Estimating the accuracy of dietary questionnaire assessments: validation in terms of structural equation models.

The validity and precision of questionnaire assessments of the habitual intake of individuals are usually evaluated by comparison with reference measurements that are supposed to provide a best possible substitute for the individuals' true intake values. In the present paper, a measurement error model is presented, defining different types of error--random or systematic, and within or between individuals--that may occur in dietary intake measurements. It is then discussed how simple latent variable models (structural equation models) can be used to estimate the average magnitude of these various types of error. So far, approaches described for the analysis of dietary validity studies have all been based on the assumption that the random errors of repeat reference measurements, taken by the same method on different occasions, are uncorrelated, so that the average of a sufficiently large number of repeat reference measurements will provide an accurate ranking of individuals by true intake level. In the present paper it is described how, by additional comparison with a third type of measurement such as a biochemical marker, the validity of dietary questionnaire measurements can be evaluated even in situations where the random errors of repeat reference measurements can no longer be assumed to be independent.

[1]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[2]  G. Block,et al.  A review of validations of dietary assessment methods. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Biomarkers of dietary exposure. , 1991 .

[4]  W. Willett,et al.  An overview of issues related to the correction of non-differential exposure measurement error in epidemiologic studies. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Barnett Vd.  Simultaneous pairwise linear structural relationships. , 1969 .

[6]  P. Corey,et al.  Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. , 1979, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[7]  B Rosner,et al.  Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within-person measurement error. , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Accuracy of weighed dietary records in studies of diet and health. , 1990, BMJ.

[9]  A. Madansky.  The fitting of straight lines when both variables are subject to error , 1959 .

[10]  T. Cole,et al.  Some statistical considerations on dietary assessment methods. , 1989, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[11]  R. Saracci,et al.  Biological markers of diet. , 1987, Cancer surveys.

[12]  Brian Everitt,et al.  An Introduction to Latent Variable Models , 1984 .

[13]  A A Tsiatis,et al.  The impact that group sequential tests would have made on ECOG clinical trials. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  L S Freedman,et al.  The impact of dietary measurement error on planning sample size required in a cohort study. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  N. Boyd,et al.  A review of the methods used by studies of dietary measurement. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  W. Willett,et al.  Interval estimates for correlation coefficients corrected for within-person variation: implications for study design and hypothesis testing. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  T J Cole,et al.  Between- and within-subject variation in nutrient intake from infancy to old age: estimating the number of days required to rank dietary intakes with desired precision. , 1989, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[18]  N. E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of intraindividual and interindividual variation in repeated dietary records. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  J. Medalie,et al.  Random repeat 24-hour dietary recalls. , 1971, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[20]  D A Schoeller,et al.  Validity of reported energy intake in obese and nonobese adolescents. , 1990, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[21]  W. A. van Staveren,et al.  Manual on methodology for food consumption studies. , 1988 .

[22]  E. Riboli,et al.  Dietary assessment methods evaluated in the Malmö food study , 1993, Journal of internal medicine.

[23]  R J Carroll,et al.  Estimating the relation between dietary intake obtained from a food frequency questionnaire and true average intake. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  B G Armstrong,et al.  Analysis of case-control data with covariate measurement error: application to diet and colon cancer. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.