In vitro degradation and biocompatibility of poly(DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone) nerve guides.

Bridging nerve gaps by means of autologous nerve grafts involves donor nerve graft harvesting. Recent studies have focused on the use of alternative methods, and one of these is the use of biodegradable nerve guides. After serving their function, nerve guides should degrade to avoid a chronic foreign body reaction. The in vitro degradation, in vitro cytotoxicity, hemocompatibility, and short-term in vivo foreign body reaction of poly((65)/(35) ((85)/(15) (L)/(D)) lactide-epsilon-caprolactone) nerve guides was studied. The in vitro degradation characteristics of poly(DLLA-epsilon-CL) nerve guides were monitored at 2-week time intervals during a period of 22 weeks. Weight loss, degree of swelling of the tube wall, mechanical strength, thermal properties, and the intrinsic viscosity of the nerve guides were determined. Cytotoxicity was studied by measuring the cell proliferation inhibition index (CPII) on mouse fibroblasts in vitro. Cell growth was evaluated by cell counting, while morphology was assessed by light microscopy. Hemocompatibility was evaluated using a thrombin generation assay and a complement convertase assay. The foreign body reaction against poly(DLLA-epsilon-CL) nerve guides was investigated by examining toluidine blue stained sections. The in vitro degradation data showed that poly(DLLA-epsilon-CL) nerve guides do not swell, maintain their mechanical strength and flexibility for a period of about 8-10 weeks, and start to lose mass after about 10 weeks. Poly(DLLA-epsilon-CL) nerve guides were classified as noncytotoxic, as cytotoxicity tests demonstrated that cell morphology was not affected (CPII 0%). The thrombin generation assay and complement convertase assay indicated that the material is highly hemocompatible. The foreign body reaction against the biomaterial was mild with a light priming of the immunesystem. The results presented in this study demonstrate that poly((65)/(35) ((85)/(15) (L)/(D)) lactide-epsilon-caprolactone) nerve guides are biocompatible, and show good in vitro degradation characteristics, making these biodegradable nerve guides promising candidates for bridging peripheral nerve defects up to several centimeters.

[1]  D. Grijpma.  High impact strength poly(lactide) tough biodegradable materials. , 1993 .

[2]  R. Sidman,et al.  Peripheral nerve repair with bioresorbable prosthesis. , 1983, Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.

[3]  Hayes Gj,et al.  Experimental improvements in the use of Silastic cuff for peripheral nerve repair. , 1968 .

[4]  S. M. Li,et al.  Bioresorbability and biocompatibility of aliphatic polyesters , 1992 .

[5]  W. D. den Dunnen,et al.  Biological performance of a degradable poly(lactic acid-epsilon-caprolactone) nerve guide: influence of tube dimensions. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  P H Robinson,et al.  Light-microscopic and electron-microscopic evaluation of short-term nerve regeneration using a biodegradable poly(DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolacton) nerve guide. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  D. Grijpma,et al.  In vivo and in vitro degradation of poly[50/50 (85/15L/D)LA/ε-CL], and the implications for the use in nerve reconstruction , 2000 .

[8]  Yoshito Ikada,et al.  A new resorbable monofilament suture , 1998 .

[9]  P H Robinson,et al.  Poly(DL‐lactide‐ϵ‐caprolactone) nerve guides perform better than autologous nerve grafts , 1996, Microsurgery.

[10]  R. L. Walton,et al.  Autogenous vein graft repair of digital nerve defects in the finger: a retrospective clinical study. , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  P H Robinson,et al.  [A degradable artificial nerve guide to bridge peripheral nerve defects]. , 2003, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[12]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Biodegradation and tumorigenicity of implanted plates made from a copolymer of ε‐caprolactone and L‐lactide in rat , 1998 .

[13]  Frank M Szaba,et al.  Roles for thrombin and fibrin(ogen) in cytokine/chemokine production and macrophage adhesion in vivo. , 2002, Blood.

[14]  A Gramsbergen,et al.  Biodegradable p(DLLA‐ϵ‐CL) nerve guides versus autologous nerve grafts: Electromyographic and video analysis , 2001, Muscle & nerve.

[15]  C. Krarup,et al.  Monkey median nerve repaired by nerve graft or collagen nerve guide tube , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Meek,et al.  Evaluation of Functional Nerve Recovery after Reconstruction with a New Biodegradable Poly (DL-Lactide-∊-Caprolactone) Nerve Guide , 1997, The International journal of artificial organs.

[17]  J W Eaton,et al.  Molecular basis of biomaterial-mediated foreign body reactions. , 2001, Blood.

[18]  S. Bowald,et al.  Regeneration of peripheral nerve through a polyglactin tube , 1982, Muscle & nerve.

[19]  A. Erbengi,et al.  Arterial bridging for repair of peripheral nerve gap: a comparative study , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[20]  A. Schindler,et al.  Aliphatic polyesters. I. The degradation of poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) in vivo , 1981 .

[21]  S T Li,et al.  Peripheral nerve repair with collagen conduits. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[22]  G L Kimmel,et al.  Aliphatic polyesters II. The degradation of poly (DL-lactide), poly (epsilon-caprolactone), and their copolymers in vivo. , 1981, Biomaterials.

[23]  Liu Hm.  Growth factors and extracellular matrix in peripheral nerve regeneration, studied with a nerve chamber. , 1996 .

[24]  R. Donoff,et al.  Nerve Regeneration Through Collagen Tubes , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[25]  D. Ceballos,et al.  Peripheral nerve regeneration through bioresorbable and durable nerve guides. , 1996, Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS.

[26]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Trophism, Tropism and Specificity in Nerve Regeneration , 1994, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery.

[27]  James N. Campbell,et al.  Complications from silicon‐polymer intubulation of nerves , 1989, Microsurgery.

[28]  W. D. den Dunnen,et al.  Long-term evaluation of degradation and foreign-body reaction of subcutaneously implanted poly(DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone). , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[29]  P H Robinson,et al.  Long‐term evaluation of nerve regeneration in a biodegradable nerve guide , 1993, Microsurgery.

[30]  V. Crescenzi,et al.  Thermodynamics of fusion of poly-β-propiolactone and poly-ϵ-caprolactone. comparative analysis of the melting of aliphatic polylactone and polyester chains , 1972 .

[31]  W. van Oeveren,et al.  Comparison of coagulation activity tests in vitro for selected biomaterials. , 2002, Artificial Organs.

[32]  J. M. Schakenraad,et al.  A new PLLA/PCL copolymer for nerve regeneration , 1993 .

[33]  M. Meek,et al.  Clinical Use of Nerve Conduits in Peripheral-Nerve Repair: Review of the Literature , 2002, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery.

[34]  Mollnes Te.  Biocompatibility: complement as mediator of tissue damage and as indicator of incompatibility. , 1997, Experimental and clinical immunogenetics.

[35]  D. Grijpma,et al.  High molecular weight copolymers of l-lactide and ε-caprolactone as biodegradable elastomeric implant materials , 1991 .

[36]  E. Engvall,et al.  Neurite-promoting factors and extracellular matrix components accumulating in vivo within nerve regeneration chambers , 1984, Brain Research.