Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) models have demonstrated the influencing factors of information systems by using behavioral intention as one of the aspect to measure the use of information systems. In line with that, this approach is also supported by updated DeLone & McLean information success model by adding the intention to use variable in their famous Information Systems Success Model as a predecessor variable in order to measure the use of information systems. However, in the context of behavioral intention or intention to use, there has been very little effort to investigate the influences of individual differences towards intention to use information systems. This is true in the context of digital library in Malaysia specifically and in the developing countries, generally. This paper investigates the influences of age, gender, race, mode of study, universities and academic structure differences towards intention to use digital library (IUDL) by Malaysian postgraduate students who are in Malaysian research intensive universities. The result shows there is evidence of a significant difference in meanscore intention to use digital library (IUDL) between Malay and Chinese and between Chinese and Other races. However, there is no evidence of a significant difference in meanscore intention to use digital library (IUDL) between mode of studies, universities and academic programs. These results provided a proof to confirm the race difference is influencing factor in measuring the intention to use digital library while mode of study, universities and academic structure differences are does not a matter in measuring the intention to use digital library. Furthermore, this paper provides some suggestion in order to minimize the differences intention to use digital library among users.
[1]
Hazem M. El-Bakry,et al.
Adaptive User Interface for Web Applications
,
2010
.
[2]
Sherry Y. Chen,et al.
Evaluation of user satisfaction with digital library interfaces
,
2005
.
[3]
Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.
The relationship between race and library anxiety among graduate students: A replication study
,
2006,
Inf. Process. Manag..
[4]
Edward A. Fox,et al.
Digital libraries: introduction
,
1995,
SIGO.
[5]
R. K. Sharma,et al.
Digital libraries: development and challenges
,
2001
.
[6]
Adem Karahoca,et al.
Individual differences in usability of cell phone SMS menus
,
2006
.
[7]
Christine L. Borgman,et al.
What are Digital Libraries? Competing Visions
,
1999,
Inf. Process. Manag..
[8]
Kieran Mathieson,et al.
Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior
,
1991,
Inf. Syst. Res..
[9]
Kim Guenther.
Publicity through Better Web Site Design.
,
1999
.
[10]
Edward A. Fox,et al.
Digital libraries
,
1995,
CACM.
[11]
Zorana Ercegovac,et al.
The interpretations of library use in the age of digital libraries: Virtualizing the name
,
1997
.