Fixed dose combination therapies in primary cardiovascular disease prevention in different groups: an individual participant meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of fixed dose combination (FDC) medications on cardiovascular outcomes in different age groups in an individual participant meta-analysis of three primary prevention randomised trials. METHODS Participants at intermediate risk (17.7% mean 10-year Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score), randomised to FDC of two or more antihypertensives and a statin with or without aspirin, or to their respective control, were followed up for 5 years. Age groups were <60, 60-65 and ≥65 years. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or revascularisation. Cox proportional HRs and 95% CIs were computed within each age group. RESULTS The primary outcome risk was reduced by 37% (3.3% in FDC vs 5.2% in control (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.74)) in the total population of 18 162 participants with larger benefits in older groups (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.78, 60 to 65 years) and (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.70, ≥65 years), as were their numbers needed to treat to avoid one primary outcome: 53 and 33, respectively. The primary outcome risk was reduced in the two oldest groups with FDC with aspirin (n=8951) by 54% and 54%, and without aspirin (n=12 061) by 34% and 38%. Dizziness, the most frequent FDC adverse effects, was higher in participants aged <65 years. Aspirin was not associated with significant bleeding excess. CONCLUSIONS In participants with intermediate cardiovascular risk, FDCs produce larger cardiovascular benefits in older individuals, which appear greater with aspirin. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER HOPE-3, NCT00468923; TIPS-3, NCT016464137; PolyIran, NCT01271985.

[1]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  Polypill Strategy in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention. , 2022, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Malekzadeh,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of fixed-dose combination pill (Polypill) in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic literature review , 2022, PloS one.

[3]  L. Perdue,et al.  Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. , 2022, JAMA.

[4]  Tumaini R. Coker,et al.  Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. , 2022, JAMA.

[5]  K. O'Brien,et al.  Evaluating the Association Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction and Relative and Absolute Effects of Statin Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2022, JAMA internal medicine.

[6]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Fixed-dose combination therapies with and without aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an individual participant data meta-analysis , 2021, The Lancet.

[7]  R. Collins,et al.  Age-stratified and blood-pressure-stratified effects of blood-pressure-lowering pharmacotherapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis , 2021, The Lancet.

[8]  J. Aronson,et al.  Associations between statins and adverse events in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses , 2021, BMJ.

[9]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Polypill with or without Aspirin in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Exploring New Models for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: The Heart Outcomes Prevention and Evaluation 4 (HOPE 4) Canada Pilot Study , 2020, CJC open.

[11]  S. Yusuf,et al.  A community-based comprehensive intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk in hypertension (HOPE 4): a cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[12]  S. Yusuf,et al.  The cost implication of primary prevention in the HOPE 3 trial. , 2019, European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes.

[13]  John Fuller,et al.  Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials , 2019, The Lancet.

[14]  A. Roddick,et al.  Association of Aspirin Use for Primary Prevention With Cardiovascular Events and Bleeding Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2019, JAMA.

[15]  F. Hobbs,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of use of a polypill versus usual care or best practice for primary prevention in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease , 2017, PloS one.