Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty component center of rotation affects muscle function.

BACKGROUND Medialization of the glenohumeral center of rotation alters the moment arm of the deltoid, can affect muscle function, and increases the risk for scapular notching due to impingement. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of position of the glenosphere on deltoid efficiency and the range of glenohumeral adduction. METHODS Scapulohumeral bone models were reconstructed from computed tomography scans and virtually implanted with primary or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implants. The placement of the glenosphere was varied to simulate differing degrees of "medialization" and inferior placement relative to the glenoid. Muscle and joint forces were computed during shoulder abduction in OpenSim musculoskeletal modeling software. RESULTS The average glenohumeral joint reaction forces for the primary total shoulder arthroplasty were within 5% of those previously reported in vivo. Superior placement or full lateralization of the glenosphere increased glenohumeral joint reaction forces by 10% and 18%, respectively, relative to the recommended reverse total shoulder arthroplasty position. The moment arm of the deltoid muscle was the highest at the recommended baseline surgical position. The baseline glenosphere position resulted in a glenohumeral adduction deficit averaging more than 10° that increased to more than 25° when the glenosphere was placed superiorly. Only with full lateralization was glenohumeral adduction unaffected by superoinferior placement. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Selecting optimum placement of the glenosphere involves tradeoffs in bending moment at the implant-bone interface, risk for impingement, and deltoid efficiency. A viable option is partially medializing the glenosphere, which retains most of the benefits of deltoid efficiency and reduces the risk for scapular notching.

[1]  D. Pupello,et al.  Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Scott Banks,et al.  Initial glenoid component fixation in "reverse" total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  E A Audenaert,et al.  Shoulder prostheses treating cuff tear arthropathy: A comparative biomechanical study , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  P. Grammont,et al.  Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. , 1993, Orthopedics.

[6]  Christian Gerber,et al.  Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[7]  Matthew Vasey,et al.  The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  Jonathan C. Levy,et al.  Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[9]  C Gerber,et al.  Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Jonathan C. Levy,et al.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Gross and Microscopic Anatomy , 2001 .

[12]  Daniel Vélez Día,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .

[13]  D. D’Lima,et al.  Optimizing glenoid component position using three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[14]  Matthew Vasey,et al.  The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  J. Clark,et al.  Tendons, ligaments, and capsule of the rotator cuff. Gross and microscopic anatomy. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Pascal Boileau,et al.  Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[17]  F. Kerschbaumer,et al.  Grammont reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and nonreconstructible rotator cuff lesions. , 2001, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[18]  J. Scales,et al.  The Stanmore total shoulder replacement. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  M. Post Constrained arthroplasty of the shoulder. , 1987, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[20]  Charalambos P. Charalambous,et al.  Normal and Abnormal Motion of the Shoulder , 2014 .

[21]  A Rohlmann,et al.  In vivo glenohumeral contact forces--measurements in the first patient 7 months postoperatively. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.