Identification of Four Novel PCDH19 Mutations and Prediction of Their Functional Impact

The PCDH19 gene encodes protocadherin‐19, a transmembrane protein with six cadherin (EC) domains, containing adhesive interfaces likely to be involved in neuronal connection. Over a hundred mostly private mutations have been identified in girls with epilepsy, with or without intellectual disability (ID). Furthermore, transmitting hemizygous males are devoid of seizures or ID, making it difficult to establish the pathogenic nature of newly identified variants. Here, we describe an integrated approach to evaluate the pathogenicity of four novel PCDH19 mutations. Segregation analysis has been complemented with an in silico analysis of mutation effects at the protein level. Using sequence information, we compared different computational prediction methods. We used homology modeling to build structural models of two PCDH19 EC‐domains, and compared wild‐type and mutant models to identify differences in residue interactions or biochemical properties of the model surfaces. Our analysis suggests different molecular effects of the novel mutations in exerting their pathogenic role. Two of them interfere with or alter functional residues predicted to mediate ligand or protein binding, one alters the EC‐domain folding stability; the frame‐shift mutation produces a truncated protein lacking the intracellular domain. Interestingly, the girl carrying the putative loss of function mutation presents the most severe phenotype.

[1]  Silvio C. E. Tosatto,et al.  Bluues server: electrostatic properties of wild-type and mutated protein structures , 2012, Bioinform..

[2]  P S Kim,et al.  Measurement of the beta-sheet-forming propensities of amino acids. , 1994, Nature.

[3]  Nancy B. Spinner,et al.  Epilepsy and mental retardation limited to females: an X-linked dominant disorder with male sparing , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Eckart Bindewald,et al.  A divide and conquer approach to fast loop modeling. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[5]  T. Yagi,et al.  Structure of the Cadherin-related Neuronal Receptor/Protocadherin-α First Extracellular Cadherin Domain Reveals Diversity across Cadherin Families* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  J. Jontes,et al.  A complex of Protocadherin-19 and N-cadherin mediates a novel mechanism of cell adhesion , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  P. S. Kim,et al.  Measurement of the β-sheet-forming propensities of amino acids , 1994, Nature.

[8]  M. Lalande,et al.  Identification and characterization of three members of a novel subclass of protocadherins. , 2001, Genomics.

[9]  Michael R Stratton,et al.  Epilepsy and mental retardation limited to females with PCDH19 mutations can present de novo or in single generation families , 2009, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[10]  E. Bertini,et al.  Spectrum of phenotypes in female patients with epilepsy due to protocadherin 19 mutations , 2011, Epilepsia.

[11]  C. Redies,et al.  δ-Protocadherins: unique structures and functions , 2005, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[12]  Jeroen F. J. Laros,et al.  LOVD v.2.0: the next generation in gene variant databases , 2011, Human mutation.

[13]  Fabiana Bahna,et al.  Molecular design principles underlying β-strand swapping in the adhesive dimerization of cadherins , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[14]  Tal Pupko,et al.  ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  W. Arts,et al.  Clinical and genetic aspects of PCDH19-related epilepsy syndromes and the possible role of PCDH19 mutations in males with autism spectrum disorders , 2013, neurogenetics.

[16]  P. Stenson,et al.  The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update , 2009, Genome Medicine.

[17]  R. C. Juberg,et al.  A new familial form of convulsive disorder and mental retardation limited to females. , 1971, The Journal of pediatrics.

[18]  Emidio Capriotti,et al.  Bioinformatics Original Paper Predicting the Insurgence of Human Genetic Diseases Associated to Single Point Protein Mutations with Support Vector Machines and Evolutionary Information , 2022 .

[19]  T. Boggon,et al.  C-Cadherin Ectodomain Structure and Implications for Cell Adhesion Mechanisms , 2002, Science.

[20]  Adrian A Canutescu,et al.  Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1110/ps.03154503 References , 2003 .

[21]  I. Scheffer,et al.  Recurrence risk of epilepsy and mental retardation in females due to parental mosaicism of PCDH19 mutations , 2011, Neurology.

[22]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Woong Sun,et al.  Spatiotemporal expression pattern of non-clustered protocadherin family members in the developing rat brain , 2007, Neuroscience.

[24]  Seema M Jamal,et al.  Novel de novo PCDH19 mutations in three unrelated females with epilepsy female restricted mental retardation syndrome , 2010, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[25]  Fabiana Bahna,et al.  Type II Cadherin Ectodomain Structures: Implications for Classical Cadherin Specificity , 2006, Cell.

[26]  M. Ruberg,et al.  Sporadic Infantile Epileptic Encephalopathy Caused by Mutations in PCDH19 Resembles Dravet Syndrome but Mainly Affects Females , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[27]  T. Yagi,et al.  Protocadherin Family: Diversity, Structure, and Function This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cell to Cell Contact and Extracellular Matrix Edited Diversity and Classification Protein Structure and Adhesive Property , 2022 .

[28]  M. Ikura,et al.  Structural basis of calcium-induced E-cadherin rigidification and dimerization , 1996, Nature.

[29]  R. Guerrini,et al.  Protocadherin 19 mutations in girls with infantile-onset epilepsy , 2010, Neurology.

[30]  F. Rivier,et al.  Mutations and Deletions in PCDH19 Account for Various Familial or Isolated Epilepsies in Females , 2011, Human mutation.

[31]  S. Sartori,et al.  Early‐onset epileptic encephalopathy in a girl carrying a truncating mutation of the ARX gene: rethinking the ARX phenotype in females , 2013, Clinical genetics.

[32]  M. Vihinen,et al.  Pathogenic or not? And if so, then how? Studying the effects of missense mutations using bioinformatics methods , 2009, Human mutation.

[33]  W. Grody,et al.  ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: Revisions 2007 , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[34]  Andrew Menzies,et al.  X-linked protocadherin 19 mutations cause female-limited epilepsy and cognitive impairment , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[35]  O. Pertz,et al.  A new crystal structure, Ca2+ dependence and mutational analysis reveal molecular details of E‐cadherin homoassociation , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[36]  Steven Henikoff,et al.  SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[37]  C. Redies,et al.  delta-Protocadherins: unique structures and functions. , 2005, Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS.

[38]  D. Leckband,et al.  Calcium site mutations in cadherin: impact on adhesion and evidence of cooperativity. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[39]  Christel Depienne,et al.  PCDH19‐related infantile epileptic encephalopathy: An unusual X‐linked inheritance disorder , 2012, Human mutation.

[40]  Kazutaka Katoh,et al.  Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[41]  I. Adzhubei,et al.  Predicting Functional Effect of Human Missense Mutations Using PolyPhen‐2 , 2013, Current protocols in human genetics.

[42]  S. Tosatto,et al.  A Computational Model of the LGI1 Protein Suggests a Common Binding Site for ADAM Proteins , 2011, PloS one.

[43]  C. Kay,et al.  Multiple cadherin extracellular repeats mediate homophilic binding and adhesion , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[45]  Masaki Kubota,et al.  Adhesion properties and retinofugal expression of chicken protocadherin-19 , 2010, Brain Research.