Target viewing time and velocity effects on prehension

Abstract The goal of the present study was to understand which characteristics (movement time or velocity) of target motion are important in the control and coordination of the transport and grasp-preshape components of prehensile movements during an interception task. Subjects were required to reach toward, grasp and lift an object as it entered a target area. Targets approached along a track at four velocities (500, 750, 1000 and 1250 mm/s) which were presented in two conditions. In the distance-controlled condition, targets moving at all velocities traveled the same distance. In the viewing-time-controlled condition, combinations of velocity and starting distances were performed such that the moving target was visible for 1000 ms for all trials. Analyses of kinematic data revealed that when, target distance was controlled, velocity affected all transport-dependent measures; however, when viewing time was controlled, these dependent measures were no longer affected by target velocity. Thus, the use of velocity information was limited in the viewing-time-controlled condition, and subjects used other information, such as target movement time, when generating the transport component of the prehensile movement. For the grasp-preshape component, both peak aperture and peak-aperture velocity increased as target velocity increased, regardless of condition, indicating that target velocity was used to control the spatial aspects of aperture formation. However, the timing of peak aperture was affected by target velocity in the distance-controlled condition, but not in the viewing-time-controlled condition. These results provide evidence for the autonomous generation of the spatial and temporal aspects of grasp preshape. Thus, an independence between the transport and grasp-preshape phases was found, whereby the use of target velocity as a source of information for generating the transport component was limited; however, target velocity was an important source of information in the grasp-preshape phase.

[1]  M. Jeannerod.  Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[2]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Perceptual Structures and Distributed Motor Control , 1981 .

[3]  A. Wing,et al.  The Contribution of the Thumb to Reaching Movements , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  M. Jeannerod.  The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  A. Wing,et al.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  S. A. Wallace,et al.  Temporal constraints in the control of prehensile movement. , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  S. Keele,et al.  Timing Functions of The Cerebellum , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  John F. Kalaska,et al.  Reaching movements to visual targets: neuronal representations of sensori-motor transformations , 1991 .

[11]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: Influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  J. A. Scott Kelso,et al.  The perceptual guidance of grasping a moving object , 1992 .

[13]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  A R Gibson,et al.  The importance of hand use to discharge of interpositus neurones of the monkey. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Mark Nawrot,et al.  Motion perception deficits from midline cerebellar lesions in human , 1995, Vision Research.

[16]  B J McFadyen,et al.  Visuomotor control when reaching toward and grasping moving targets. , 1996, Acta psychologica.

[17]  R. Ivry.  The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Prehension Movements: The Visuomotor Channels Hypothesis Revisited , 1996 .

[19]  Richard lvry,et al.  Cerebellar timing systems. , 1997 .

[20]  R. Ivry.  Cerebellar timing systems. , 1997, International review of neurobiology.