Product Architecture and Product Development Process for Global Performance

In this chapter, we characterize the impact of product global performance on the choice of product architecture during the product development process. We classify product architectures into three categories: modular, hybrid, and integral. Existing research shows that the choice of product architecture during the new product development is a crucially strategic decision for a manufacturing firm. However, no single architecture is optimal in all cases; thus, analytic models are required to identify and discuss specific trade-offs associated with the choice of the optimal architecture under different circumstance. This chapter develops analytic models whose objectives are obtaining global performance of product through a modular/hybrid/integral architecture. Trade-offs between costs and expected benefits from different product architectures are analyzed and compared. Multifunction products and small size are used as examples to formalize the models and show the impact of the global performance characteristics. We also investigate how optimal architecture changes in response to the exogenous costs of system integrators. Some empirical implications obtained from this study show that if one considers global performance, modular architecture is an absolutely suboptimal decision and integral architecture is an all-the-time candidate for optimal architecture.

[1]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  The Variety of an Assortment , 1999 .

[2]  Michael J. Brusco,et al.  Staffing a Multiskilled Workforce with Varying Levels of Productivity: An Analysis of Cross‐training Policies* , 1998 .

[3]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[7]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Product Line Selection and Pricing with Modularity in Design , 2005, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[8]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[9]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[10]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[11]  Saifallah Benjaafar,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Manufacturing Flexibility , 1998 .

[12]  Christopher Alexander Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[13]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[14]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[15]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[16]  Karthik Ramachandran,et al.  Design Architecture and Introduction Timing for Rapidly Improving Industrial Products , 2008, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[17]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  Commonality in product design: Cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[19]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota , 1999 .

[20]  I. Nonaka Redundant, Overlapping Organization: A Japanese Approach to Managing the Innovation Process , 1990 .

[21]  Nancy Lea Hyer,et al.  The discipline of real cells , 1999 .

[22]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Agile workforce evaluation: a framework for cross-training and coordination , 2004 .

[23]  John T. Gourville,et al.  Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires , 2005 .

[24]  Yoke San Wong,et al.  A dynamic model for managing overlapped iterative product development , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Sebastian K. Fixson,et al.  Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions , 2005 .

[26]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[27]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[28]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach , 2005 .

[29]  Saifallah Benjaafar,et al.  Machine Sharing in Manufacturing Systems: Total Flexibility versus Chaining , 1998 .

[30]  Kamalini Ramdas MANAGING PRODUCT VARIETY: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW AND RESEARCH DIRECTIONS , 2003 .

[31]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Product Line Design and Production Technology , 2007 .

[32]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[33]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design: Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process , 1999 .

[35]  Juliana H. Mikkola,et al.  Capturing the Degree of Modularity Embedded in Product Architectures , 2006 .