Optimal spatial resolution of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-acquired imagery for species classification in a heterogeneous grassland ecosystem

Species composition is an essential biophysical attribute of vegetative ecosystems. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-acquired imagery with ultrahigh spatial resolution is a valuable data source for investigating species composition at a fine scale, which is extremely important for species-mixed ecosystems (e.g., grasslands and wetlands). However, the ultrahigh spatial resolution of UAV imagery also poses challenges in species classification since the imagery captures very detailed information of ground features (e.g., gaps, shadow) which would add substantial noise to image classification. In this study, we obtained multi-temporal UAV imagery with 5 cm resolution and resampled them to acquire imagery with 10, 15, and 20 cm resolution. The images were then utilized for species classification using Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) aiming to assess the influence of different imagery spatial resolution on the classification accuracy. Results show that the overall classification accuracy of imagery with 5, 10, and 15 cm resolution are close, while the classification accuracy on 20-cm imagery is much lower. These results are expected because the object features (e.g., vegetation index values and standard deviation) of same species vary slightly between 5 and 15 cm resolution, but not at the 20-cm resolution. We also found that the same species show different producer’s and user’s accuracy when using imagery with different spatial resolutions. These results suggest that it is essential to select the optimal spatial resolution of imagery for investigating a vegetative ecosystem of interest.

[1]  André Stumpf,et al.  Object-oriented mapping of landslides using Random Forests , 2011 .

[2]  R. Meentemeyer,et al.  Object-based assessment of burn severity in diseased forests using high-spatial and high-spectral resolution MASTER airborne imagery , 2015 .

[3]  Gang Chen,et al.  Assessment of the image misregistration effects on object-based change detection , 2014 .

[4]  E. L. Geiger,et al.  Discrimination of invaded and native species sites in a semi‐desert grassland using MODIS multi‐temporal data , 2009 .

[5]  Mary E. Martin,et al.  Determining Forest Species Composition Using High Spectral Resolution Remote Sensing Data , 1998 .

[6]  L. Bertalan,et al.  UAS photogrammetry and object-based image analysis (GEOBIA): erosion monitoring at the Kazár badland, Hungary , 2016 .

[7]  Dirk Tiede,et al.  ESP: a tool to estimate scale parameter for multiresolution image segmentation of remotely sensed data , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Mario Chica-Olmo,et al.  An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification , 2012 .

[9]  P. Vitousek,et al.  The Effects of Plant Composition and Diversity on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[10]  F. López-Granados,et al.  Weed Mapping in Early-Season Maize Fields Using Object-Based Analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Images , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Yuhong He,et al.  Investigating species composition in a temperate grassland using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-acquired imagery , 2016, 2016 4th International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications (EORSA).

[12]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  Tree Species Classification in Boreal Forests With Hyperspectral Data , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  T. Kleinebecker,et al.  Unmanned aerial vehicles as innovative remote sensing platforms for high‐resolution infrared imagery to support restoration monitoring in cut‐over bogs , 2013 .

[14]  Mariana Belgiu,et al.  Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions , 2016 .

[15]  Geoffrey J. Hay,et al.  Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA): A new name for a new discipline , 2008 .

[16]  Albert Rango,et al.  Texture and Scale in Object-Based Analysis of Subdecimeter Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  J. R. Jensen Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective , 2000 .

[18]  Yuhong He,et al.  Species classification using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-acquired high spatial resolution imagery in a heterogeneous grassland , 2017 .

[19]  Ryan R. Jensen,et al.  Small-Scale Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Environmental Remote Sensing: Challenges and Opportunities , 2011 .

[20]  Lei Ma,et al.  Training set size, scale, and features in Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis of very high resolution unmanned aerial vehicle imagery , 2015 .

[21]  A. Rango,et al.  Image Processing and Classification Procedures for Analysis of Sub-decimeter Imagery Acquired with an Unmanned Aircraft over Arid Rangelands , 2011 .

[22]  Heather M. Cheshire,et al.  A comparison of single date and multitemporal satellite image classifications in a semi-arid grassland , 2001 .

[23]  S. McNaughton,et al.  Multi‐scale analysis of plant species richness in Serengeti grasslands , 2007 .

[24]  André Stumpf,et al.  bject-oriented mapping of urban trees using Random Forest lassifiers , 2013 .

[25]  K. Hall,et al.  Inventorying management status and plant species richness in semi-natural grasslands using high spatial resolution imagery , 2010 .

[26]  Ryan R. Jensen,et al.  Introduction—Small-Scale Unmanned Aerial Systems for Environmental Remote Sensing , 2011 .

[27]  Stephan Nebiker,et al.  A LIGHT-WEIGHT MULTISPECTRAL SENSOR FOR MICRO UAV – OPPORTUNITIES FOR VERY HIGH RESOLUTION AIRBORNE REMOTE SENSING , 2008 .