A comparison of transformation methods for evaluating two‐dimensional weakly singular integrals

Accurate numerical evaluation of integrals arising in the boundary element method is fundamental to achieving useful results via this solution technique. In this paper, a number of techniques are considered to evaluate the weakly singular integrals which arise in the solution of Laplace's equation in three dimensions and Poisson's equation in two dimensions. Both are two-dimensional weakly singular integrals and are evaluated using (in a product fashion) methods which have recently been used for evaluating one-dimensional weakly singular integrals arising in the boundary element method. The methods used are based on various polynomial transformations of conventional Gaussian quadrature points where the transformation polynomial has zero Jacobian at the singular point. Methods which split the region of integration into sub-regions are considered as well as non-splitting methods. In particular, the newly introduced and highly accurate generalized composite subtraction of singularity and non-linear transformation approach (GSSNT) is applied to various two-dimensional weakly singular integrals. A study of the different methods reveals complex relationships between transformation orders, position of the singular point, integration kernel and basis function. It is concluded that the GSSNT method gives the best overall results for the two-dimensional weakly singular integrals studied.

[1]  Masataka Tanaka,et al.  On non‐linear transformations for accurate numerical evaluation of weakly singular boundary integrals , 2001 .

[2]  Gernot Beer,et al.  Introduction to Finite and Boundary Element Methods for Engineers , 1993 .

[3]  David Elliott,et al.  Error estimation of quadrature rules for evaluating singular integrals in boundary element problems , 2000 .

[4]  Peter Rex Johnston Semi-sigmoidal transformations for evaluating weakly singular boundary element integrals , 2000 .

[5]  Ian H. Sloan,et al.  Numerical Solution of the Generalized Airfoil Equation for an Airfoil with a Flap , 1997 .

[6]  Peter Rex Johnston,et al.  A simple device to improve the accuracy of evaluating weakly singular boundary element integrals , 2002 .

[7]  L. Scuderi,et al.  A Collocation Method for the Generalized Airfoil Equation for an Airfoil with a Flap , 1998 .

[8]  David Elliott,et al.  Transformations for evaluating singular boundary element integrals , 2002 .

[9]  Miguel Cerrolaza,et al.  A bi‐cubic transformation for the numerical evaluation of the Cauchy principal value integrals in boundary methods , 1989 .

[10]  Peter Rex Johnston,et al.  Application of sigmoidal transformations to weakly singular and near-singular boundary element integrals , 1999 .

[11]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  On non‐linear transformations for the integration of weakly‐singular and Cauchy Principal Value integrals , 1997 .

[12]  A generalisation of Telles' method for evaluating weakly singular boundary element integrals , 2001 .

[13]  J. Telles A self-adaptive co-ordinate transformation for efficient numerical evaluation of general boundary element integrals , 1987 .