论文信息 - How well does a Vanilla Loop fit into a Frame?

How well does a Vanilla Loop fit into a Frame?

Abstract The frame language FRL is compared with some newer object-oriented languages, namely LOOPS, the Flavor System and the Poor Man's Flavor System. The kernel features are investigated in detail and a simulation of FRL in the Flavor System is performed. The conclusion is that in general the object-oriented languages cannot be easily utilized as a substitute for FRL frames because of the different view these languages have of objects, but there are important special cases where object-oriented languages are very similar to FRL.

Bernhard Nebel

[1] David S. Touretzky,et al. The Mathematics of Inheritance Systems , 1984 .

[2] Wendy G. Lehnert,et al. A Critical Perspective on KRL , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[3] Guy L. Steele,et al. Common Lisp the Language , 1984 .

[4] Ronald J. Brachman,et al. An overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System , 1985 .

[5] David Robson,et al. Smalltalk-80: The Language and Its Implementation , 1983 .

[6] Carl Hewitt,et al. A Universal Modular ACTOR Formalism for Artificial Intelligence , 1973, IJCAI.

[7] Marvin Minsky,et al. A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[8] Daniel G. Bobrow,et al. KRL: Another Perspective , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[9] Daniel G. Bobrow,et al. Knowledge Programming in Loops , 1983, COMPCON.

[10] Wolfgang Wahlster,et al. Case Role Filling As A Side Effect Of Visual Search , 1983, EACL.

[11] Daniel G. Bobrow,et al. On Overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language , 1976, Cogn. Sci..

[12] Joseph E. Stoy,et al. Denotational Semantics: The Scott-Strachey Approach to Programming Language Theory , 1981 .