiation of anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents should be performed in all patients with BCVI4, and the use of endovascular vessel occlusion should be considered in those with true contraindications to anticoagulation. However, more aggressive medical therapy may be needed to lessen BCVI4-related stroke development. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level IV; therapeutic study, level V.

[1]  Thomas M Scalea,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening guidelines: What are we willing to miss? , 2014, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[2]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Timing and mechanism of ischemic stroke due to extracranial blunt traumatic cerebrovascular injury. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  R. Higashida,et al.  Current trends in endovascular management of traumatic cerebrovascular injury , 2013, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[4]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: Redefining screening criteria in the era of noninvasive diagnosis , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[5]  J. Weigelt,et al.  Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries is cost-effective. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  S. Norwood,et al.  Blunt vertebral artery injuries in the era of computed tomographic angiographic screening: incidence and outcomes from 8,292 patients. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  Alexander L. Eastman,et al.  CTA-based screening reduces time to diagnosis and stroke rate in blunt cervical vascular injury. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  G. Velmahos,et al.  Blunt carotid artery injury: the futility of aggressive screening and diagnosis. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[9]  E. Moore,et al.  Anticoagulation is the gold standard therapy for blunt carotid injuries to reduce stroke rate. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[10]  E. Moore,et al.  Treatment-Related Outcomes From Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Importance of Routine Follow-Up Arteriography , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[11]  T. Fabian,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: diagnosis and treatment. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  E. Moore,et al.  The devastating potential of blunt vertebral arterial injuries. , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[13]  E. Moore,et al.  Optimizing screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[14]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  T. Scalea,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter? , 2009, The Journal of trauma.