Dilemmas in Framing Research Studies in Engineering Education

There has been considerable debate about the need for more empirical, evidence based studies of the impact of various interventions and practices in engineering education. A number of resources including workshops to guide engineering faculty in the conduct of such studies have emerged over recent years. This paper presents a critique of the evolution of engineering education research and its underlying assumptions in the context of the systemic reform currently underway in engineering education. This critique leads to an analysis of the ways in which our current understanding of engineering, engineering education and research in engineering education is shaped by the traditions and cultural characteristics of the profession and grounded, albeit implicitly, in a particular suite of epistemological assumptions. It is argued that the whole enterprise of engineering education needs to be radically reconceptualized. A pluralistic approach to framing scholarship in engineering education is then proposed based on the principles of demonstrable practicality, critical interdisciplinarity and holistic reflexivity. This new framework has implications for engaging and developing faculty in the context of new teaching and learning paradigms, for the evaluation of the scholarship of teaching and for the research-teaching nexus.

[1]  P. Wankat.  An Analysis of the Articles in the Journal of Engineering Education , 1999 .

[2]  Ronald L. Miller.  Reflections on Outcomes Assessment and the ABET Accreditation Process , 2002 .

[3]  E. Boyer.  Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[4]  Anne K. Ditcher,et al.  Effective teaching and learning in higher education, with particular reference to the undergraduate education of professional engineers , 2001 .

[5]  Susan English,et al.  Why innovate? Some preliminary findings from a research project on ‘innovations in teaching and learning in higher education˚s , 1999 .

[6]  James Stice.  Thirty Years Of Educational Innovations , 1998 .

[7]  Edward Ernst,et al.  A comprehensive system for student and program assessment: lessons learned , 2001 .

[8]  Fowler Vincent Harper,et al.  The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching , 1910, Nature.

[9]  Peter G. Taylor.  Institutional change in uncertain times: Lone ranging is not enough , 1998 .

[10]  Eugene S. Ferguson,et al.  Engineering and the Mind's Eye , 1994 .

[11]  Nira Hativa,et al.  Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning : implications for practice , 1995 .

[12]  Tony Becher,et al.  Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis , 2002 .

[13]  N. Fortenberry.  An Educational Research Agenda For Smet Higher Education , 1999 .

[14]  M. Healey.  Developing the Scholarship of Teaching in Higher Education: A discipline-based approach , 2000 .

[15]  Frank S. Oreovicz,et al.  THE SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND LEARNING IN ENGINEERING , 2002 .

[16]  Denny Davis,et al.  Designing Sound Scoring Criteria for Assessing Student Performance , 1999 .

[17]  Carolin Kreber,et al.  Controversy and Consensus on the Scholarship of Teaching , 2002 .

[18]  L. Andresen.  A Useable, Trans-Disciplinary Conception of Scholarship , 2000 .

[19]  G. Kendall.  The Crisis in Doctoral Education: A sociological diagnosis , 2002 .

[20]  Lewis Elton,et al.  Teaching in Higher Education: Appraisal and Training , 1987 .

[21]  Barbara M. Olds,et al.  Preparing for ABET EC 2000: Research-Based Assessment Methods and Processes* , 2002 .

[22]  Lesley Jolly,et al.  Strategies For Developing Reflexive Habits In Students , 2000 .

[23]  A. Cribb,et al.  Towards the Reflexive Medical School: The Hidden Curriculum and Medical Education Research. , 1999 .

[24]  Stephen Rowland.  The role of theory in a pedagogical model for lecturers in higher education , 1999 .

[25]  R. Neumann.  Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching , 2001 .

[26]  Brian Chalkley,et al.  The Scholarship of Teaching , 2003 .

[27]  P. Olmesdahl.  Preoccupation with Quality , 1999 .

[28]  Alan Bleakley,et al.  From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity , 1999 .

[29]  David Bell,et al.  Re‐Use or Re‐Invent? Understanding and Supporting Learning from Experience of Peers in a Product Development Community * , 2001 .