The influence of rating curve uncertainty on flood inundation predictions

The uncertainty of rating curves is well explored and understood in current literature. However, most estimations and methods are usually accompanied by a warning not to extrapolate the rating curve beyond a certain range. This is very often impossible for flooding events. Nevertheless, the uncertainty in using these rating curves for flood inundation models is usually ignored. In this paper we investigate the effect of uncertainty of rating curves on flood inundation predictions. The rating curve has been interpolated with two different equations, which are commonly used. The first method is based on a polynomial representation and the second method interpolates data points with the help of the Manning equation. A set of rating curves which represent the system equally well has been derived via the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) and the Multicomponent Mapping (M) methodology. The multiple rating curves have been used as upstream boundary of the one dimensional unsteady flow routing model HEC-RAS. The Manning roughness, as well as the model input, have been considered as uncertain and varied within a Monte Carlo framework. The model has been evaluated on inundation information retrieved from three different remote sensing sources. It has been shown that the boundary condition and thus the rating curve parameters have a significant impact on inundation predictions. The impact of the boundary condition depends on the hydrograph characteristics. Under some circumstances the quantification of the input uncertainty is more important than inundation model parameters.

[1]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system , 2002 .

[2]  Philippe Gourbesville,et al.  Rating curve modelling with Manning's equation to manage instability and improve extrapolation , 2000 .

[3]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Optimal use of high‐resolution topographic data in flood inundation models , 2003 .

[4]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  UNCERTAINTY IN CALIBRATING FLOOD PROPAGATION MODELS WITH FLOOD BOUNDARIES DERIVED FROM SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY , 2004 .

[5]  J Coulthard,et al.  Flow Measurement , 1985 .

[6]  Arthur Robert Schmidt,et al.  Analysis of Stage-Discharge Relations for Open -Channel Flows and Their Associated Uncertainties , 2002 .

[7]  S. E. Rantz,et al.  Measurement and computation of streamflow: Volume 1, Measurement of stage and discharge , 1982 .

[8]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data , 1998 .

[9]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  A decision support system for the analysis and use of stage-discharge rating curves , 1996 .

[10]  Patrice M. Pelletier,et al.  Uncertainties in the single determination of river discharge: a literature review , 1988 .

[11]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation , 2002 .

[12]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[13]  Keith Beven,et al.  Estimation of flood inundation probabilities as conditioned on event inundation maps , 2003 .

[14]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[15]  R. W. Herschy,et al.  The uncertainty in a current meter measurement , 2002 .

[16]  K. Beven,et al.  Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations , 2005 .