J Gastric Cancer 2010;10(4):241-246 � DOI:10.5230/jgc.2010.10.4.241 Original Article The Early Experience of Laparoscopy-assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer at a Low-volume Center

Purpose Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) has become a technically feasible and safe procedure for early gastric cancer treatment. LAG is being increasingly performed in many centers; however, there have been few reports regarding LAG at low-volume centers. The aim of this study was to report our early experience with LAG in patients with gastric cancer at a low-volume center. Materials and Methods The clinicopathologic data and surgical outcomes of 39 patients who underwent LAG for gastric cancer between April 2007 and March 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Results The mean age was 68.3 years. Thirty-one patients had medical co-morbidities. The mean patient ASA score was 2.0. Among the 39 patients, 4 patients underwent total gastrectomies and 35 patients underwent distal gastrectomies. The mean blood loss was 145.4 ml and the mean operative time was 259.4 minutes. The mean time-to-first flatus, first oral intake, and the postoperative hospital stay was 2.8, 3.1, and 9.3 days, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Postoperative complications developed in 9 patients, as follows: anastomotic leakage, 1; wound infection, 1; gastric stasis, 2; postoperative ileus, 1; pneumonia, 1; cerebral infarction, 1; chronic renal failure, 1; and postoperative psychosis, 1. Conclusions LAG is technically feasible and can be performed safely at a low-volume center, but an experienced surgical team and careful patient selection are necessary. Furthermore, for early mastery of the learning curve for LAG, surgeons need education and training in addition to an accumulation of cases.

[1]  N. Tanigawa,et al.  Learning curve of laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer, a laparoscopic distal gastrectomy-based analysis , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  Sang-Uk Han,et al.  Complications with laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy: multivariate analysis of 300 consecutive cases , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  Norio Shiraishi,et al.  A Multicenter Study on Oncologic Outcome of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early Cancer in Japan , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[4]  Y. Kodera,et al.  Gastric cancer treated in 1991 in Japan: data analysis of nationwide registry , 2006, Gastric Cancer.

[5]  Min-Chan Kim,et al.  Learning curve of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer. , 2005, World journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  Young-Kyu Park,et al.  Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric carcinoma in elderly patients: a comparison with young patients. , 2005, World journal of gastroenterology.

[7]  I. Jeong,et al.  Multidimensional learning curve in laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  S. Choi,et al.  Analyses of Prognostic Factors and Gastric Cancer Specific Survival Rate in Early Gastric Cancer Patients and Its Clinical Implication , 2003 .

[9]  Hanjin Yang Nationwide Gastric Cancer Report in Korea , 2002 .

[10]  Y. Mok,et al.  Chronological Changes in the Clinical Features of Gastric Cancer , 2001 .

[11]  P. De Simone,et al.  The current role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of benign gastroduodenal diseases. , 1999, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[12]  S Kitano,et al.  Quality of life after laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[13]  A. Keats The ASA classification of physical status--a recapitulation. , 1978, Anesthesiology.