On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies

Within the context of the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, we developed a general theoretical framework for deciding when it is more efficient to process two tasks in serial and when it is more efficient to process them in parallel. This analysis suggests that a serial mode is more efficient than a parallel mode under a wide variety of conditions and thereby suggests that ubiquitous evidence of serial processing in PRP tasks could result from performance optimization rather than from a structural bottleneck. The analysis further suggests that the experimenter-selected distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) influences the relative efficiency of the serial and parallel modes, with a preponderance of short SOAs favoring a parallel mode. Experiments varying the distribution of SOAs were conducted, and the results suggest that there is a shift from a more serial mode to a more parallel mode as the likelihood of short SOAs increases.

[1]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Pierre Jolicœur,et al.  All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon , 2002, Psychological research.

[4]  P McLeod,et al.  Does Probe RT Measure Central Processing Demand? , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Ritske De Jong,et al.  The Role of Preparation in Overlapping-task Performance , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  William L. Maxwell,et al.  Theory of scheduling , 1967 .

[7]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[8]  A. Welford.  THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[9]  W. G. Koster,et al.  The psychological refractory period , 1966 .

[10]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  C D Wickens,et al.  The effects of divided attention on information processing in manual tracking. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  P. McLeod.  A Dual Task Response Modality Effect: Support for Multiprocessor Models of Attention , 1977 .

[13]  A. Jersild.  Mental set and shift , 2011 .

[14]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[15]  C. W. Telford.  The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .

[16]  D. Navon,et al.  Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  I. Biederman,et al.  Mental set and mental shift revisited , 1976 .

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: implications for models of perception. , 2001, Psychological review.

[19]  Roberto Dell'Acqua,et al.  Attentional and structural constraints on visual encoding , 1999 .

[20]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attention and performance. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  H. Pashler,et al.  Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or strategic postponement? , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  H. Pashler.  Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  A. Welford.  Single-channel operation in the brain. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[24]  R. Proctor,et al.  Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  B. Rolke,et al.  Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  S. Laughlin.  Energy as a constraint on the coding and processing of sensory information , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  H. Pashler,et al.  Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: Graded capacity sharing or central postponement? , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading , 2002, Vision Research.

[30]  G D Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Why practice reduces dual-task interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[33]  R. Gottsdanker.  A psychological refractory period or an unprepared period , 1979 .

[34]  D. Navon.  Resources—a theoretical soup stone? , 1984 .

[35]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[36]  M. Carpenter,et al.  The Brain , 1971, Neurology.

[37]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[38]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.

[39]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[40]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[41]  F. Bloom.  Principles of Neural Science, 3rd ed , 1993 .

[42]  Roy Luria,et al.  Online order control in the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Walter Dandy,et al.  The Brain , 1966 .

[44]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  S. Hackley,et al.  Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[46]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[47]  A. T. Welford,et al.  Evidence of a Single-Channel Decision Mechanism Limiting Performance in a Serial Reaction Task* , 1959 .

[48]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Précis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from EPIC computational models of human multiple-task performance , 1997 .

[49]  E. Spelke,et al.  Skills of divided attention , 1976, Cognition.

[50]  D. Navon,et al.  Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[51]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  A Bayesian approach to the evolution of perceptual and cognitive systems , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[52]  H. Pashler,et al.  Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[54]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[55]  J. Rauschecker.  Parallel Processing in the Auditory Cortex of Primates , 1998, Audiology and Neurotology.

[56]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[58]  D. Meyer,et al.  Impulsivity and speed-accuracy tradeoffs in information processing. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  D. Gopher,et al.  Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. , 1999 .

[60]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  Models of central capacity and concurrency , 1984 .

[61]  E. Spelke,et al.  Dividing Attention Without Alternation or Automaticity , 1980 .

[62]  Robert Borger,et al.  The Refractory Period and Serial Choice-reactions , 1963 .

[63]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Attention and human performance , 1973 .

[64]  Eric R. Kandel,et al.  Perception of motion, depth and form , 2000 .

[65]  R. D. de Jong,et al.  Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[66]  John R. Anderson.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[67]  E Ruthruff,et al.  Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  G. Claxton.  Cognitive psychology: New directions , 1980 .

[70]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.

[71]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. , 1999 .

[72]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. , 2001 .

[73]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: uncoupling of lateralized response codes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[74]  D. Navon.  The importance of being conservative: Some reflections on human Bayesian behaviour , 1978 .

[75]  A M Wing,et al.  Brief bimanual force pulses: correlations between the hands in force and time. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[76]  Eliot Hazeltine,et al.  Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[77]  B. Hommel.  Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[78]  G D Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[79]  P. J. Foley.  The foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[80]  K S Seidler,et al.  Information access in a dual-task context: testing a model of optimal strategy selection. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[81]  J. Müsseler,et al.  Blindness to response-compatible stimuli in the psychological refractory period paradigm , 2002 .

[82]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[83]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[84]  M. C. Smith,et al.  The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period , 1969 .

[85]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[86]  B. Boycott,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate , 1990, Vision Research.

[87]  Wolfgang Schwarz,et al.  On the Interpretation of Response Time vs Onset Asynchrony Functions: Application to Dual-Task and Precue-Utilization Paradigms. , 2001, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[88]  G. Kane.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .