The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism

Suicide terrorism is rising around the world, but the most common explanations do not help us understand why. Religious fanaticism does not explain why the world leader in suicide terrorism is the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, a group that adheres to a Marxist/Leninist ideology, while existing psychological explanations have been contradicted by the widening range of socio-economic backgrounds of suicide terrorists. To advance our understanding of this growing phenomenon, this study collects the universe of suicide terrorist attacks worldwide from 1980 to 2001, 188 in all. In contrast to the existing explanations, this study shows that suicide terrorism follows a strategic logic, one specifically designed to coerce modern liberal democracies to make significant territorial concessions. Moreover, over the past two decades, suicide terrorism has been rising largely because terrorists have learned that it pays. Suicide terrorists sought to compel American and French military forces to abandon Lebanon in 1983, Israeli forces to leave Lebanon in 1985, Israeli forces to quit the Gaza Strip and the West Bank in 1994 and 1995, the Sri Lankan government to create an independent Tamil state from 1990 on, and the Turkish government to grant autonomy to the Kurds in the late 1990s. In all but the case of Turkey, the terrorist political cause made more gains after the resort to suicide operations than it had before. Thus, Western democracies should pursue policies that teach terrorists that the lesson of the 1980s and 1990s no longer holds, policies which in practice may have more to do with improving homeland security than with offensive military action.I thank Robert Art, Mia Bloom, Steven Cícala, Alex Downs, Daniel Drezner, Adria Lawrence, Sean Lynn-Jones, John Mearsheimer, Michael O'Connor, Sebastian Rosato, Lisa Weeden, the anonymous reviewers, and the members of the program on International Security Policy at the University of Chicago for their superb comments. I especially thank James K. Feldman and Chaim D. Kaufmann for their excellent comments on multiple drafts. I would also like to acknowledge encouragement from the committee for the Combating Political Violence paper competition sponsored by the Institute for War and Peace Studies at Columbia University, which selected an earlier version as a winning paper.

[1]  M. Bowker Russia and Chechnya: the issue of secession† , 2004 .

[2]  A. Oberschall Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process , 2004 .

[3]  Max Abrahms,et al.  Are Terrorists Really Rational? The Palestinian Example , 2004 .

[4]  Rabin and Israel's National Security , 2002 .

[5]  R. Schechner The Age of Terrorism , 2002, TDR/The Drama Review.

[6]  O. Róbert Rabin and Israel's National Security , 2001 .

[7]  Michael Horowitz,et al.  When Does Aerial Bombing Work? , 2001 .

[8]  B. Weingast,et al.  Vicious Cycles: Endogenous Political Extremism and Political Violence , 2000 .

[9]  L. Brown,et al.  Hamas: Political Thought and Practice , 2000 .

[10]  Osama bin Laden Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders , 1998 .

[11]  Chaim Kaufmann,et al.  When All Else Fails: Ethnic Population Transfers and Partitions in the Twentieth Century , 1998, International Security.

[12]  R. Pape,et al.  Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work , 1997, International Security.

[13]  M. Kramer Fundamentalist Islam at Large: The Drive for Power , 1996 .

[14]  Chaim Kaufmann,et al.  Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars , 1996, International Security.

[15]  Jacob Bercovitch,et al.  Some Conceptual Issues and Empirical Trends in the Study of Successful Mediation in International Relations , 1991 .

[16]  David C. Rapoport Fear and Trembling: Terrorism in Three Religious Traditions , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[17]  K. Crittenden,et al.  Sociological Aspects of Attribution , 1983 .

[18]  R. Lebow Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis , 1982 .

[19]  T. Schelling ARMS AND INFLUENCE , 1967, Sam Nunn.

[20]  R. Adamo,et al.  The Assassins , 1931 .

[21]  Søren Kierkegaard,et al.  Fear and Trembling , 1843 .

[22]  Richard J. Norton The United States and Coercive Diplomacy , 2004 .

[23]  Richard A. Clarke,et al.  Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror , 2004 .

[24]  A. Sela,et al.  The Palestinian Hamas , 2000 .

[25]  R. Rob Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American , 1999 .

[26]  S. F. Actory,et al.  A stochastic view of lymphocyte motility and trafficking within the lymph node , 2003, Immunological reviews.

[27]  E. Cohen,et al.  Bombing to win : air power and coercion in war , 1996 .

[28]  S. Huntington The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century , 1991 .

[29]  Jerrold M. Post,et al.  Terrorist psycho-logic: Terrorist behavior as a product of psychological forces. , 1990 .

[30]  Andrew J. Pierre,et al.  Origins of Terrorism , 1990 .

[31]  Ronald Reagan,et al.  An American life , 1990 .

[32]  M. Kramer The moral logic of Hizballah , 1987 .

[33]  M Comay,et al.  Political terrorism. , 1976, Mental health and society.

[34]  R. Jervis Perception and misperception in international politics , 1976 .

[35]  R. Clutterbuck Living with terrorism , 1975 .

[36]  C. Baumann The Diplomatic Kidnappings: A Revolutionary Tactic of Urban Terrorism , 1973 .

[37]  A. George The Limits Of Coercive Diplomacy , 1971 .

[38]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[39]  R. Niebuhr Moral Man and Immoral Society , 1932 .

[40]  Laurence M. Sears,et al.  Moral Man and Immoral Society , 1932 .