Effect of instruction and motivation in the use of electric and manual toothbrushes in periodontal patients. A comparative study.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of manual and electric toothbrushes in plaque control in periodontal patients after proper instructions. Thirty six periodontal patients (mean age of 49 years, 21 females and 15 males) were included and completed the study (100% compliance). A single-blinded, randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical design was adopted, with the patients using during 2 periods of 14 days each the manual and/or electric toothbrush. Four subgroups of 9 individuals were studied: A1--used manual toothbrush in both experimental periods; A2--used the manual toothbrush during the first period and the electrical toothbrush during the second period; B1--used electrical toothbrush during both periods; B2--used the electrical toothbrush in the first period and the manual one in the second period. Brushing was performed during 14 days and at day 14 and 28 it was performed in the clinic, and timing of brushing was recorded without patients being aware. The Plaque Index (Silness, Löe, 1964) was used. Intra-group comparisons were performed by paired t-test and inter-group comparisons by independent sample t-test, with an alpha level of 0.05. The results showed no difference between the tested brushes neither for plaque nor for timing. However, re-instruction was detected as an important factor, since for all groups the second period, after reinstruction, showed lower plaque scores. It is concluded that professional advice and instruction and re-instruction seem more important in order to obtain good plaque control than the choice of toothbrush in subjects with periodontal disease.

[1]  P. Gjermo,et al.  Comparison of oral hygiene efficacy of one manual and two electric toothbrushes , 2000, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[2]  K. Stoltze,et al.  Comparison of a manual and a new electric toothbrush for controlling plaque and gingivitis. , 1994, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[3]  C. Barnes,et al.  A comparison of the Braun Oral-B Plaque Remover (D5) electric and a manual toothbrush in affecting gingivitis. , 1993, The Journal of clinical dentistry.

[4]  G. Armitage,et al.  Comparison of manual and power toothbrushing, with and without adjunctive oral irrigation, for controlling plaque and gingivitis. , 1989, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  R. Boyd,et al.  Effect on periodontal status of rotary electric toothbrushes vs. manual toothbrushes during periodontal maintenance. I. Clinical results. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.

[6]  R. Boyd,et al.  Effect of periodontal status of rotary electric toothbrushes vs. manual toothbrushes during periodontal maintenance. II. Microbiological results. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  M. Niemi Gingival abrasion and plaque removal after toothbrushing with an electric and a manual toothbrush. , 1987, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[8]  P Axelsson,et al.  Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults. , 1978, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[9]  J. Mccall The world workshop in periodontics. , 1967, Journal of periodontology.

[10]  H. Löe,et al.  PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. I. PREVALENCE AND SEVERITY. , 1963, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[11]  G A QUIGLEY,et al.  Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. , 1962, Journal of the American Dental Association.