Monitoring the degree of implementation of an integrated delivery system

Abstract Introduction The aim of the study was to develop a method to measure the implementation of specific components of an Integrated Service Delivery system for the frail elderly. The system includes six mechanisms and tools: (1) coordination of all organizations involved in delivering health and social services, (2) a single entry point, (3) case management, (4) a single assessment tool with a case-mix classification system, (5) an individualized service plan, and (6) a computerized clinical chart. Method Focus groups of researchers, clinicians, managers and policy-makers identified quantitative indicators for each component. The six components were weighted according to their relative importance in order to generate a total score. Data were collected every six months over 30 months to establish the implementation degree in the three experimental areas: Sherbrooke, Granit and Coaticook in the Province of Quebec, Canada. Results After 30 months, coordination is the most developed component in the three experimental areas. Overall, in July 2003, the Integrated Service Delivery system was implemented at the rate of 73%, 71% and 70% in Sherbrooke, Granit and Coaticook, respectively. Discussion This type of quantitative assessment provides data for managers and researchers to monitor the implementation. Moreover, when there is an outcome study, the results of the outcome study can be correlated with the degree of implementation, thus allowing for dose-response analyzes and helping to decrease the “black box” effect.

[1]  C. Eng,et al.  Program of All‐inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): An Innovative Model of Integrated Geriatric Care and Financing , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[2]  W N Leutz,et al.  Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. , 1999, The Milbank quarterly.

[3]  J. Waldman,et al.  A consolidated model of long-term care: service utilization and cost impacts. , 1985, The Gerontologist.

[4]  Mira Johri,et al.  International experiments in integrated care for the elderly: a synthesis of the evidence , 2003, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[5]  A. Tourigny,et al.  PRISMA: a new model of integrated service delivery for the frail older people in Canada , 2003, International journal of integrated care.

[6]  C. Kyriacou,et al.  Fully integrated care for frail elderly: two American models , 2000, International journal of integrated care.

[7]  Réjean Hébert,et al.  THE FUNCTIONAL AUTONOMY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM (SMAF): A CLINICAL-BASED INSTRUMENT FOR MEASUR- ING DISABILITIES AND HANDICAPS IN OLDER PEOPLE , 2001 .

[8]  L. Branch,et al.  The PACE evaluation: initial findings. , 1995, The Gerontologist.

[9]  A. Tourigny,et al.  Frail elderly patients. New model for integrated service delivery. , 2003, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[10]  M. Tousignant,et al.  Application of a case-mix classification based on the functional autonomy of the residents for funding long-term care facilities. , 2003, Age and ageing.

[11]  L. Rubenstein,et al.  Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community , 1998, BMJ.

[12]  W. Leutz Changing Health Care for an Aging Society: Planning for the Social Health Maintenance Organization , 1985 .