Refining individualized consideration: Distinguishing developmental leadership and supportive leadership

This study explores the theoretical and empirical distinction between developmental leadership and supportive leadership, which are currently encompassed in a single sub dimension of transformational leadership, individualized consideration. Items were selected to assess these constructs, and hypotheses regarding the differential effects of developmental and supportive leadership were proposed. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the proposed distinction between developmental and supportive leadership, although these leadership factors were very strongly associated. Structural equation modelling and multi-level modelling results indicated that both developmental leadership and supportive leadership displayed unique relationships with theoretically selected outcome measures. Developmental leadership displayed significantly stronger relationships with job satisfaction, career certainty, affective commitment to the organization and role breadth self-efficacy than did supportive leadership. Results provide initial evidence in support of the discriminant validity of these two types of leadership. Discussion focuses on the need to further examine the construct of developmental leadership.

[1]  Steven J. Breckler,et al.  Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes , 1989 .

[2]  G. Yukl.  An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. , 1999 .

[3]  B. Bass,et al.  Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. , 1995 .

[4]  Paul E. Spector.  Job satisfaction: application, assessment, cause, and consequences , 1997 .

[5]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[6]  P. Iles.  Sustainable high‐potential career development: a resource‐based view , 1997 .

[7]  A. Brief,et al.  Organizational behavior: affect in the workplace. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  L. J. Williams,et al.  An Alternative Approach to Method Effects by Using Latent-Variable Models: Applications in Organizational Behavior Research , 1994 .

[10]  R. H. Waterman,et al.  Toward a career-resilient workforce , 1994 .

[11]  Cynthia D. Fisher,et al.  Mood and emotions while working: missing pieces of job satisfaction? , 2000 .

[12]  Paul J. Kobulnicky,et al.  Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application , 1998 .

[13]  T. Wills,et al.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  J. Barbuto.  Taking the Charisma Out of Transformational Leadership , 1997 .

[15]  M. Griffin,et al.  Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions , 2004 .

[16]  J. C. Wofford,et al.  Path-Goal Theories of Leadership: A Meta-Analysis , 1993 .

[17]  Wayne M. Wormley,et al.  Effects of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Performance Evaluations, and Career Outcomes , 1990 .

[18]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[19]  R. J. House,et al.  A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness , 1971 .

[20]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Constellations and Careers: Toward Understanding the Effects of Multiple Developmental Relationships , 2001 .

[21]  Terry A. Beehr,et al.  Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationships: differences in perceptions and impact , 2003 .

[22]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[23]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. , 2000 .

[24]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  Setting the stage for effective leadership: Antecedents of transformational leadership behavior , 2004 .

[25]  M. Arthur,et al.  The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory , 1993 .

[26]  Kevin B. Lowe,et al.  Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the mlq literature , 1996 .

[27]  S. Parker,et al.  Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  J. French,et al.  Job demands and worker health : main effects and occupational differences , 1980 .

[29]  S. Parker.  From Passive to Proactive Motivation: The Importance of Flexible Role Orientations and Role Breadth Self‐efficacy , 2000 .

[30]  John P. Meyer,et al.  AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE, AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS, CORRELATES, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2002 .

[31]  K. Kram.  Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life , 1985 .

[32]  B. Bass,et al.  Superiors' evaluations and subordinates' perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. , 1988 .

[33]  J. House.  Work stress and social support , 1981 .

[34]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[35]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[36]  James C. Sarros,et al.  Leadership and its impact on organizational culture , 2002 .

[37]  Longitudinal Examination of Mentoring Relationships on Organizational Commitment and Citizenship Behavior , 2000 .

[38]  K. Kram.  Phases of the mentor relationship. , 1983 .

[39]  Robert L. Kahn,et al.  Stress in organizations. , 1992 .

[40]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment , 1990 .

[41]  P. Cappelli.  Career Jobs are Dead , 1999 .

[42]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  A user's guide to MLwiN, Version 1.0 , 1998 .

[43]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors , 1996 .

[44]  A. Bryman.  Charisma And Leadership In Organizations , 1993 .

[45]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[46]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  B. Bass.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[48]  M. Aiken,et al.  Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. , 1967 .

[49]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  Mark L. Poteet,et al.  Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégeé: a meta-analysis. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  B. Bass.  Two Decades of Research and Development in Transformational Leadership , 1999 .

[53]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PREDICTORS OF EXECUTIVE CAREER SUCCESS , 1995 .

[54]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Does Mentor-Protégé Agreement on Mentor Leadership Behavior Influence the Quality of a Mentoring Relationship? , 2000 .