International Combination Service for Time-Variable Gravity Fields (COST-G)

The International Combination Service for Time-variable Gravity Fields (COST-G) is a new Product Center of IAG’s International Gravity Field Service (IGFS). COST-G provides consolidated monthly global gravity fields in terms of spherical harmonic coefficients and thereof derived grids of surface mass changes by combining existing solutions or normal equations from COST-G analysis centers (ACs) and partner analysis centers (PCs). The COST-G ACs adopt different analysis methods but apply agreed-upon consistent processing standards to deliver time-variable gravity field models, e.g. from GRACE/GRACE-FO low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking (ll-SST), GPS high-low satellite-to-satellite tracking (hl-SST) and Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR). The organizational structure of COST-G and results from the first release of combined monthly GRACE solutions covering the entire GRACE time period are discussed in this article. It is shown that by combining solutions and normal equations from different sources COST-G is taking advantage of the statistical properties of the various solutions, which results in a reduced noise level compared to the individual input solutions.

[1]  Pieter Visser,et al.  Validation of GOCE gravity field models by means of orbit residuals and geoid comparisons , 2011 .

[2]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  GRACE RL06 reprocessing and results from CSR , 2018 .

[3]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Status of the GRACE Follow-On Mission , 2013 .

[4]  Grzegorz Michalak,et al.  The GFZ GRACE RL06 Monthly Gravity Field Time Series: Processing Details and Quality Assessment , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[5]  H. Bock,et al.  The impact of common versus separate estimation of orbit parameters on GRACE gravity field solutions , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[6]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  European Gravity Service for Improved Emergency Management (EGSIEM)—from concept to implementation , 2019, Geophysical Journal International.

[7]  A. Jäggi,et al.  Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[8]  H. Bock,et al.  GOCE: precise orbit determination for the entire mission , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[9]  J. Kusche.  Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE-type gravity field models , 2007 .

[10]  Roland Klees,et al.  Evaluating GRACE Mass Change Time Series for the Antarctic and Greenland Ice Sheet—Methods and Results , 2019, Geosciences.

[11]  Szabolcs Rózsa,et al.  The Geodesist’s Handbook 2016 , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[12]  C. Shum,et al.  Multi-approach gravity field models from Swarm GPS data , 2019 .

[13]  A. Jäggi,et al.  AIUB-RL02: an improved time-series of monthly gravity fields from GRACE data , 2016 .

[14]  Harald Schuh,et al.  ICGEM – 15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associated services, and future plans , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[15]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[16]  Eric Rignot,et al.  A Reconciled Estimate of Ice-Sheet Mass Balance , 2012, Science.

[17]  Srinivas Bettadpur,et al.  The pole tide and its effect on GRACE time‐variable gravity measurements: Implications for estimates of surface mass variations , 2015 .

[18]  A. Jäggi,et al.  Combination of GRACE monthly gravity fields on the normal equation level , 2019, Journal of Geodesy.

[19]  Beate Klinger,et al.  ITSG‐Grace2018: Overview and Evaluation of a New GRACE‐Only Gravity Field Time Series , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[20]  Beate Klinger,et al.  The role of accelerometer data calibration within GRACE gravity field recovery: Results from ITSG-Grace2016 , 2016 .