Evaluation of Home-Based Rehabilitation Sensing Systems with Respect to Standardised Clinical Tests

With increased demand for tele-rehabilitation, many autonomous home-based rehabilitation systems have appeared recently. Many of these systems, however, suffer from lack of patient acceptance and engagement or fail to provide satisfactory accuracy; both are needed for appropriate diagnostics. This paper first provides a detailed discussion of current sensor-based home-based rehabilitation systems with respect to four recently established criteria for wide acceptance and long engagement. A methodological procedure is then proposed for the evaluation of accuracy of portable sensing home-based rehabilitation systems, in line with medically-approved tests and recommendations. For experiments, we deploy an in-house low-cost sensing system meeting the four criteria of acceptance to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed evaluation methodology. We observe that the deployed sensor system has limitations in sensing fast movement. Indicators of enhanced motivation and engagement are recorded through the questionnaire responses with more than 83% of the respondents supporting the system’s motivation and engagement enhancement. The evaluation results demonstrate that the deployed system is fit for purpose with statistically significant (ϱc>0.99, R2>0.94, ICC>0.96) and unbiased correlation to the golden standard.

[1]  Kitsunezaki Naofumi,et al.  KINECT applications for the physical rehabilitation , 2012 .

[2]  GyuChang Lee,et al.  Validity of the performance-oriented mobility assessment in predicting fall of stroke survivors: a retrospective cohort study. , 2014, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  Misha Pavel,et al.  Unobtrusive monitoring of the longitudinal evolution of in-home gait velocity data with applications to elder care , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  Classification of frailty and falls history using a combination of sensor-based mobility assessments , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[5]  S. Ng,et al.  5-repetition sit-to-stand test in subjects with chronic stroke: reliability and validity. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Ellen Neubauer Picone The Timed Up and Go Test , 2013, The American journal of nursing.

[7]  Thomas Frenken,et al.  aTUG: Fully-automated timed up and go assessment using ambient sensor technologies , 2011, 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops.

[8]  Frank Knoefel,et al.  Context-aware smart home monitoring through pressure measurement sequences , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Medical Measurements and Applications.

[9]  Andreas Hein,et al.  Skeleton Timed Up and Go , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine.

[10]  F. Horak,et al.  Responsiveness of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in People With Subacute Stroke , 2016, Physical Therapy.

[11]  C. Becker,et al.  Smartphone-based solutions for fall detection and prevention: the FARSEEING approach , 2012, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie.

[12]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  L. Critchley,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques , 1999, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[14]  Aleksandar Milenkovic,et al.  Quantifying Timed-Up-and-Go test: A smartphone implementation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Body Sensor Networks.

[15]  W.K. Durfee,et al.  Technical Feasibility of Teleassessments for Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  Klaus Hauer,et al.  Coordination of strength exertion during the chair-rise movement in very old people. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[17]  Toshiharu Nakai,et al.  Use of the sit-to-stand task to evaluate motor function of older adults using telemetry , 2016, BMC Geriatrics.

[18]  G. Iverson,et al.  Normative Data for the Balance Error Scoring System in Adults , 2013, Rehabilitation research and practice.

[19]  B. Carstensen,et al.  Statistical Models for Assessing Agreement in Method Comparison Studies with Replicate Measurements , 2008, The international journal of biostatistics.

[20]  Misha Pavel,et al.  Unobtrusive and Ubiquitous In-Home Monitoring: A Methodology for Continuous Assessment of Gait Velocity in Elders , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Jaap H. van Dieën,et al.  The Instrumented Sit-to-Stand Test (iSTS) Has Greater Clinical Relevance than the Manually Recorded Sit-to-Stand Test in Older Adults , 2016, PloS one.

[22]  Nora Millor,et al.  An evaluation of the 30-s chair stand test in older adults: frailty detection based on kinematic parameters from a single inertial unit , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  A. Kalra Decoding the Bland–Altman plot: Basic review , 2017 .

[24]  Gina Sprint,et al.  Toward Automating Clinical Assessments: A Survey of the Timed Up and Go , 2015, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Andreas Hein,et al.  Towards an Automated Unsupervised Mobility Assessment for Older People Based on Inertial TUG Measurements , 2018, Sensors.

[26]  Barry R. Greene,et al.  Quantitative Falls Risk Assessment Using the Timed Up and Go Test , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Wiebren Zijlstra,et al.  Sensitivity of sensor-based sit-to-stand peak power to the effects of training leg strength, leg power and balance in older adults. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[28]  Luca Palmerini,et al.  Dimensionality reduction for the quantitative evaluation of a smartphone-based Timed Up and Go test , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  Vernon M. Chinchilli,et al.  Estimation of the concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measures using SAS and R , 2013, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[30]  Lisa C. Blum,et al.  Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[31]  Timed Up & Go as a measure for longitudinal change in mobility after stroke – Postural Stroke Study in Gothenburg (POSTGOT) , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  T. Templin,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand and Timed-Up-and-Go Tests as Measures of Functional Mobility in Persons with and without Injection-Related Venous Ulcers , 2014, Advances in skin & wound care.

[33]  Andreas Hein,et al.  Measurement of the Chair Rise Performance of Older People Based on Force Plates and IMUs , 2019, Sensors.

[34]  V. Stanković,et al.  Factors That Contribute to the Use of Stroke Self-Rehabilitation Technologies: A Review , 2019, JMIR Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Longitudinal Falls-Risk Estimation Using Triaxial Accelerometry , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Automatic administration of the get up and go test , 2007, HealthNet '07.

[37]  Jesús Fontecha,et al.  Elderly frailty detection by using accelerometer-enabled smartphones and clinical information records , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[38]  E. Park,et al.  The sensitivity and specificity of the Falls Efficacy Scale and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale for hemiplegic stroke patients , 2018, Journal of physical therapy science.

[39]  Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel On Falls Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons , 2001 .

[40]  Lorenzo Chiari,et al.  Smartphone-based applications for investigating falls and mobility , 2011, 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops.

[41]  M. Mancini,et al.  Sit-stand and stand-sit transitions in older adults and patients with Parkinson’s disease: event detection based on motion sensors versus force plates , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[42]  D Maquet,et al.  The value of instrumental gait analysis in elderly healthy, MCI or Alzheimer's disease subjects and a comparison with other clinical tests used in single and dual-task conditions. , 2009, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[43]  R. Cheung,et al.  A validation study of a smartphone application for functional mobility assessment of the elderly , 2016, Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao.

[44]  James M. Keller,et al.  Quantitative analysis of 180 degree turns for fall risk assessment using video sensors , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[45]  Amandine Dubois,et al.  Automating the Timed Up and Go Test Using a Depth Camera , 2018, Sensors.

[46]  M. Sekine,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of movement using the timed up-and-go test , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[47]  Barry R. Greene,et al.  Objective real-time assessment of walking and turning in elderly adults , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[48]  S. Lord,et al.  Kinect-Based Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test for Clinical and In-Home Assessment of Fall Risk in Older People , 2015, Gerontology.

[49]  A. Duarte,et al.  The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge , 2019, Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva.

[50]  Weria Khaksar,et al.  Ambient Sensors for Elderly Care and Independent Living: A Survey , 2018, Sensors.

[51]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  A Survey on Ambient Intelligence in Healthcare , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[52]  F. Horak,et al.  iTUG, a Sensitive and Reliable Measure of Mobility , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[53]  Antonio Cuesta-Vargas,et al.  Mobile Functional Reach Test in People Who Suffer Stroke: A Pilot Study , 2014, JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies.

[54]  E. Rothenberg,et al.  Height and body weight in elderly adults: a 21-year population study on secular trends and related factors in 70-year-olds. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[55]  D. K. Singh,et al.  ‘Timed Up and Go’ test: Age, gender and cognitive impairment stratified normative values of older adults , 2017, PloS one.

[56]  J. Shaoul Human Error , 1973, Nature.