Should All Cars Be Electric by 2025? The Electric Car Debate in Europe

The car is still the most common mode of transport in Western countries, particularly so across the European Union, as it accounts for about two-thirds of daily commuting. So far, measures aiming to reduce automobile traffic and incentives for the modal shift to public transport and non-polluting methods of travel (walking, cycling, etc.) have had little effect. Moreover, the car lies at the core of a very complex system that has proven to be difficult to unlock. In light of these challenges, using new types of engine power may appear to be a solution. Electric vehicles have the potential to improve the efficiency, affordability, and sustainability of the transport system. However, there remains much uncertainty as to how such a transition from one type of engine to another may unfold, and where it could take place within the European context. In June 2017, the H2020 project SHAPE-ENERGY launched an online debate on the Debating Europe platform with the question: “Should all cars be electric by 2025?”. The aim of the debate was to elicit citizens views on whether the goal could be reached, how and with which consequences. The diversity of the vantage points that have appeared in the subsequent discussion generated by the strands of debate allows us to bring into discussion the viewpoints and arguments that are not often addressed in the literature on the adoption of electric cars in a comprehensive way. The article sheds light on those debates across Europe, in order to bring new insights to European policymakers that are seeking to promote the market for electric vehicles. It also broadens the scope and offers important contributions to scholarly debates on the diffusion and adoption of such vehicles.

[1]  E. Shove,et al.  Time, consumption and everyday life: practice, materiality and culture , 2009 .

[2]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Global Lithium Availability , 2011 .

[3]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Justice, poverty, and electricity decarbonization , 2019, The Electricity Journal.

[4]  Alenka Poplin,et al.  The Participatory Cube: A Framework for Analysis of Online Participation Platforms , 2013 .

[5]  transports urbains : quelles politiques pour demain ? - Rapport du groupe présidé par Roland Ries , 2003 .

[6]  Kristin Ystmark Bjerkan,et al.  Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway , 2016 .

[7]  B. Wee,et al.  The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption , 2014 .

[8]  Zizi Papacharissi.  The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[9]  N. Baym.  The emergence of on-line community , 1998 .

[10]  Thomas Erickson.  Persistant Conversation: An Introduction , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  Sylvie Fol,et al.  Coping with the costs of car dependency: A system of expedients used by low-income households on the outskirts of Dijon and Paris , 2017, Transport Policy.

[12]  Julia Hildermeier,et al.  Shaping an Emerging Market for Electric Cars: How politics in France and Germany Transform the European Automotive Industry , 2012 .

[13]  Glenn Lyons,et al.  Automobility in transition?: A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport , 2012 .

[14]  Derrick L. Cogburn,et al.  From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign , 2011 .

[15]  Kirsten E H Jenkins,et al.  Energy justice : a conceptual review , 2016 .

[16]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Nurturing a Regime Shift Toward Electro-mobility in Norway , 2018, The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems.

[17]  Anna Revette.  This time it’s different: lithium extraction, cultural politics and development in Bolivia , 2017 .

[18]  G. Kramer,et al.  A multi-level perspective on the introduction of hydrogen and battery-electric vehicles , 2010 .

[19]  Nathalie Ortar.  Dealing with energy crises: Working and living arrangements in peri-urban France , 2016 .

[20]  Suzanna Long,et al.  Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions , 2012 .

[21]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Creating energy citizenship through material participation , 2018, Social studies of science.

[22]  B. Sovacool.  Experts, theories, and electric mobility transitions: Toward an integrated conceptual framework for the adoption of electric vehicles , 2017 .

[23]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Green and gendered? Cultural perspectives on the road towards electric vehicles in Norway , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[24]  Robert Gross,et al.  The future of lithium availability for electric vehicle batteries , 2014 .

[25]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Fear and loathing of electric vehicles: The reactionary rhetoric of range anxiety , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[27]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross-National Measures , 1993 .

[28]  D. Maingueneau.  L'analyse du discours. , 2008 .

[29]  Stefan Bouzarovski,et al.  The energy divide: Integrating energy transitions, regional inequalities and poverty trends in the European Union , 2016, European urban and regional studies.

[30]  Paolo Cottone,et al.  One, no one, one hundred thousand energy transitions in Europe: The quest for a cultural approach , 2016 .

[31]  T. Bridgeman,et al.  Distribution of carbon emissions in the UK : implications for domestic energy policy , 2013 .

[32]  Michel Marcoccia,et al.  L’analyse conversationnelle des forums de discussion : questionnements méthodologiques , 2004 .

[33]  D. ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Unpacking the spaces and politics of energy poverty: path-dependencies, deprivation and fuel switching in post-communist Hungary , 2016 .

[34]  Laura Watts.  Energy at the End of the World: An Orkney Islands Saga , 2018 .

[35]  Gordon Walker,et al.  The dynamics of energy demand: Change, rhythm and synchronicity , 2014 .

[36]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Expert perceptions of low-carbon transitions: investigating the challenges of electricity decarbonisation in the Nordic region , 2018 .

[37]  F. Geels.  Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[38]  Nuh ERDOGAN,et al.  A fast and efficient coordinated vehicle-to-grid discharging control scheme for peak shaving in power distribution system , 2018 .

[39]  Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu,et al.  Electric mobility in Europe: A comprehensive review of motivators and barriers in decision making processes , 2018 .

[40]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  How might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current “Pioneer” owners? , 2016 .

[41]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Accelerating the Global Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Barriers and Drivers , 2015 .

[42]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  A Transformative Practice? Meaning, Competence, and Material Aspects of Driving Electric Cars in Norway , 2014 .

[43]  H. Nowotny.  Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge , 2003 .

[44]  Thomas Franke,et al.  Understanding charging behaviour of electric vehicle users , 2013 .

[45]  Timothy G. Townsend,et al.  A review on the growing concern and potential management strategies of waste lithium-ion batteries , 2018 .

[46]  A. Forty.  Aluminum Dreams: The Making of Light Modernity , 2015 .

[47]  A. Talantsev.  Who Gains and Who Loses in the Shift to Electric Vehicles : Impact Assessment through Multi-criteria Multi-stakeholder Analysis , 2017 .

[48]  Awais Piracha,et al.  Mobility in daily life: between freedom and unfreedom , 2010 .

[49]  Les routines du quotidien à l’épreuve de la mobilité électrique , 2015 .

[50]  Holger Dittus,et al.  Project InitiativE-BW - Real-world driving, energy demand, user experiences and emissions of electrified vehicle fleets , 2016 .

[51]  J. Thomassen.  Political Representation in the European Union , 1998 .

[52]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[53]  Michel Marcoccia,et al.  L'animation d'un espace numérique de discussion : l''exemple des forums usenet , 2001, Document Numérique.

[54]  John Urry,et al.  Governance, flows, and the end of the car system? , 2008 .

[55]  J. Urry.  The ‘System’ of Automobility , 2004 .

[56]  Johan Jansson,et al.  Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda , 2015 .

[57]  Mikołaj Walkowiak.  The efficiency of electric cars for mitigating CO2 emissions in Poland , 2016 .

[58]  J. Urry,et al.  Enacting the social , 2004 .

[59]  J. Tarascon,et al.  Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. , 2015, Nature chemistry.

[60]  S. Coleman,et al.  Under Construction: The Field of Online Deliberation Research , 2012 .

[61]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Vehicle-to-Grid , 2019 .

[62]  Fred Steward,et al.  Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[63]  Mikael Höök,et al.  Lithium availability and future production outlooks , 2013 .

[64]  Victor Sreeram,et al.  The investigation of the major factors influencing plug-in electric vehicle driving patterns and charging behaviour , 2015 .

[65]  K. Lucas,et al.  The affordability of household transport costs: quantifying the incidence of car-related economic stress in Great Britain , 2016 .

[66]  K. Lucas,et al.  Reprint of Transport poverty and fuel poverty in the UK: From analogy to comparison , 2018, Transport Policy.

[67]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes , 2011 .

[68]  Darren McCauley,et al.  Advancing energy justice: The triumvirate of tenets , 2013 .