Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes.

The mechanical properties of single cells play important roles in regulating cell-matrix interactions, potentially influencing the process of mechanotransduction. Recent studies also suggest that cellular mechanical properties may provide novel biological markers, or "biomarkers," of cell phenotype, reflecting specific changes that occur with disease, differentiation, or cellular transformation. Of particular interest in recent years has been the identification of such biomarkers that can be used to determine specific phenotypic characteristics of stem cells that separate them from primary, differentiated cells. The goal of this study was to determine the elastic and viscoelastic properties of three primary cell types of mesenchymal lineage (chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and adipocytes) and to test the hypothesis that primary differentiated cells exhibit distinct mechanical properties compared to adult stem cells (adipose-derived or bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells). In an adherent, spread configuration, chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and adipocytes all exhibited significantly different mechanical properties, with osteoblasts being stiffer than chondrocytes and both being stiffer than adipocytes. Adipose-derived and mesenchymal stem cells exhibited similar properties to each other, but were mechanically distinct from primary cells, particularly when comparing a ratio of elastic to relaxed moduli. These findings will help more accurately model the cellular mechanical environment in mesenchymal tissues, which could assist in describing injury thresholds and disease progression or even determining the influence of mechanical loading for tissue engineering efforts. Furthermore, the identification of mechanical properties distinct to stem cells could result in more successful sorting procedures to enrich multipotent progenitor cell populations.

[1]  V. Moy,et al.  Mechanical properties of L929 cells measured by atomic force microscopy: effects of anticytoskeletal drugs and membrane crosslinking. , 2006, Scanning.

[2]  D L Bader,et al.  Deformation properties of articular chondrocytes: a critique of three separate techniques. , 2002, Biorheology.

[3]  J. Triffitt,et al.  Human bone tissue formation in diffusion chamber culture in vivo by bone-derived cells and marrow stromal fibroblastic cells. , 1995, Bone.

[4]  Wilson C. Hayes,et al.  Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics , 1995 .

[5]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  T. Burkholder Mechanotransduction in skeletal muscle. , 2007, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[7]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Signal transduction pathways involved in mechanotransduction in bone cells. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[8]  G. Charras,et al.  Single cell mechanotransduction and its modulation analyzed by atomic force microscope indentation. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[9]  R. Mahaffy,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  Cell mechanics and mechanotransduction: pathways, probes, and physiology. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[11]  F. Guilak,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of zonal articular chondrocytes measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  R. Gundle,et al.  The isolation and culture of cells from explants of human trabecular bone. , 1995, Calcified tissue international.

[13]  B. Pauli,et al.  Synthesis of cartilage matrix by mammalian chondrocytes in vitro. I. Isolation, culture characteristics, and morphology , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  Jeremy J Mao,et al.  Cytoskeletal Changes of Mesenchymal Stem Cells During Differentiation , 2007, ASAIO journal.

[15]  V. Mow,et al.  The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Comparison of the mechanical properties of normal and transformed fibroblasts. , 1997, Biorheology.

[17]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Substrate dependent differences in morphology and elasticity of living osteoblasts investigated by atomic force microscopy. , 2000, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[18]  F Guilak,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  R. Tuan,et al.  Biology of adult mesenchymal stem cells: regulation of niche, self-renewal and differentiation , 2007 .

[20]  F. Guilak,et al.  The role of the cytoskeleton in the viscoelastic properties of human articular chondrocytes. , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  The biomechanical role of the chondrocyte pericellular matrix in articular cartilage. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[22]  Kevin D. Costa,et al.  Single-Cell Elastography: Probing for Disease with the Atomic Force Microscope , 2004, Disease markers.

[23]  M. J. Jaasma,et al.  The Effects of Morphology, Confluency, and Phenotype on Whole-Cell Mechanical Behavior , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[25]  F. Guilak,et al.  Physical regulation of cartilage metabolism , 2005 .

[26]  J. McGarry,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell. , 2004, European cells & materials.

[27]  SenLi Guo,et al.  Packing density and structural heterogeneity of insulin amyloid fibrils measured by AFM nanoindentation. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[28]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Perspectives on chondrocyte mechanobiology and osteoarthritis. , 2006, Biorheology.

[29]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[30]  W. Godwin Article in Press , 2000 .

[31]  R. Tuan,et al.  Mesenchymal stromal cells. Biology of adult mesenchymal stem cells: regulation of niche, self-renewal and differentiation , 2007, Arthritis research & therapy.

[32]  E. Okine,et al.  Primary Adipocyte Culture: Adipocyte Purification Methods May Lead to a New Understanding of Adipose Tissue Growth and Development , 2004, Cytotechnology.

[33]  C Zhu,et al.  Cell mechanics: mechanical response, cell adhesion, and molecular deformation. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[34]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[35]  E. Evans,et al.  Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Catherine M. Verfaillie,et al.  Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow , 2007, Nature.

[37]  M. Evans,et al.  Primary human osteoblast proliferation and prostaglandin E2 release in response to mechanical strain in vitro. , 1998, Bone.

[38]  F. Guilak,et al.  The Role of F-Actin in Hypo-Osmotically Induced Cell Volume Change and Calcium Signaling in Anulus Fibrosus Cells , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[40]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic potential? , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[41]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction , 2003, Annals of medicine.

[42]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Differentiation potential of adipose derived adult stem (ADAS) cells. , 2003, Current topics in developmental biology.

[43]  F. Guilak,et al.  Extended passaging, but not aldehyde dehydrogenase activity, increases the chondrogenic potential of human adipose‐derived adult stem cells , 2006, Journal of cellular physiology.

[44]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[45]  F. Guilak The deformation behavior and viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes in articular cartilage. , 2000, Biorheology.

[46]  Viscoelastic Properties of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[47]  I. Titushkin,et al.  Distinct membrane mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells determined using laser optical tweezers. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[48]  K Athanasiou,et al.  Cytoindentation for obtaining cell biomechanical properties , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[49]  K. Athanasiou,et al.  Biomechanics of single zonal chondrocytes. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[50]  N O Petersen,et al.  Dependence of locally measured cellular deformability on position on the cell, temperature, and cytochalasin B. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Alexander G Robling,et al.  Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. , 2006, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[52]  Armand Keating,et al.  Mesenchymal stromal cells , 2006, Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine.

[53]  F. Guilak,et al.  Clonal analysis of the differentiation potential of human adipose‐derived adult stem cells , 2006, Journal of cellular physiology.

[54]  A. Barnett,et al.  Ceiling culture of mature human adipocytes: use in studies of adipocyte functions. , 2000, The Journal of endocrinology.

[55]  Ferenc Horkay,et al.  Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[56]  L. Setton,et al.  Cell Mechanics and Mechanobiology in the Intervertebral Disc , 2004, Spine.

[57]  S. Mokhtar,et al.  Comparison of bioengineered human bone construct from four sources of osteogenic cells , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[58]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[59]  Kyriacos A Athanasiou,et al.  Creep indentation of single cells. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[60]  Kevin D. Costa,et al.  Osteoblast Elastic Modulus Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy Is Substrate Dependent , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[61]  Nic D. Leipzig,et al.  Unconfined creep compression of chondrocytes. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[62]  G. Sukhikh,et al.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2002, Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[63]  G. Charras,et al.  Determination of cellular strains by combined atomic force microscopy and finite element modeling. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[64]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.