Social Simulation in the Social Sciences

This article provides an overview of the social simulation approach to the study of social phenomena. We focus especially on the relevance of heterogeneity of social behavior and dynamics and the complex interplay of agent behavior and social structure. The article identifies the peculiarities and the explanatory achievements of this approach and then discusses its prospects and challenges. Special attention is given to (i) how micro-level behavioral detail can be used to understand social patterns and dynamics; (ii) the importance of the meso level of social networks; and (iii) the two-way, process linkages between micro and macro aspects as a fundamental source of social uncertainty and unpredictability.

[1]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The wisdom of crowds , 2016, The Lancet.

[2]  Emilian Kavalski,et al.  Complexity, Institutions and Public Policy: Agile Decision-Making in a Turbulent World , 2013 .

[3]  Sean J. Taylor,et al.  Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment , 2013, Science.

[4]  K. Laland,et al.  Social Learning: An Introduction to Mechanisms, Methods, and Models , 2013 .

[5]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Modelling Norms , 2013 .

[6]  Wander Jager,et al.  Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: DIAL, A Dialogical Model for Opinion Dynamics , 2013, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[7]  Olivier Toubia,et al.  Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter? , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[8]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Simulating Social Complexity: A Handbook , 2013 .

[9]  Rik Crutzen,et al.  An Agent-Based Social Network Model of Binge Drinking Among Dutch Adults , 2013, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[10]  M. Haenlein Social interactions in customer churn decisions: The impact of relationship directionality☆ , 2013 .

[11]  E. Shafir The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy , 2013 .

[12]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Origins of human cooperation and morality. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  P. V. Eck The invisible force that shapes our world : insights into complex, dynamic social influence processes, a marketing perpespective , 2013 .

[14]  Károly Takács Positive Linking: How Networks Can Revolutionise the World by Paul Ormerod , 2013, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[15]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Agent-Based Social Simulation and Its Necessity for Understanding Socially Embedded Phenomena , 2013, Minding Norms.

[16]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Social Relationships and the Emergence of Social Networks , 2012, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[17]  Johannes Zschache,et al.  Producing public goods in networks: Some effects of social comparison and endogenous network change , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[18]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[19]  Paul Cairney,et al.  Complexity Theory in Political Science and Public Policy , 2012 .

[20]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks , 2012, Science.

[21]  Philip Ball,et al.  Why Society is a Complex Matter: Meeting Twenty-first Century Challenges with a New Kind of Science , 2012 .

[22]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  Agent-Based Computational Sociology , 2012 .

[23]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Computational Modelling of Trust and Social Relationships , 2012, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[24]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  Trust and Partner Selection in Social Networks: An Experimentally Grounded Model , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[25]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Social Self-Organization , 2012 .

[26]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Social self-organization : agent-based simulations and experiments to study emergent social behavior , 2012 .

[27]  Hans Risselada Analyzing behavior in customer relationships accounting for customer-to-customer interactions , 2012 .

[28]  P. Ball Why Society is a Complex Matter , 2012 .

[29]  B. Libai,et al.  Social Effects on Customer Retention , 2011 .

[30]  Katrin Fehl,et al.  Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[31]  D. Helbing,et al.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  The wisdom of crowds in one mind: How individuals can simulate the knowledge of diverse societies to reach better decisions , 2011 .

[33]  P. Leeflang,et al.  Opinion Leaders' Role in Innovation Diffusion: A Simulation Study , 2011 .

[34]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social network determinants of depression , 2011, Molecular Psychiatry.

[35]  Paul M. Parizel,et al.  Comparing the Neural Basis of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas of People With Different Social Value Orientations, a fMRI Study , 2011 .

[36]  James H Fowler,et al.  Correlated genotypes in friendship networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  D. Watts,et al.  Threshold Models of Social Influence , 2011 .

[38]  Graham Room,et al.  Complexity, Institutions and Public Policy , 2011 .

[39]  Thomas Fent Complexity and Public Policy: A New Approach to 21st Century Politics, Policy & Society by Robert Geyer and Samir Rihani , 2011, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[40]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social network determinants of depression , 2010, Molecular Psychiatry.

[41]  Jenny Muir,et al.  Public Management and Complexity Theory: Richer Decision-Making in Public Services , 2010 .

[42]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  Why Bother with What Others Tell You? An Experimental Data-Driven Agent-Based Model , 2010, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[43]  Edoardo Mollona,et al.  Computational Analysis of Firms' Organization and Strategic Behaviour , 2010 .

[44]  Robert Geyer,et al.  Complexity and Public Policy: A New Approach to 21st Century Politics, Policy And Society , 2010 .

[45]  R. Boyd,et al.  Coordinated Punishment of Defectors Sustains Cooperation and Can Proliferate When Rare , 2010, Science.

[46]  Petra Ahrweiler,et al.  Innovation in complex social systems , 2010 .

[47]  A. Hama Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions , 2010 .

[48]  J. Tyran Gintis, H.: The Bounds of Reason. Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences , 2010 .

[49]  Rense Corten,et al.  Co-evolution of conventions and networks: An experimental study , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[50]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  Complexity-Friendly Policy Modelling , 2010 .

[51]  Bruce Edmonds Computational modelling and social theory – the dangers of numerical representation , 2010 .

[52]  F. Squazzoni The Impact of Agent-Based Models in the Social Sciences after 15 Years of Incursions , 2010 .

[53]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network medicine : a network-based approach to human disease , 2010 .

[54]  H. Gintis The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences , 2014 .

[55]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  Pillars of Trust: An Experimental Study on Reputation and Its Effects , 2009 .

[56]  D. Watts,et al.  Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[57]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Towards the evolution of social structure , 2009, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[58]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  Epistemological Aspects of Computer Simulation in the Social Sciences, Second International Workshop, EPOS 2006, Brescia, Italy, October 5-6, 2006, Revised Selected and Invited Papers , 2009, EPOS.

[59]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process , 2009 .

[60]  M. Macy,et al.  Agent based modelling: social order from the bottom up , 2009 .

[61]  T. Raffaelli Old and New Perspectives on the Co-Evolution of Technology and Business Organization , 2009 .

[62]  P. Bearman,et al.  The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology , 2009 .

[63]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[64]  R. Adolphs,et al.  The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[65]  M. Batty Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling , 2008 .

[66]  G. Deffuant,et al.  A Rejection Mechanism in 2D Bounded Confidence Provides More Conformity , 2008, Adv. Complex Syst..

[67]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social Networks and Health , 2008 .

[68]  P. Ormerod,et al.  ‘Binge’ drinking in the UK: a social network phenomenon , 2008, 0806.3176.

[69]  S. Quartz,et al.  The Right and the Good: Distributive Justice and Neural Encoding of Equity and Efficiency , 2008, Science.

[70]  Jesse M. Bering,et al.  Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game , 2008 .

[71]  Jordi Sabater-Mir,et al.  Reputation for Innovating Social Networks , 2008, Adv. Complex Syst..

[72]  John H. Miller,et al.  Complex adaptive systems - an introduction to computational models of social life , 2009, Princeton studies in complexity.

[73]  Dirk Semmann,et al.  Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[74]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[75]  John H. Miller,et al.  Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life (Princeton Studies in Complexity) , 2007 .

[76]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling (Princeton Studies in Complexity) , 2007 .

[77]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  The Epistemologies of Social Simulation Research , 2009, EPOS.

[78]  Joseph M. Whitmeyer,et al.  Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems , 2006 .

[79]  Francisco C. Santos,et al.  Cooperation Prevails When Individuals Adjust Their Social Ties , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[80]  Andrew M. Colman,et al.  Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life , 2006 .

[81]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[82]  Marco Janssen,et al.  Evolution of Cooperation when Feedback to Reputation Scores is Voluntary , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[83]  Christian Lebiere,et al.  Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation , 2006 .

[84]  P. Hedström Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology , 2005 .

[85]  R. Sun Cognition and Multi-Agent Interactions: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation , 2005 .

[86]  B. Edmonds,et al.  Computational Simulation as Theoretical Experiment , 2005 .

[87]  R. Sawyer Social Emergence: Societies As Complex Systems , 2005 .

[88]  Wander Jager,et al.  Uniformity, Bipolarization and Pluriformity Captured as Generic Stylized Behavior with an Agent-Based Simulation Model of Attitude Change , 2005, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[89]  H. Gintis,et al.  The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations , 2004 .

[90]  H. Gintis,et al.  The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[91]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  The Structure of Founding Teams: Homophily, Strong Ties, and Isolation among U.S. Entrepreneurs , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[92]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[93]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[94]  David Hales,et al.  Group Reputation Supports Beneficent Norms , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[95]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[96]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[97]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[98]  S. Galam Minority opinion spreading in random geometry , 2002, cond-mat/0203553.

[99]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .

[100]  Mario Paolucci,et al.  Reputation in Artificial Societies , 2002, Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations.

[101]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Agent Based Simulation in Integrated Assessment and Resources Management , 2002 .

[102]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Sociology and Social Theory in Agent Based Social Simulation: A Symposium , 2001, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[103]  T. Bergstrom Evolution of Social Behavior: Individual and Group Selection Models , 2001 .

[104]  E. Ostrom Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[105]  L. Amaral,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[107]  R. Axelrod Reviews book & software , 2022 .

[108]  Andrew M. Colman,et al.  The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration , 1998, Complex..

[109]  Steven N. Durlauf,et al.  What Should Policymakers Know About Economic Complexity , 1997 .

[110]  R. Hegselmann,et al.  Simulating Social Phenomena , 1997 .

[111]  Klaus G. Troitzsch,et al.  Social Science Simulation — Origins, Prospects, Purposes , 1997 .

[112]  Harald Reuter,et al.  Diversity and complexity , 1988, Nature.

[113]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[114]  G. Simmel The Philosophy of Money , 1979 .

[115]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[116]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior , 1975 .

[117]  Mark S. Granovetter Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[118]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[119]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .