Tracking Multiple Objects Is Limited Only by Object Spacing, Not by Speed, Time, or Capacity

In dealing with a dynamic world, people have the ability to maintain selective attention on a subset of moving objects in the environment. Performance in such multiple-object tracking is limited by three primary factors—the number of objects that one can track, the speed at which one can track them, and how close together they can be. We argue that this last limit, of object spacing, is the root cause of all performance constraints in multiple-object tracking. In two experiments, we found that as long as the distribution of object spacing is held constant, tracking performance is unaffected by large changes in object speed and tracking time. These results suggest that barring object-spacing constraints, people could reliably track an unlimited number of objects as fast as they could track a single object.

[1]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[3]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[4]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[5]  S. Yantis.  Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Modeling Visual Attention via Selective Tuning , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[7]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Attentional interference at small spatial separations , 1999, Vision Research.

[10]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Situating vision in the world , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item , 2003, Vision Research.

[13]  C. S. Green,et al.  Action video game modifies visual selective attention , 2003, Nature.

[14]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher‐order cognition? An individual difference approach , 2004 .

[15]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities , 2004 .

[16]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  How many locations can you select at once , 2005 .

[17]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[18]  James T Enns,et al.  Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  G. Alvarez,et al.  How many locations can be selected at once? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[23]  C S Green,et al.  Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision , 2007, Psychological science.

[24]  Brian D. Fisher,et al.  Evidence against a speed limit in multiple-object tracking , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Adriane E. Seiffert,et al.  Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Bilateral field advantage in visual crowding , 2009, Vision Research.

[28]  Sheng He,et al.  Reduction of the Crowding Effect in Spatially Adjacent but Cortically Remote Visual Stimuli , 2009, Current Biology.

[29]  M. Grabowecky,et al.  Demand-based dynamic distribution of attention and monitoring of velocities during multiple-object tracking. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[30]  Todd S Horowitz,et al.  Distinguishing between parallel and serial accounts of multiple object tracking. , 2010, Journal of vision.