Theoretical Foundation of Patient v. Population Preferences in Calculating QALYs

The cost-effectiveness of health care interventions is often evaluated using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as a measure of outcome. There is a debate on whether QALYs should use patient preferences as opposed to community preferences. This article shows that patient preferences have a theoretical foundation in preference-utilitarian theory and welfare economics. In contrast, this study found no compelling theoretical basis for community preferences. There is a need for further development of a normative framework to inform the choice of preference source.

[1]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Why health equity? , 2002, Health economics.

[2]  A. Beck,et al.  Maladaptive cognitive structures in depression. , 1978, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  Orsolya Lelkes.  Knowing what is good for you , 2006 .

[4]  R. Thomson,et al.  The potential use of decision analysis to support shared decision making in the face of uncertainty: the example of atrial fibrillation and warfarin anticoagulation , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[5]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 5 Adaptive preferences and women's options , 2001, Economics and Philosophy.

[6]  A. Gandjour,et al.  Utilitarian Theories Reconsidered: Common Misconceptions, More Recent Developments, and Health Policy Implications , 2003, Health Care Analysis.

[7]  Jan Abel Olsen,et al.  The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation: a preliminary normative analysis. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[8]  J. Harsanyi.  Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , 1955 .

[9]  C. John,et al.  Utilitarianism and beyond: Morality and the theory of rational behaviour , 1982 .

[10]  F. Hahn,et al.  On the Foundations of Welfare Economics: Utility, Capability and Practical Reason , 1996 .

[11]  P. Dolan.  Whose Preferences Count? , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[12]  C. Murray,et al.  Understanding DALYs (disability-adjusted life years). , 1997, Journal of health economics.

[13]  M. Weinstein,et al.  The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.

[14]  Ronald Dworkin,et al.  What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources , 1981 .

[15]  Erik Nord,et al.  Cost-Value Analysis in Health Care: Making Sense out of QALYS , 1999 .

[16]  Orsolya Lelkes.  Knowing What is Good for You. Empirical Analysis of Personal Preferences and the 'Objective Good' , 2005 .

[17]  M. Zeegers,et al.  A meta-analysis demonstrates no significant differences between patient and population preferences. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[19]  T Fahey,et al.  Shared decision making in hypertension: the impact of patient preferences on treatment choice. , 2001, Family practice.

[20]  M. Drummond,et al.  Toward a consensus on the QALY. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[21]  T. Regan.  The Case for Animal Rights , 1983 .

[22]  J. Harsanyi.  Rational behavior and bargaining equilibrium in games and social situations: Frontmatter , 1977 .

[23]  A. Brennan,et al.  Should patients have a greater role in valuing health states? , 2005, Applied health economics and health policy.

[24]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking , 1953, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  M C Weinstein,et al.  The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.