Concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE To evaluate the role of concurrent cisplatin plus radiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer. METHODS A systematic review of randomized trials of cisplatin administered concurrently with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy without cisplatin for cervical cancer was combined with a meta-analysis of results abstracted from published reports of the trials. RESULTS Pooled survival rates from eight randomized trials that evaluated the role of cisplatin, alone or in combination with other chemotherapy agents, administered concurrently with external beam radiotherapy to patients with cervical cancer demonstrated a statistically significant effect in favour of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy without cisplatin (relative risk [RR] of death, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.86). The pooled RR of death among the six trials that enrolled only women with locally advanced cervical cancer was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.90). The pooled relative risk for the two trials in high-risk early-stage disease also demonstrated a statistically significant benefit for the addition of cisplatin-based chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RR=0.56; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.77). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis confirms that treatment with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy improves overall survival over various controls in women with locally advanced cervical cancer, large stage IB tumours (prior to surgery) and high-risk early-stage disease (following surgery). The variation in control treatments and the quality of their delivery among the randomized trials makes interpretation difficult. Nonetheless, the meta-analysis supports the use of concurrent cisplatin with radical radiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer.

[1]  J. Green Concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2004, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[2]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Crook,et al.  The importance of hemoglobin levels during radiotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix , 1999, Cancer.

[4]  R. Pearcey,et al.  Treatment of high-risk cervical cancer. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  B N Bundy,et al.  Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  B N Bundy,et al.  Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  B N Bundy,et al.  Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  P J Eifel,et al.  Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  G. Thomas Improved treatment for cervical cancer--concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Parmar,et al.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Christopher H Schmid,et al.  Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough , 1998, The Lancet.

[12]  G. Grégoire,et al.  Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Y. Soong,et al.  A randomized trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Prophylactic Extended-Field Irradiation of Para-aortic Lymph Nodes in Stages IIB and Bulky IB and IIA Cervical Carcinomas: Ten-Year Treatment Results of RTOG 79-20 , 1995 .

[15]  A. Fyles,et al.  The effect of treatment duration in the local control of cervix cancer. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  D. Choy,et al.  Long-term follow-up of potentiation of radiotherapy by cis-platinum in advanced cervical cancer. , 1989, Gynecologic oncology.

[17]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[18]  H. Shingleton,et al.  Hydroxyurea or placebo combined with radiation to treat stages IIIB and IV cervical cancer confined to the pelvis. , 1979, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  T. Choy,et al.  Potentiation of radiotherapy by cis-dichlorodiammine platinum (II) in advanced cervical carcinoma. , 1986, Gynecologic oncology.