Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Grace J Gang | Jeffrey H Siewerdsen | Jerry L Prince | J Webster Stayman | Daniel J Tward | W Zbijewski | Junghoon Lee | Junghoon Lee | J. Siewerdsen | W. Zbijewski | D. Tward | J. Stayman | G. Gang
[1] A. Burgess. Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[2] Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al. Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT. , 2008, Medical physics.
[3] Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al. Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual-energy x-ray images. , 2008, Medical physics.
[4] R. F. Wagner,et al. Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.
[5] H. Barrett,et al. Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[6] J A Rowlands,et al. Effects of characteristic x rays on the noise power spectra and detective quantum efficiency of photoconductive x-ray detectors. , 2001, Medical physics.
[7] David Gur,et al. Tomosynthesis: potential clinical role in breast imaging. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[8] D. Jaffray,et al. A framework for noise-power spectrum analysis of multidimensional images. , 2002, Medical physics.
[9] H H Barrett,et al. Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[10] H. Barrett,et al. Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[11] Wei Zhao,et al. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector. , 2003, Medical physics.
[12] J H Siewerdsen,et al. Optimization of dual-energy imaging systems using generalized NEQ and imaging task. , 2006, Medical physics.
[13] J. Swets. Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings , 1964 .
[14] J H Siewerdsen,et al. Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT. , 2010, Medical physics.
[15] R P Velthuizen,et al. On the statistical nature of mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.
[16] Aruna A. Vedula,et al. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.
[17] C E Metz,et al. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns. , 1984, Radiology.
[18] J H Siewerdsen,et al. Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors. , 2005, Medical physics.
[19] C. Metz. Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[20] Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al. Cone-beam CT with a flat-panel imager: noise considerations for fully 3D computed tomography , 2000, Medical Imaging.
[21] Christobel Saunders,et al. New diagnostic techniques for breast cancer detection. , 2008, Future oncology.
[22] D. M. Green,et al. Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .
[23] Laurie L Fajardo,et al. Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[24] Aldo Badano,et al. A statistical, task-based evaluation method for three-dimensional x-ray breast imaging systems using variable-background phantoms. , 2010, Medical physics.
[25] Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al. Three-dimensional NEQ transfer characteristics of volume CT using direct- and indirect-detection flat-panel imagers , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[26] Arthur E. Burgess,et al. Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis , 1999, Medical Imaging.
[27] Thomas Mertelmeier,et al. Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.
[28] Ehsan Samei,et al. Optimization of dual energy contrast enhanced breast tomosynthesis for improved mammographic lesion detection and diagnosis , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[29] Ehsan Samei,et al. Quantification of radiographic image quality based on patient anatomical contrast-to-noise ratio: a preliminary study with chest images , 2010, Medical Imaging.
[30] Ehsan Samei,et al. Physical measures of image quality in photostimulable phosphor radiographic systems , 1997, Medical Imaging.
[31] Rebecca Fahrig,et al. Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D NEQ for cone-beam CT and tomosynthesis , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[32] Ruola Ning,et al. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[33] R. F. Wagner,et al. Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[34] Peter G. J. Barten,et al. Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its e ects on image quality , 1999 .
[35] J Yorkston,et al. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. , 1998, Medical physics.
[36] A E Burgess,et al. Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[37] J H Siewerdsen,et al. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype. , 2006, Medical physics.
[38] D. Jaffray,et al. Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography). , 2000, Medical physics.
[39] Miguel P Eckstein,et al. Evaluation of internal noise methods for Hotelling observer models. , 2007, Medical physics.
[40] Wei Zhao,et al. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.
[41] D. C. Barber,et al. Medical Imaging-The Assessment of Image Quality , 1996 .
[42] R M Nishikawa,et al. Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise. , 2010, Medical physics.
[43] E Samei,et al. Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. , 1999, Radiology.
[44] Ehsan Samei,et al. Subtle lung nodules: influence of local anatomic variations on detection. , 2003, Radiology.
[45] Kyle J Myers,et al. Channelized-ideal observer using Laguerre-Gauss channels in detection tasks involving non-Gaussian distributed lumpy backgrounds and a Gaussian signal. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[46] Kyle J. Myers,et al. Detection And Discrimination Of Known Signals In Inhomogeneous, Random Backgrounds , 1989, Medical Imaging.
[47] R. F. Wagner,et al. Application of information theory to the assessment of computed tomography. , 1979, Medical physics.
[48] Jie Yao,et al. Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.
[49] B. Dosher,et al. Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[50] H H Barrett,et al. Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[51] H H Barrett,et al. Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[52] H H Barrett,et al. Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[53] J. Baker,et al. A mathematical model platform for optimizing a multiprojection breast imaging system. , 2008, Medical physics.
[54] J Yorkston,et al. Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology. , 1997, Medical physics.
[55] H. Barrett,et al. Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[56] S. Mukherji,et al. Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 2: Clinical Applications , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.
[57] M D Silver. A method for including redundant data in computed tomography. , 2000, Medical physics.
[58] James T. Dobbins,et al. Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update. , 2009, European journal of radiology.
[59] Jie Liu,et al. Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks Simulating Malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[60] James T. Dobbins,et al. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest. , 2008, Journal of thoracic imaging.
[61] Joseph Y. Lo,et al. Visual image quality metrics for optimization of breast tomosynthesis acquisition technique , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[62] J A Rowlands,et al. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. , 1997, Medical physics.
[63] A. Burgess,et al. Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.
[64] L B Lusted,et al. Radiographic applications of signal detection theory. , 1972, Radiology.