Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise reduction technology by magnetic gradient waveform control.

BACKGROUND ComforTone is a noise reduction technology used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems; it suppresses acoustic noise by modifying pulse sequences, which appropriately changes the magnetic field gradient waveforms. Although ComforTone can be used to solve the acoustic noise problems that affect patients who are exposed to acoustic noise from MRI, to the best of our knowledge, the associated technical details have not been published and its effects on acoustic noise reduction remain unclear. PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of acoustic noise reduction and the impact of acoustic noise reduction technology involving magnetic field gradient waveform control on image quality. POPULATION The study included 18 healthy volunteers (11 males and 7 females; median age, 34 years; age range, 24-51 years). FIELD STRENGTH 1.5 T Philips Ingenia using a SENSE head-spine coil. ASSESSMENT The sound pressure level (SPL) and 1/3 octave spectra of MRI acoustic noise with the human head positioned in the iso-center of the MRI system were measured for five different pulse sequences used in clinical MRI. This subjective evaluation of noise included 18 healthy volunteers. The degree of discomfort experienced by the subjects was measured using a visual analog scale. The image quality was assessed objectively and subjectively. For objective assessment, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to -noise ratio (CNR) of diffusion-weighted images were measured; for subjective assessment, visual evaluation was performed by two radiologists. STATISTICAL TESTS Data were analyzed using Welch's t-test, and a p value <0.05 defined significance. RESULTS ComforTone could recognize a decrease in sound pressure, and the sound pressure of the acute high-frequency portion of the auditory characteristics was reduced. As reported by the subjects, discomfort caused by the sound pressure was significantly alleviated with ComforTone (p < 0.01). The sound pressure reduction in the high-frequency region with high audibility characteristics was recognized by ComforTone. The visual evaluation of the image quality of the diffusion-weighted images revealed that although there was no difference between SNR and CNR, the image quality was reduced by distortion artifacts. DATA CONCLUSION ComforTone reduced the SPL in the frequency range where auditory characteristics were sensitive, suggesting that ComforTone was useful for auditory protection and alleviation of discomfort in patients undergoing MRI. However, because magnetic field gradient waveform control is involved, such noise-reducing techniques should be used by considering their possible influence on the image quality.

[1]  J. Paschoal,et al.  Study of the relationship between the degree of tinnitus annoyance the presence of hyperacusis , 2014, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[2]  P. Bijur,et al.  Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[3]  A. C. Guimarães,et al.  Estudo da relação entre o grau de incômodo de pacientes com zumbido e a presença de hiperacusia , 2014 .

[4]  F Hennel,et al.  Fast spin echo and fast gradient echo MRI with low acoustic noise , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  K. Yeom,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Silent T1-Weighted MRI and Silent MR Angiography of the Brain. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Björn Heismann,et al.  Acoustic-noise-optimized diffusion-weighted imaging , 2015, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[7]  Vikas Gulani,et al.  Parallel Imaging–Based Reduction of Acoustic Noise for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[8]  A. Katsunuma,et al.  Quiet MRI with novel acoustic noise reduction , 2001, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[9]  Jing-Huei Lee,et al.  Acoustic noise characteristics of a 4 Telsa MRI scanner , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  T. Loenneker,et al.  “Silent” MRI with soft gradient pulses , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Jason M. Johnson,et al.  Optimal Brain MRI Protocol for New Neurological Complaint , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  A R Palmer,et al.  Sound‐Level Measurements and Calculations of Safe Noise Dosage During EPI at 3 T , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Adriaan Moelker,et al.  Importance of bone‐conducted sound transmission on patient hearing in the MR scanner , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  F. Shellock,et al.  MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. , 2004, Radiology.

[15]  Hiroshi Fujita,et al.  Acoustic noise analysis in echo planar imaging: multicenter trial and comparison with other pulse sequences , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Active Acoustic Screening: Reduction of Noise in Gradient Coils by Lorentz Force Balancing , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  W A Edelstein,et al.  Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Yôiti Suzuki,et al.  Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  David Grodzki,et al.  Sequence‐based acoustic noise reduction of clinical MRI scans , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Xavier Golay,et al.  Routine clinical brain MRI sequences for use at 3.0 Tesla , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  R E Brummett,et al.  Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[23]  R. Mallozzi,et al.  Making MRI quieter. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  M McJury,et al.  The use of active noise control (ANC) to reduce acoustic noise generated during MRI scanning: some initial results. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.