Benchmarking as an action research process

This study participates in the debate on advancing theoretical developments in the field of benchmarking processes. It suggests that approaching benchmarking as a research method helps to explicate the basis of benchmarking processes and at the same time offers tools for scientific research in this field. Adopting an interpretative, comparative concept analysis the study approaches benchmarking as an action research. The results indicate that benchmarking might be regarded as a special kind of action research; however, in that case, more attention would need to be addressed to the preliminary planning, observation, reflection and the use of theoretical frames, all of which are essential for distinguishing a scientifically‐conducted action research process from practical work. Thus, adopting an action research approach might improve the implementation as well as the theoretical foundation of the benchmarking process.

[1]  Paul Davis,et al.  The burgeoning of benchmarking in British local government: The value of “learning by looking” in the public services , 1998 .

[2]  J. Mezirow A Critical Theory of Adult Learning and Education , 1981 .

[3]  D. Longbottom Benchmarking in the UK: an empirical study of practitioners and academics , 2000 .

[4]  J. Dewey Experience and Education , 1938 .

[5]  Mahmoud M. Yasin,et al.  The theory and practice of benchmarking: then and now , 2002 .

[6]  Robert Jones,et al.  The role of benchmarking within the cultural reform journey of an award‐winning Australian local authority , 1999 .

[7]  J. Carlos Prado Prado,et al.  Benchmarking for the development of quality assurance systems , 2001 .

[8]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  The application of graphical techniques in evaluating benchmarking partners , 2000 .

[9]  Dennis F. X. Mathaisel,et al.  A paradigm for benchmarking lean initiatives for quality improvement , 2000 .

[10]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Benchmarking process formalization and a case study , 1998 .

[11]  Gregory H. Watson,et al.  Strategic Benchmarking: How to Rate Your Company's Performance against the World's Best , 1993 .

[12]  M. Hammer,et al.  REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION , 1995 .

[13]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  A review of key publications on benchmarking part I , 1995 .

[14]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  A review of key publications on benchmarking: part II , 1996 .

[15]  Ian P. McCarthy,et al.  An evolutionary approach to benchmarking , 2001 .

[16]  A. Ball,et al.  Benchmarking in local government under a central government agenda , 2000 .

[17]  Faizul Huq,et al.  Benchmarking – best practices: an integrated approach , 1999 .

[18]  D. Elmuti,et al.  An overview of benchmarking process: a tool for continuous improvement and competitive advantage , 1997 .

[19]  Luiz Cesar Ribeiro Carpinetti,et al.  What to benchmark , 2002 .

[20]  Anneli Sarvimaki Knowledge in Interactive Practice Disciplines. An Analysis of Knowledge in Education and Health Care. Research Bulletin 68. , 1988 .

[21]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  The transfer of best practices: how to build a culture of benchmarking and continuous learning – part 2 , 2000 .

[22]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  The transfer of best practices: how to build a culture of benchmarking and continuous learning – part 1 , 2000 .

[23]  Anneli Sarvimäki,et al.  Knowledge in interactive practice disciplines : an analysis of knowledge in education and health care , 1988 .

[24]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[25]  Paula Kyrö,et al.  Revising the concept and forms of benchmarking , 2003 .

[26]  Stephen Kemmis Emancipatory Aspirations in a Postmodern Era , 1995 .

[27]  Pervaiz K. Ahmed,et al.  Integrated benchmarking: a holistic examination of select techniques for benchmarking analysis , 1998 .