How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice

This article documents how biomedical researchers in the United Kingdom understand and enact the idea of “openness.” This is of particular interest to researchers and science policy worldwide in view of the recent adoption of pioneering policies on Open Science and Open Access by the U.K. government—policies whose impact on and implications for research practice are in need of urgent evaluation, so as to decide on their eventual implementation elsewhere. This study is based on 22 in-depth interviews with U.K. researchers in systems biology, synthetic biology, and bioinformatics, which were conducted between September 2013 and February 2014. Through an analysis of the interview transcripts, we identify seven core themes that characterize researchers’ understanding of openness in science and nine factors that shape the practice of openness in research. Our findings highlight the implications that Open Science policies can have for research processes and outcomes and provide recommendations for enhancing their content, effectiveness, and implementation.

[1]  Elizabeth D. Dalton,et al.  Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide , 2015, PloS one.

[2]  John Willinsky,et al.  The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science , 2005, First Monday.

[3]  Steve M. Easterbrook,et al.  On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  Stephen Pinfield,et al.  Coherence of "Open" Initiatives in Higher Education and Research: Framing a Policy Agenda , 2014 .

[5]  B. Björk,et al.  Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 , 2010, PloS one.

[6]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Beyond the digital divide: Towards a situated approach to open data , 2017 .

[7]  Nathaniel Tkacz,et al.  From open source to open government : a critique of open politics , 2012 .

[8]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Troubleshooting Public Data Archiving: Suggestions to Increase Participation , 2013, PLoS biology.

[9]  Ross J. Anderson,et al.  The collection, linking and use of data in biomedical research and health care: ethical issues , 2015 .

[10]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Valuing data in postgenomic biology : how data donation and curation practices challenge the scientific publication system , 2015 .

[11]  Grace Lang RCUK Policy on Open Access , 2015 .

[12]  Victoria Tsoukala,et al.  RECODE Policy Recommendations for Open Access to Research Data , 2015 .

[13]  Bryn Nelson Data sharing: Empty archives , 2009, Nature.

[14]  Karen Bultitude,et al.  Mapping the hinterland: Data issues in open science , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[15]  Tony Hey,et al.  The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery , 2009 .

[16]  Odette Parry,et al.  Open Access Digital Data Sharing: Principles, Policies and Practices☆ , 2013 .

[17]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data Access, Ownership, and Control , 1994 .

[18]  D. Carr Wellcome Trust Policy on Data Management and Sharing , 2011 .

[19]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology , 2013 .

[20]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study , 2016 .

[21]  Diane Harley,et al.  Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0 , 2013, New Media Soc..

[22]  Marcia McNutt,et al.  Data sharing , 2016, Science.

[23]  Daniel Spichtinger,et al.  'Science 2.0': Science in Transition , 2014 .

[24]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Data, data use, and scientific inquiry: two case studies of data practices , 2012, JCDL '12.

[25]  James A. Evans Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge , 2010 .

[26]  Sandra D. Mitchell Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. , 2013 .

[27]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The conundrum of sharing research data , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  The Impact Factor Game , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[29]  Christopher Kelty,et al.  Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software , 2008 .

[30]  Christine L Borgman,et al.  Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration , 2011, Social studies of science.

[31]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[32]  C. Haeussler Information-Sharing in Academia and the Industry: A Comparative Study , 2010 .

[33]  Wim van der Stelt,et al.  Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications.: Executive summary , 2014 .

[34]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Local context, academic entrepreneurship and open science: Publication secrecy and commercial activity among Japanese and US scientists , 2014 .

[35]  B. Björk,et al.  The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 , 2011, PloS one.

[36]  Serge Fdida,et al.  LERU Roadmap for Research Data , 2013 .

[37]  C. Neylon Science publishing: Open access must enable open use , 2012, Nature.

[38]  Fiona Godlee,et al.  Open science and reproducible research , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Who is responsible for data? An exploratory study of data authorship, ownership, and responsibility , 2011, ASIST.

[40]  Anne E. Trefethen,et al.  Toward interoperable bioscience data , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[41]  M. Peters Open Science, Philosophy and Peer Review , 2014, The Methodology and Philosophy of Collective Writing.

[42]  C. Borgman,et al.  If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology , 2013, PloS one.

[43]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Altmetrics: Value all research products , 2013, Nature.

[44]  Philippe Desjardins-Proulx,et al.  The Case for Open Preprints in Biology , 2013, PLoS biology.

[45]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[46]  P. Gaulé,et al.  Getting Cited: Does Open Access Help? , 2008 .