The emergence of embedded structure: insights from Kafr Qasem Sign Language

This paper introduces data from Kafr Qasem Sign Language (KQSL), an as-yet undescribed sign language, and identifies the earliest indications of embedding in this young language. Using semantic and prosodic criteria, we identify predicates that form a constituent with a noun, functionally modifying it. We analyze these structures as instances of embedded predicates, exhibiting what can be regarded as very early stages in the development of subordinate constructions, and argue that these structures may bear directly on questions about the development of embedding and subordination in language in general. Deutscher (2009) argues persuasively that nominalization of a verb is the first step—and the crucial step—toward syntactic embedding. It has also been suggested that prosodic marking may precede syntactic marking of embedding (Mithun, 2009). However, the relevant data from the stage at which embedding first emerges have not previously been available. KQSL might be the missing piece of the puzzle: a language in which a noun can be modified by an additional predicate, forming a proposition within a proposition, sustained entirely by prosodic means.

[1]  Irit Meir,et al.  The influence of community on language structure: Evidence from two young sign languages , 2012 .

[2]  Roland Pfau,et al.  Tense, aspect, and modality , 2012 .

[3]  Leon Stassen,et al.  Comparison and universal grammar , 1987 .

[4]  M. Nespor,et al.  Prosody in Israeli Sign Language , 1999 .

[5]  Marianne Mithun,et al.  Re(e)volving Complexity: Adding Intonation , 2008 .

[6]  U. Zeshan,et al.  Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights , 2012 .

[7]  Irit Meir,et al.  A Language in Space: The Story of Israeli Sign Language , 2007 .

[8]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  The Phonological Organization of Sign Languages , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[9]  William Labov,et al.  The Social Stratification of (r) in New York City Department Stores , 1997 .

[10]  R. Langacker Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites , 1987 .

[11]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  What you can say without syntax: a hierarchy of grammatical complexity , 2014 .

[12]  O. Crasborn,et al.  Explaining prosodic body leans in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Pragmatics required , 2006 .

[13]  G. Deutscher Syntactic Change in Akkadian: The Evolution of Sentential Complementation , 2000 .

[14]  Vadim Kimmelman,et al.  Parts of speech in Russian Sign Language: The role of iconicity and economy , 2009 .

[15]  Thomas Givon,et al.  The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution , 2009 .

[16]  Annika Herrmann Prosody in German Sign Language , 2012 .

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[18]  C. Padden,et al.  The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Sign Language and Linguistic Universals: Entering the lexicon: lexicalization, backformation, and cross-modal borrowing , 2006 .

[20]  R. Truswell,et al.  What You Can Say Without Syntax: A Hierarchy of Grammatical Complexity , 2013 .

[21]  Robert Pepperell,et al.  What is a Human? , 1994, Intell. Tutoring Media.

[22]  W. Sandler,et al.  Visual Intonation in the Prosody of a Sign Language , 2009, Language and speech.

[23]  Onno Crasborn,et al.  OF SENTENCES IN SIGNED LANGUAGES , 2022 .

[24]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  On recursion , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[25]  C. Padden,et al.  Language emergence Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language , 2014 .

[26]  W. Sandler,et al.  Visual intonation in two sign languages* , 2013, Phonology.

[27]  Brenda Nicodemus,et al.  Prosodic Markers and Utterance Boundaries in American Sign Language Interpretation , 2009 .

[28]  B. Heine From nominal to clausal morphosyntax: Complexity via expansion , 2009 .

[29]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Prosody and Syntax in Sign Languages. , 2010, Transactions of the Philological Society. Philological Society.

[30]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[31]  Guy Deutscher,et al.  Nominalization and the origin of subordination , 2009 .

[32]  Carol Padden,et al.  Sign Languages: Sign languages in the Arab world , 2010 .

[33]  Keith Walters,et al.  Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages: A crosslinguistic examination of the lexicons of four signed languages , 2002 .

[34]  Irit Meir,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology: Language emergence , 2014 .

[35]  Irit Meir,et al.  The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax. , 2011, Lingua. International review of general linguistics. Revue internationale de linguistique generale.

[36]  B. Woll,et al.  Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages , 2008 .

[37]  Chiara Branchini,et al.  Relatively different: Italian Sign Language relative clauses in a typological perspective , 2009 .

[38]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Cilticization and Prosodic Words in a Sign Language , 1999 .

[39]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system: Building nominal constituents in homesign , 2012, Language.

[40]  Masayoshi Shibatani,et al.  Syntactic complexity : diachrony, acquisition, neuro-cognition, evolution , 2009 .

[41]  Jordan Fenlon,et al.  Seeing sentence boundaries , 2007 .

[42]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  What is the human language faculty?: Two views , 2011 .

[43]  Trevor Johnston,et al.  BSL, Auslan and NZSL : three signed languages or one? , 2003 .

[44]  P. B. Braem Rhythmic Temporal Patterns in the Signing of Deaf Early and Late Learners of Swiss German Sign Language , 1999 .

[45]  S. Pinker,et al.  The faculty of language: what's special about it? , 2005, Cognition.

[46]  S. Kisch Disablement, gender, and deafhood among the Negev Arab-Bedouin , 2007 .

[47]  Onno Crasborn,et al.  Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora , 2008, LREC 2008.

[48]  C. Padden,et al.  Sign Language Geography in the Arab World , 2008 .

[49]  Roland Pfau,et al.  Relative clauses in German Sign Language: Extraposition and reconstruction , 2005 .

[50]  Victoria Nyst,et al.  24. Shared sign languages , 2012 .

[51]  T Johnston,et al.  Nouns and verbs in Australian sign language: an open and shut case? , 2001, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[52]  Carol A. Padden,et al.  Against all expectations : Encoding subjects and objects in a new language , 2007 .

[53]  Scott K. Liddell,et al.  American Sign Language: The Phonological Base , 2013 .

[54]  C. Padden,et al.  Emerging Sign Languages , 2010, Languages.

[55]  Bernadet Hendriks,et al.  Jordanian Sign Language: Aspects of grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective: (University of Amsterdam, 2008) , 2008 .

[56]  C. Padden,et al.  The Roots of Linguistic Organization in a New Language. , 2008, Interaction studies.

[57]  Scott K. Liddell American Sign Language Syntax , 1981 .

[58]  W. Sandler Dedicated gestures and the emergence of sign language , 2012 .

[59]  Tommi Jantunen,et al.  The equative sentence in Finnish Sign Language , 2007 .

[60]  B. Heine,et al.  The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction , 2007 .

[61]  Shifra Kisch,et al.  “Deaf Discourse”: The Social Construction of Deafness in a Bedouin Community , 2008, Medical anthropology.

[62]  Irit Meir,et al.  The survival of Algerian Jewish Sign Language alongside Israeli Sign Language in Israel , 2012 .

[63]  W. Bruce Croft Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations , 1990 .

[64]  Barbara Hunger,et al.  Noun/Verb Pairs in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS) , 2006 .