Screening for amblyopia in preschool children: Results of a population-based, randomised controlled trial

Abstract INTRODUCTION The rationale for preschool vision screening programmes has recently been questioned. Evidence about the effects of early treatment is needed, but it is not known how early the target conditions can reliably be detected. In this study, an intensive programme comprising several different screening methods, used at different ages up to 37 months, was compared with the usual practice of visual surveillance and ad hoc referrals. METHODS Two groups were randomly selected from children in a population birth cohort study. The control group (n = 1461) received visual surveillance only. The intervention group (n = 2029) was offered in addition a programme of regular visual assessments by orthoptists testing visual acuity, ocular alignment, stereopsis and non-cycloplegic photorefraction. RESULTS The intervention group programme yielded more children with amblyopia (1.6% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.01), and was more specific (95% vs. 92%, p < 0.01), than the control programme. The individual components of the intervention programme were compared. The cover test and visual acuity tests were poorly sensitive until the children were 37 months, but were always >99% specific. Photorefraction was more sensitive than acuity testing at all ages below 37 months, with specificity >95% at 31 and 37 months. CONCLUSIONS Photorefraction would have detected more children less than 37 months of age with straight-eyed amblyopia than did visual acuity testing, but with more false positives. At 37 months, photore-fraction plus a cover test would have been comparable in effectiveness to visual acuity testing plus a cover test.

[1]  K. Simons.  Screening for visual defects in pre-school children. , 1987, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  T. Wiesel.  The postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment. , 1982, Bioscience reports.

[3]  J. Woodhouse,et al.  The Cardiff acuity test used for measuring visual acuity development in toddlers , 1994, Vision Research.

[4]  R. Wormald,et al.  Preschool vision screening in Cornwall: performance indicators of community orthoptists. , 1991, Archives of disease in childhood.

[5]  J. Lang.  A new stereotest. , 1983, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[6]  J. Golding.  Children of the Nineties: A resource for assessing the magnitude of long-term effects of prenatal, perinatal and subsequent events , 1996 .

[7]  S. Stewart-Brown,et al.  Preschool Vision Screening: Results of a Systematic Review , 1997 .

[8]  E. Aurell,et al.  A longitudinal study of children with a family history of strabismus: factors determining the incidence of strabismus. , 1990, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Woodhouse,et al.  The Cardiff Test: A New Visual Acuity Test for Toddlers and Children with Intellectual Impairment. A Preliminary Report , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  C. Minshull,et al.  The incidence and prevalence of amblyopia detected in childhood. , 1991, Public health.

[11]  H. Kay.  New method of assessing visual acuity with pictures. , 1983, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  A. Colver,et al.  Preschool vision screening. , 1991, Archives of disease in childhood.

[13]  A. Fielder.  Future of preschool vision screening. Review article did not separate review and implementation processes. , 1998, British medical journal.

[14]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Two infant vision screening programmes: Prediction and prevention of strabismus and amblyopia from photo- and videorefractive screening , 1996, Eye.

[15]  S. Stewart-Brown,et al.  Vision screening in preschool children: comparison of orthoptists and clinical medical officers as primary screeners. , 1991, BMJ.

[16]  A. Colver,et al.  The extended role of the new school doctor. , 1990, Archives of disease in childhood.

[17]  Lucy K Smith,et al.  The presentation of children with amblyopia , 1994, Eye.

[18]  S. Raza,et al.  Steroids in facial palsy due to herpes zoster , 1998, BMJ.

[19]  J. Sparrow,et al.  Screening for refractive errors with the Topcon PR2000 Pediatric Refractometer. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  A. Colver,et al.  Preschool vision screening: A prospective comparative evaluation , 1997, Eye.

[21]  R. Harrad,et al.  Methodology for a randomised controlled trial of preschool vision screening. A new approach with the 'ALSPAC' project. , 1996, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[22]  T. Wiesel.  Postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment , 1982, Nature.

[23]  J. Rahi,et al.  The future of preschool vision screening services in Britain , 1997, BMJ.

[24]  R. Ingram,et al.  Screening for visual defects in preschoolchildren. , 1986, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  T. Williamson,et al.  Assessment of an inner city visual screening programme for preschool children. , 1995, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  A A Assaf,et al.  The sensitive period: transfer of fixation after occlusion for strabismic amblyopia. , 1982, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  Janet Badcock.  Health for all children. , 1990, Archives of disease in childhood.

[28]  R. Ingram,et al.  Prediction of amblyopia and squint by means of refraction at age 1 year. , 1986, The British journal of ophthalmology.