Mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers and composites proposed for internal fixation of bone.

The mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers and composites proposed for use in internal fixation (in place of stainless steel) are crucial to the performance of devices made from them for support of healing bone. To assess the reported range of properties and degradation rates, we searched and reviewed papers and abstracts published in English from 1980 through 1988. Mechanical property data were found for poly(lactic acid), poly(glycolic acid), poly(epsilon-caprolactone), polydioxanone, poly(ortho ester), poly(ethylene oxide), and/or their copolymers. Reports of composites based on several of these materials, reinforced with nondegradable and degradable fibers, were also found. The largest group of studies involved poly(lactic acid). Mechanical test methods varied widely, and studies of the degradation of mechanical properties were performed under a variety of conditions, mostly in vitro rather than in vivo. Compared to annealed stainless steel, unreinforced biodegradable polymers were initially up to 36% as strong in tension and 54% in bending, but only about 3% as stiff in either test mode. With fiber reinforcement, reported highest initial strengths exceeded that of stainless steel. Stiffness reached 62% of stainless steel with nondegradable carbon fibers, 15% with degradable inorganic fibers, but only 5% with degradable polymeric fibers. The slowest-degrading unreinforced biodegradable polymers were poly(L-lactic acid) and poly(ortho ester). Biodegradable composites with carbon or inorganic fibers generally lost strength rapidly, with a slower loss of stiffness, suggesting the difficulty of fiber-matrix coupling in these systems. The strength of composites reinforced with (lower modulus) degradable polymeric fibers decreased more slowly. Low implant stiffness might be expected to allow too much bone motion for satisfactory healing. However, unreinforced or degradable polymeric fiber reinforced materials have been used successfully clinically. The key has been careful selection of applications, plus use of designs and fixation methods distinctly different from those appropriate for stainless steel devices.

[1]  B. Tighe,et al.  Polymers for biodegradable medical devices. V. Hydroxybutyrate-hydroxyvalerate copolymers: effects of polymer processing on hydrolytic degradation. , 1990, Biomaterials.

[2]  D. Cohn,et al.  Biodegradable PEO/PLA block copolymers. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  T. Terjesen,et al.  The influence of different degrees of stiffness of fixation plates on experimental bone healing , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  J. R. Parsons,et al.  The design and analysis of a laminated partially degradable composite bone plate for fracture fixation. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  S. I. Belykh,et al.  Chemical and Physico-mechanical Aspects of Biocompatible Orthopaedic Polymer (BOP) in Bone Surgery , 1987, The Journal of international medical research.

[6]  G. Boering,et al.  Resorbable poly(L-lactide) plates and screws for the fixation of zygomatic fractures. , 1987, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[7]  O. Böstman,et al.  Biodegradable internal fixation for malleolar fractures. A prospective randomised trial. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  B. Tighe,et al.  Polymers for biodegradable medical devices. II. Hydroxybutyrate-hydroxyvalerate copolymers: hydrolytic degradation studies. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[9]  G. Boering,et al.  Resorbable materials of poly(L-lactide). VII. In vivo and in vitro degradation. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[10]  David F. Williams,et al.  On the biodegradation of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) homopolymer and poly-β-hydroxybutyrate-hydroxyvalerate copolymers , 1987 .

[11]  R. Langer,et al.  Poly(iminocarbonates) as potential biomaterials. , 1986, Biomaterials.

[12]  A. Owen Some dynamic mechanical properties of microbially produced poly-Β-hydroxybutyrate/Β-hydroxyvalerate copolymers , 1985 .

[13]  J. Dumbleton,et al.  The use of short carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic plates for fracture fixation. , 1985, Biomaterials.

[14]  C. X. Song,et al.  Synthesis and evaluation of biodegradable block copolymers of ε‐caprolactone and DL‐lactide , 1983 .

[15]  JULIAN F. Johnson,et al.  Influence of molecular weight and molecular weight distribution on mechanical properties of polymers , 1982 .

[16]  J. Szivek,et al.  A study of bone remodeling using metal-polymer laminates. , 1981, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  A. U. Daniels,et al.  Effects of flexural rigidity of plates on bone healing. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  S. Woo,et al.  A comparison of cortical bone atrophy secondary to fixation with plates with large differences in bending stiffness. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  A. Burstein,et al.  The Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone , 1974 .

[20]  F Leonard,et al.  Biodegradable poly(lactic acid) polymers. , 1971, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  J. Currey,et al.  The Mechanical Properties of Bone , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  D C Tunc,et al.  Body-absorbable osteosynthesis devices. , 1991, Clinical materials.

[23]  D. Cohn,et al.  Biodegradable PELA block copolymers: in vitro degradation and tissue reaction. , 1988, Biomaterials, artificial cells, and artificial organs.

[24]  P. Törmälä,et al.  The effect of a diagonally placed penetrating biodegradable implant on the epiphyseal plate. An experimental study on growing rabbits with special regard to polydioxanone , 1988 .

[25]  E. Mäkelä Healing of epiphyseal fracture fixed with a biodegradable polydioxanone implant or metallic pins. An experimental study on growing rabbits , 1988 .

[26]  P. Törmälä,et al.  Strength and strength retention in vitro, of absorbable, self-reinforced polyglycolide (PGA) rods for fracture fixation. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[27]  A. Tonino,et al.  The clinical use of plastic plates for osteosynthesis in human fractures , 1987 .

[28]  B. S. Kelley,et al.  Totally Resorbable High-Strength Composite Material , 1987 .

[29]  R. A. Miller,et al.  Synthesis and Properties of Polymers for Biodegradable Implants , 1987 .

[30]  P. Törmälä,et al.  The effects of fibre reinforcement and gold plating on the flexural and tensile strength of PGA/PLA copolymer materials in vitro. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[31]  G. Boering,et al.  Resorbable materials of poly(L-lactide). VI. Plates and screws for internal fracture fixation. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[32]  P. Christel,et al.  Totally Bioresorbable Composites Systems for Internal Fixation of Bone Fractures , 1986 .

[33]  S. Brown,et al.  Healing of femoral osteotomies with plastic plate fixation. , 1981, Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs.

[34]  R. Wehrenberg Lactic acid polymers: strong, degradable thermoplastics , 1981 .

[35]  N. Langrana,et al.  Development of new methods for phalangeal fracture fixation. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Strength of biological materials , 1970 .

[37]  F. G. Evans,et al.  The mechanical properties of bone. , 1969, Artificial limbs.

[38]  S. M. Cone PAGET'S OSTEITIS DEFORMANS IN RELATION TO CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE , 1933 .