FLUORESCENCE‐BASED MAXIMAL QUANTUM YIELD FOR PSII AS A DIAGNOSTIC OF NUTRIENT STRESS

In biological oceanography, it has been widely accepted that the maximum quantum yield of photosynthesis is influenced by nutrient stress. A closely related parameter, the maximum quantum yield for stable charge separation of PSII, (φPSII)m, can be estimated by measuring the increase in fluorescence yield from dark‐adapted minimal fluorescence (Fo) to maximal fluorescence (Fm) associated with the closing of photosynthetic reaction centers with saturating light or with a photosynthetic inhibitor such as 3′‐(3,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐1′,1′‐dimethyl urea (DCMU). The ratio Fv/Fm (= (Fm− Fo)/Fm) is thus used as a diagnostic of nutrient stress. Published results indicate that Fv/Fm is depressed for nutrient‐stressed phytoplankton, both during nutrient starvation (unbalanced growth) and acclimated nutrient limitation (steady‐state or balanced growth). In contrast to published results, fluorescence measurements from our laboratory indicate that Fv/Fm is high and insensitive to nutrient limitation for cultures in steady state under a wide range of relative growth rates and irradiance levels. This discrepancy between results could be attributed to differences in measurement systems or to differences in growth conditions. To resolve the uncertainty about Fv/Fm as a diagnostic of nutrient stress, we grew the neritic diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana (Hustedt) Hasle et Heimdal under nutrient‐replete and nutrient‐stressed conditions, using replicate semicontinuous, batch, and continuous cultures. Fv/Fm was determined using a conventional fluorometer and DCMU and with a pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorometer. Reduction of excitation irradiance in the conventional fluorometer eliminated overestimation of Fo in the DCMU methodology for cultures grown at lower light levels, and for a large range of growth conditions there was a strong correlation between the measurements of Fv/Fm with DCMU and PAM (r2 = 0.77, n = 460). Consistent with the literature, nutrient‐replete cultures showed consistently high Fv/Fm (∼0.65), independent of growth irradiance. Under nutrient‐starved (batch culture and perturbed steady state) conditions, Fv/Fm was significantly correlated to time without the limiting nutrient and to nutrient‐limited growth rate before starvation. In contrast to published results, our continuous culture experiments showed that Fv/Fm was not a good measure of nutrient limitation under balanced growth conditions and remained constant (∼0.65) and independent of nutrient‐limited growth rate under different irradiance levels. Because variable fluorescence can only be used as a diagnostic for nutrient‐starved unbalanced growth conditions, a robust measure of nutrient stressed oceanic waters is still required.

[1]  B. Shuter,et al.  A model of physiological adaptation in unicellular algae. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  P. Richerson,et al.  Photoinhibition and the diurnal variation of phytoplankton photosynthesis—I. Development of a photosynthesis—irradiance model from studies of in situ responses , 1987 .

[3]  Lisa M. Graziano,et al.  Nitrogen limitation of North Atlantic phytoplankton: analysis of physiological condition in nutrient enrichment experiments , 1996 .

[4]  M. Olaizola,et al.  SHORT‐TERM RESPONSE OF THE DIADINOXANTHIN CYCLE AND FLUORESCENCE YIELD TO HIGH IRRADIANCE IN CHAETOCEROS MUELLERI (BACILLARIOPHYCEAE) 1 , 1994 .

[5]  Richard C. Dugdale,et al.  NUTRIENT LIMITATION IN THE SEA: DYNAMICS, IDENTIFICATION, AND SIGNIFICANCE1 , 1967 .

[6]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Nitrogen- and irradiance-dependent variations of the maximum quantum yield of carbon fixation in eutrophic, mesotrophic and oligotrophic marine systems , 1996 .

[7]  Trevor Platt,et al.  Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton , 1976 .

[8]  P. Richerson,et al.  Contemporaneous disequilibrium, a new hypothesis to explain the "paradox of the plankton". , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Perry,et al.  Quantum yield, relative specific absorption and fluorescence in nitrogen-limited Chaetoceros gracilis , 1987 .

[10]  P. Falkowski,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS ON PHYTOPLANKTON PRODUCTIVITY IN THE OCEAN , 1992 .

[11]  Hugh L. MacIntyre,et al.  Fluorescence assessment of the maximum quantum efficiency of photosynthesis in the western North Atlantic , 1993 .

[12]  Paul J. Harrison,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL ACCLIMATION OF MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON TO DIFFERENT NITROGEN SOURCES 1 , 1993 .

[13]  P. Falkowski Molecular Ecology of Phytoplankton Photosynthesis , 1992 .

[14]  G. Krause,et al.  Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis: The Basics , 1991 .

[15]  Joseph A. Berry,et al.  Quantum efficiency of Photosystem II in relation to ‘energy’-dependent quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence , 1987 .

[16]  J. C. Goldman Physiological Processes, Nutrient Availability, and the Concept of Relative Growth Rate in Marine Phytoplankton Ecology , 1980 .

[17]  Manfred Ehrhardt,et al.  Methods of seawater analysis , 1999 .

[18]  Bas W Ibelings,et al.  Acclimation of photosystem II in a cyanobacterium and a eukaryotic green alga to high and fluctuating photosynthetic photon flux densities, simulating light regimes induced by mixing in lakes. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[19]  B. Gentili,et al.  Remote sensing of sea surface Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: consequences of natural variations in the optical characteristics of phytoplankton and the quantum yield of chlorophyll a fluorescence , 1996 .

[20]  I. Berman‐Frank,et al.  Balanced Growth in Aquatic Plants: Myth or Reality? , 1999 .

[21]  T. Parsons,et al.  A practical handbook of seawater analysis , 1968 .

[22]  T. G. Owens Energy Transformation and Fluorescence in Photosynthesis , 1991 .

[23]  Hugh L. MacIntyre,et al.  A dynamic model of photoadaptation in phytoplankton , 1996 .

[24]  J. Marra Effect of short-term variations in light intensity on photosynthesis of a marine phytoplankter: A laboratory simulation study , 1978 .

[25]  Hugh L. MacIntyre,et al.  Nutrient Limitation of Marine Photosynthesis , 1992 .

[26]  W. Richard,et al.  TEMPERATURE AND PHYTOPLANKTON GROWTH IN THE SEA , 1972 .

[27]  G. Öquist,et al.  A Method for Studying Photosynthetic Capacities of Unicellular Algae Based on in vivo Chlorophyll Fluorescence , 1977 .

[28]  C. Langdon On the causes of interspecific differences in the growth-irradiance relationship for phytoplankton. II. A general review , 1988 .

[29]  U. Schreiber,et al.  Assessment of photosystem II photochemical quantum yield by chlorophyll fluorescence quenching analysis , 1995 .

[30]  J. Cullen,et al.  Continuous measurement of the DCMU-induced fluorescence response of natural phytoplankton populations , 1979 .

[31]  R. Eppley,et al.  Estimating Phytoplankton Growth Rates in the Central Oligotrophic Oceans , 1980 .

[32]  J. Kromkamp,et al.  Light dependence of quantum yields for PSII charge separation and oxygen evolution in eucaryotic algae , 1998 .

[33]  Paul G. Falkowski,et al.  Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea , 1992 .

[34]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Effects of Growth Irradiance and Nitrogen Limitation on Photosynthetic Energy Conversion in Photosystem II. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[35]  M. D. Keller,et al.  MEDIA FOR THE CULTURE OF OCEANIC ULTRAPHYTOPLANKTON 1,2 , 1987 .

[36]  Z. Dubinsky The Functional and Optical Absorption Cross-Sections of Phytoplankton Photosynthesis , 1992 .

[37]  L. Legendre,et al.  DCMU-enhanced fluorescence as an index of photosynthetic activity in phytoplankton , 1979 .

[38]  A. Cembella,et al.  Vertical migration, nutrition and toxicity in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense , 1997 .

[39]  J. Briantais,et al.  The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence , 1989 .

[40]  B. Prézelin,et al.  Characterization of Photosynthetic Rhythms in Marine Dinoflagellates: II. Photosynthesis-Irradiance Curves and in Vivo Chlorophyll a Fluorescence. , 1977, Plant physiology.

[41]  Graham P. Harris,et al.  Photosynthesis, productivity and growth, the physiological ecology of phytoplankton , 1978 .

[42]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Advances in Understanding Phytoplankton Fluorescence and Photosynthesis , 1992 .

[43]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Natural variability in photosynthetic energy conversion efficiency: A field study in the Gulf of Maine , 1990 .

[44]  E. Laws,et al.  Modeling Phytoplankton Carbon Metabolism , 1980 .

[45]  B. Prézelin,et al.  CHROMATIC REGULATION OF QUANTUM YIELDS FOR PHOTOSYSTEM II CHARGE SEPARATION, OXYGEN EVOLUTION, AND CARBON FIXATION IN HETEROCAPSA PYGMAEA (PYRROPHYTA) 1 , 1993 .

[46]  I. Davison ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON ALGAL PHOTOSYNTHESIS: TEMPERATURE , 1991 .

[47]  H. Trissl,et al.  Theory of fluorescence induction in photosystem II: derivation of analytical expressions in a model including exciton-radical-pair equilibrium and restricted energy transfer between photosynthetic units. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Warren L. Butler,et al.  Energy Distribution in the Photochemical Apparatus of Photosynthesis , 1978 .

[49]  Paul G. Falkowski,et al.  Relationship of steady-state photosynthesis to fluorescence in eucaryotic algae , 1986 .

[50]  W. L. Butler,et al.  Fluorescence quenching in photosystem II of chloroplasts. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[51]  John J. Cullen,et al.  Bio‐optical inferences from chlorophyll a fluorescence: What kind of fluorescence is measured in flow cytometry? , 1989 .

[52]  P. Falkowski Primary productivity in the sea , 1980 .

[53]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Use of active fluorescence to estimate phytoplankton photosynthesis in situ , 1993 .

[54]  Zbigniew S. Kolber,et al.  Variations in Chlorophyll Fluorescence Yields in Phytoplankton in the World Oceans , 1995 .