On the Selection of Distributions for Stochastic Variables

One of the main steps in an uncertainty analysis is the selection of appropriate probability distribution functions for all stochastic variables. In this paper, criteria for such selections are reviewed, the most important among them being any a priori knowledge about the nature of a stochastic variable, and the Central Limit Theorem of probability theory applied to sums and products of stochastic variables. In applications of these criteria, it is shown that many of the popular selections, such as the uniform distribution for a poorly known variable, require far more knowledge than is actually available. However, the knowledge available is usually sufficient to make use of other, more appropriate distributions. Next, functions of stochastic variables and the selection of probability distributions for their arguments as well as the use of different methods of error propagation through these functions are discussed. From these evaluations, priorities can be assigned to determine which of the stochastic variables in a function need the most care in selecting the type of distribution and its parameters. Finally, a method is proposed to assist in the assignment of an appropriate distribution which is commensurate with the total information on a particular stochastic variable, and is based on the scientific method. Two examples are given to elucidate the method for cases of little or almost no information.

[1]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[2]  L. Fenton The Sum of Log-Normal Probability Distributions in Scatter Transmission Systems , 1960 .

[3]  J S Evans,et al.  The effect of neglecting correlations when propagating uncertainty and estimating the population distribution of risk. , 1992, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  J. Naus The Distribution of the Logarithm of the Sum of Two Log-Normal Variates , 1969 .

[5]  Peter K. LaGoy,et al.  Significant Figures in Risk Assessment: More Caution Is Warranted , 1989 .

[6]  T. Webler,et al.  A novel approach to reducing uncertainty: The group Delphi☆ , 1991 .

[7]  D. C. Cox,et al.  Methods for Uncertainty Analysis: A Comparative Survey , 1981 .

[8]  M. Bunge Causality and modern science , 1979 .

[9]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  Risk methodology for geologic disposal of radioactive waste: small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment , 1980 .

[10]  A. I. Shlyakhter,et al.  An improved framework for uncertainty analysis: Accounting for unsuspected errors , 1994 .

[11]  J. C. Helton,et al.  An Investigation of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models , 1988 .

[12]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Error Propagation for Large Errors , 1987 .

[13]  M. W. Merkhofer,et al.  Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: Methodology, experiences, and insights , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.