Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?

Repetition effects are often helpful in revealing information about mental structures and processes. Usually, positive effects have been observed when the stimuli or responses are repeated. However, in task shift studies it has also been found that response repetitions can produce negative effects if the task shifts. Although several mechanisms have been proposed to account for this interaction between task shifting and response repetition, many details remain open. Therefore, a series of four experiments was conducted to answer two questions. First, are motor responses necessary to produce response-related repetition effects, or is response activation sufficient? Second, does the risk of an accidental re-execution of the last response affect the repetition costs? The results show that response activation alone can produce repetition effects. Furthermore, the risk of accidental response re-execution largely modulates these effects.

[1]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Serial Choice Reaction-time as a Function of Response versus Signal-and-Response Repetition , 1965, Nature.

[2]  G D Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  P. Quinlan Sequential effects in auditory choice reaction time tasks , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: evidence from two-component task shifts. , 2001 .

[5]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Repetition effects with categorizable stimulus and response sets. , 1993 .

[6]  T Kleinsorge,et al.  Response repetition benefits and costs. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[7]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[8]  B. Hommel Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  R. Proctor,et al.  Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Dependence and Independence in Responding to Double Stimulation : A Comparison of Stop , Change , and Dual-Task Paradigms , 1986 .

[11]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[12]  B. Hommel,et al.  Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  P. Bertelson S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task , 1963 .

[14]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space , 1999 .

[15]  G. Stone,et al.  Sequential effects in two- and four-choice tasks , 1972 .

[16]  B. Hommel Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[17]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. , 1991 .

[18]  A. Welford THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[19]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. , 2001 .

[20]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[21]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple thoughts and actions: II. Stop-signal studies of repetition priming. , 1985 .

[22]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[23]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Modelling cognitive control in task switching and ageing , 2001 .

[24]  I. Koch,et al.  The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  R Hübner,et al.  On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: evidence from two-component task shifts. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  J. Duncan Divided attention: the whole is more than the sum of its parts. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  M C Smith,et al.  Repetition effect and short-term memory. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  N. Meiran Task Rule-Congruency and Simon-Like Effects in Switching between Spatial Tasks , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  N. Meiran Modeling cognitive control in task-switching , 2000, Psychological research.

[30]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  K. Cullen,et al.  3.20 – Procedural Learning: VOR , 2008 .

[32]  Thomas Kleinsorge,et al.  Preparation for a forthcoming task is sufficient to produce subsequent shift costs , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching , 2000 .

[34]  P M Rabbitt,et al.  Repetition Effects and Signal Classification Strategies in Serial Choice-Response Tasks , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[36]  Stefanie Schuch,et al.  The costs of changing the representation of action: response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching , 2003, Neuron.