Improving system reliability by failure-mode avoidance including four concept design strategies

To be reliable, a system must be robust—it must avoid failure modes even in the presence of a broad range of conditions including harsh environments, changing operational demands, and internal deterioration. This paper discusses and codifies techniques for robust system design that operate by expanding the range of conditions under which the system functions. A distinction is introduced between one-sided and two-sided failure modes, and four strategies are presented for creating larger windows between sets of one-sided failure modes. Each strategy is illustrated through two examples from industrial practice. For each strategy, one example is from paper handling and another is from jet engines. By showing that every strategy has been successfully applied to each system, we seek to illustrate that the strategies are widely applicable and highly effective. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 8: 245–261, 2005

[1]  Michael Pecht,et al.  The reliability physics approach to failure prediction modelling , 1990 .

[2]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  principles in design , 1990 .

[3]  Don P Clausing.  Operating Window: An Engineering Measure for Robustness , 2004, Technometrics.

[4]  M. Pecht,et al.  Physics-of-failure: an approach to reliable product development , 1995, IEEE 1995 International Integrated Reliability Workshop. Final Report.

[5]  G. Altshuller.  Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .

[6]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Michael G. Pecht,et al.  The "trouble not identified" phenomenon in automotive electronics , 2002, Microelectron. Reliab..

[8]  Bernard L. Koff,et al.  Gas Turbine Technology Evolution: A Designers Perspective , 2004 .

[9]  E. J. Borowski.  The harper collins dictionary of mathematics / by E.J. Borowski and J.M. Borwein , 1991 .

[10]  Michael Pecht,et al.  Physics-of-failure assessment of a cruise control module , 1999 .

[11]  A. Lefebvre.  Gas Turbine Combustion , 1983 .

[12]  Don Clausing,et al.  Total Quality Development , 1993 .

[13]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Taguchi on Robust Technology Development , 1992 .

[14]  R. P. Lohmann,et al.  The Vorbix Burner—A New Approach to Gas Turbine Combustors , 1976 .

[15]  Carroll Vincent Sidwell.  On the impact of variability and assembly on turbine blade cooling flow and oxidation life , 2004 .

[16]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  3.2.1 Failure Modes And Two Types Of Robustness , 2004 .

[17]  Singiresu S Rao,et al.  Reliability-Based Design , 1992 .

[18]  Nicholas Cumpsty.  Jet Propulsion: A Simple Guide to the Aerodynamic and Thermodynamic Design and Performance of Jet Engines , 1997 .

[19]  V. Roshan Joseph,et al.  Failure Amplification Method: An Information Maximization Approach to Categorical Response Optimization , 2004, Technometrics.