Preoperative Ultrasound Assessment of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma Patients Does not Provide Reliable Nodal Staging

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Objective: To assess whether preoperative ultrasound (US) assessment of regional lymph nodes in patients who present with primary cutaneous melanoma provides accurate staging. Background: It has been suggested that preoperative US could avoid the need for sentinel node (SN) biopsy, but in most single-institution reports, the sensitivity of preoperative US has been low. Methods: Preoperative US data and SNB results were analyzed for patients enrolled at 20 centers participating in the screening phase of the second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial. Excised SNs were histopathologically assessed and considered positive if any melanoma was seen. Results: SNs were identified and removed from 2859 patients who had preoperative US evaluation. Among those patients, 548 had SN metastases. US was positive (abnormal) in 87 patients (3.0%). Among SN-positive patients, 39 (7.1%) had an abnormal US. When analyzed by lymph node basin, 3302 basins were evaluated, and 38 were true positive (1.2%). By basin, the sensitivity of US was 6.6% (95% confidence interval: 4.6–8.7) and the specificity 98.0% (95% CI: 97.5–98.5). Median cross-sectional area of all SN metastases was 0.13 mm2; in US true-positive nodes, it was 6.8 mm2. US sensitivity increased with increasing Breslow thickness of the primary melanoma (0% for ≤1 mm thickness, 11.9% for >4 mm thickness). US sensitivity was not significantly greater with higher trial center volume or with pre-US lymphoscintigraphy. Conclusion: In the MSLT-II screening phase population, SN tumor volume was usually too small to be reliably detected by US. For accurate nodal staging to guide the management of melanoma patients, US is not an effective substitute for SN biopsy.

[1]  M. Nielsen,et al.  Targeted ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology for sentinel node diagnostics in early-stage melanoma: a validation study , 2018, Melanoma research.

[2]  A. Gesierich,et al.  Completion Dissection or Observation for Sentinel‐Node Metastasis in Melanoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  C. Berking,et al.  Complete lymph node dissection versus no dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy positive melanoma (DeCOG-SLT): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  M. Bigby,et al.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  A. Eggermont,et al.  Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology as an addendum to sentinel lymph node biopsy can perfect the staging strategy in melanoma patients. , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[6]  A. Eggermont,et al.  Sonographic Criteria for Diagnosing Sentinel Node Metastases in Melanoma Patients , 2014, Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound.

[7]  T. Bieber,et al.  Role of high-resolution ultrasound and PET/CT imaging for preoperative characterization of sentinel lymph nodes in cutaneous melanoma. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  G. Botti,et al.  Can High-Resolution Ultrasound Avoid the Sentinel Lymph-node Biopsy Procedure in the Staging Process of Patients with Stage I–II Cutaneous Melanoma? , 2012, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[9]  J. Klode,et al.  Advantages of preoperative ultrasound in conjunction with lymphoscintigraphy in detecting malignant melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective analysis in 221 patients with malignant melanoma AJCC Stages I and II , 2012, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[10]  V. Sondak,et al.  Preoperative Ultrasound is Not Useful for Identifying Nodal Metastasis in Melanoma Patients Undergoing Sentinel Node Biopsy: Preoperative Ultrasound in Clinically Node-Negative Melanoma , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  M. Schön,et al.  Lymph node ultrasound during melanoma follow-up significantly improves metastasis detection compared with clinical examination alone: a study on 433 patients , 2011, Melanoma research.

[12]  L. Haydu,et al.  Ultrasound assessment of lymph nodes in the management of early‐stage melanoma , 2011, Journal of surgical oncology.

[13]  T. Bieber,et al.  High-Resolution Ultrasound Combined with Power Doppler Sonography Can Reduce the Number of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsies in Cutaneous Melanoma , 2011, Dermatology.

[14]  Yan Xing,et al.  Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  V. de Giorgi,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Filter Role in AJCC Stage I/II Melanoma Patients , 2011, Oncology.

[16]  A. Eggermont,et al.  The value of preoperative ultrasound (after lymphoscintigraphy) in conjunction with pre-sentinel lymph node biopsy fine-needle aspiration outweighs the usage of ultrasound alone in conjunction with lymphoscintigraphy: the need for an algorithm. , 2010, Melanoma research.

[17]  A. Eggermont,et al.  Ultrasound morphology criteria predict metastatic disease of the sentinel nodes in patients with melanoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  R. Scolyer,et al.  Targeted high-resolution ultrasound is not an effective substitute for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M. Schmid-Wendtner,et al.  The Use of High‐Resolution Ultrasonography for Preoperative Detection of Metastases in Sentinel Lymph Nodes of Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma , 2009, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[20]  A. Eggermont,et al.  Rotterdam Criteria for sentinel node (SN) tumor burden and the accuracy of ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): can US-guided FNAC replace SN staging in patients with melanoma? , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  A. Eggermont,et al.  Impact of molecular staging methods in primary melanoma: reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of ultrasound-guided aspirate of the sentinel node does not improve diagnostic accuracy, but RT-PCR of peripheral blood does predict survival. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  S. Chagnon,et al.  The contribution of high-resolution ultrasonography in preoperatively detecting sentinel-node metastases in melanoma patients , 2007, Melanoma research.

[23]  Martina Kron,et al.  Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology prior to Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma Patients , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  J. Peterse,et al.  Ultrasonography and Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology in the Preoperative Evaluation of Melanoma Patients Eligible for Sentinel Node Biopsy , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[25]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  N. Cascinelli,et al.  Sentinel and nonsentinel node status in stage IB and II melanoma patients: two-step prognostic indicators of survival. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  P. G. Lang,et al.  Sentinel Node Biopsy for Early-Stage Melanoma: Accuracy and Morbidity in MSLT-I, an International Multicenter Trial , 2006 .

[28]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Sentinel Node Biopsy for Early-Stage Melanoma: Accuracy and Morbidity in MSLT-I, an International Multicenter Trial , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[29]  I. Stanganelli,et al.  The role of ultrasound of sentinel nodes in the pre- and post-operative evaluation of stage I melanoma patients , 2004, Melanoma research.

[30]  A. Cochran,et al.  Accurate evaluation of nodal tissues for the presence of tumor is central to the sentinel node approach. , 2005, Cancer treatment and research.

[31]  M. Hočevar,et al.  The role of preoperative ultrasonography in reducing the number of sentinel lymph node procedures in melanoma , 2004, Melanoma research.

[32]  R. Scolyer,et al.  Ultrasound Examination of Sentinel Nodes in the Initial Assessment of Patients With Primary Cutaneous Melanoma , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[33]  Mirto Foletto,et al.  The role of preoperative ultrasound scan in detecting lymph node metastasis before sentinel node biopsy in melanoma patients , 2003, Journal of surgical oncology.

[34]  G. Plewig,et al.  Value of ultrasonography compared with physical examination for the detection of locoregional metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma , 2003, Melanoma research.

[35]  A. Blum,et al.  Prospective evaluation of a follow-up schedule in cutaneous melanoma patients: recommendations for an effective follow-up strategy. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  W. Sterry,et al.  Efficacy of ultrasound B‐scan compared with physical examination in follow‐up of melanoma patients , 2001, Cancer.

[37]  Jonathan J. Lewis,et al.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Management of Patients With Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: Review of a Large Single-Institutional Experience With an Emphasis on Recurrence , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[38]  A. Blum,et al.  Ultrasound examination of regional lymph nodes significantly improves early detection of locoregional metastases during the follow‐up of patients with cutaneous melanoma , 2000, Cancer.

[39]  M. Ross,et al.  Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.