Quantifying the Severity of Metopic Craniosynostosis: A Pilot Study Application of Machine Learning in Craniofacial Surgery.

The standard for diagnosing metopic craniosynostosis (CS) utilizes computed tomography (CT) imaging and physical exam, but there is no standardized method for determining disease severity. Previous studies using interfrontal angles have evaluated differences in specific skull landmarks; however, these measurements are difficult to readily ascertain in clinical practice and fail to assess the complete skull contour. This pilot project employs machine learning algorithms to combine statistical shape information with expert ratings to generate a novel objective method of measuring the severity of metopic CS.Expert ratings of normal and metopic skull CT images were collected. Skull-shape analysis was conducted using ShapeWorks software. Machine-learning was used to combine the expert ratings with our shape analysis model to predict the severity of metopic CS using CT images. Our model was then compared to the gold standard using interfrontal angles.Seventeen metopic skull CT images of patients 5 to 15 months old were assigned a severity by 18 craniofacial surgeons, and 65 nonaffected controls were included with a 0 severity. Our model accurately correlated the level of skull deformity with severity (P < 0.10) and predicted the severity of metopic CS more often than models using interfrontal angles (χ = 5.46, P = 0.019).This is the first study that combines shape information with expert ratings to generate an objective measure of severity for metopic CS. This method may help clinicians easily quantify the severity and perform robust longitudinal assessments of the condition.

[1]  D. Rénier,et al.  Functional Outcome after Surgery for Trigonocephaly , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  Martin Styner,et al.  Shape Modeling and Analysis with Entropy-Based Particle Systems , 2007, IPMI.

[3]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[4]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis. , 1982, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  Alexander C Allori,et al.  Interfrontal Angle for Characterization of Trigonocephaly: Part 1: Development and Validation of a Tool for Diagnosis of Metopic Synostosis , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[6]  D. Steinbacher,et al.  Simulated Fronto-Orbital Advancement Achieves Reproducible Results in Metopic Synostosis , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  W. Harkness,et al.  The Effectiveness of Papilledema as an Indicator of Raised Intracranial Pressure in Children with Craniosynostosis , 1996 .

[8]  Hong Gee Roh,et al.  Craniosynostosis : Updates in Radiologic Diagnosis , 2016, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[9]  S Oi,et al.  Trigonocephaly (metopic synostosis) , 1987, Child's Nervous System.

[10]  Daniela M. Witten,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R , 2013 .

[11]  A. Allori,et al.  Objective Assessment of the Interfrontal Angle for Severity Grading and Operative Decision-Making in Metopic Synostosis , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  W. Grove,et al.  A latent trait finite mixture model for the analysis of rating agreement. , 1993, Biometrics.

[13]  Carlos S. Mendoza,et al.  What’s in a Name? Accurately Diagnosing Metopic Craniosynostosis Using a Computational Approach , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  Phillip K. T. Chen,et al.  Metopic Synostosis: Quantitative Assessment of Presenting Deformity and Surgical Results Based on CT Scans , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  D. Rizopoulos,et al.  Increase of prevalence of craniosynostosis. , 2016, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[17]  Arun K Gosain,et al.  Classification and Management of Metopic Craniosynostosis , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[18]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[19]  Scott P Bartlett,et al.  Metopic Synostosis: Defining the Temporal Sequence of Normal Suture Fusion and Differentiating It from Synostosis on the Basis of Computed Tomography Images , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  Selection of a horizontal reference plane in 3D evaluation: Identifying facial asymmetry and occlusal cant in orthognathic surgery planning , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[21]  W. K. Chong,et al.  The effectiveness of papilledema as an indicator of raised intracranial pressure in children with craniosynostosis. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[22]  J. Persing,et al.  Classification of Trigonocephaly in Metopic Synostosis , 2012, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  Yoon-Ah Kook,et al.  New three-dimensional cephalometric analyses among adults with a skeletal Class I pattern and normal occlusion , 2013, Korean journal of orthodontics.

[24]  S. Loudon,et al.  Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Advance Online Article , 2015 .

[25]  Salvador Ruiz-Correa,et al.  NEW SEVERITY INDICES FOR QUANTIFYING SINGLE‐SUTURE METOPIC CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS , 2008, Neurosurgery.