Electronic health records and health care quality over time in a federally qualified health center

The longitudinal effects of electronic health records (EHRs) on ambulatory quality are not clear. It is not known whether adoption and meaningful use of EHRs result in a brief period of quality improvement that then plateaus, or whether with ongoing use quality improvement continues. We studied health care quality at six sites of a Federally Qualified Health Center in New York State over 3 years (2008-2010) for 25 290 unique patients. Patients were twice as likely to receive recommended care on a set of 12 quality measures (11 of which are included in Stage 1 Meaningful Use) 3 years post-EHR implementation, compared to 1-year post-implementation (odds ratio 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.91-2.03). The magnitude of absolute improvement ranged from 5% to 20% per measure. EHRs were associated with continuing improvement in health care quality for at least 3 years post-implementation in the safety-net setting of a Federally Qualified Health Center.

[1]  Terhilda Garrido,et al.  Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  C. O'connor,et al.  Electronic health records and quality of care for heart failure. , 2010, American heart journal.

[3]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Quality of Care , 2013, Journal of general internal medicine.

[4]  E. Hing,et al.  Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013. , 2014, NCHS data brief.

[5]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Measuring the effects of health information technology on quality of care: a novel set of proposed metrics for electronic quality reporting. , 2009, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[6]  Mark W Friedberg,et al.  Associations Between Structural Capabilities of Primary Care Practices and Performance on Selected Quality Measures , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  Sameer Malhotra,et al.  Accuracy of Electronically Reported “Meaningful Use” Clinical Quality Measures , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Chelsea A. Jenter,et al.  Relationship Between Use of Electronic Health Record Features and Health Care Quality: Results of a Statewide Survey , 2010, Medical care.

[9]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[10]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  M. Buntin,et al.  Geographic variation in ambulatory electronic health record adoption: implications for underserved communities. , 2013, Health services research.

[12]  Hhs Centers for Medicare Medicare Services.  Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. , 2010, Federal register.

[13]  R. Stafford,et al.  Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  R. Cebul,et al.  Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Steven R. Simon,et al.  The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. , 2009, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[16]  C. Burt,et al.  Are There Patient Disparities When Electronic Health Records Are Adopted? , 2009, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[17]  L. Casalino,et al.  Small physician practices in new york needed sustained help to realize gains in quality from use of electronic health records. , 2013, Health affairs.

[18]  E. Hing,et al.  Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2012. , 2012, NCHS data brief.

[19]  Sejong Bae,et al.  Health information technology capacity at federally qualified health centers: a mechanism for improving quality of care , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[20]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Paul L Hebert,et al.  Electronic Health Record Components and the Quality of Care , 2008, Medical care.

[22]  S. Simon,et al.  Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting , 2002, BMC health services research.

[23]  D. Bates,et al.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  Curtis L. Cole,et al.  A long-term follow-up evaluation of electronic health record prescribing safety. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.